Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mnemonic Strategy Versus Spaced Retrieval Training in Those With Mild Cognitive Impairment (NCT NCT04533204)
NCT ID: NCT04533204
Last Updated: 2021-03-23
Results Overview
Change in memory for 45 trained object location associations
COMPLETED
NA
59 participants
up to 1 month after last training session
2021-03-23
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mnemonic Strategy Training
Training using mnemonic strategies
mnemonic strategy training: training using mnemonic strategies
|
Spaced Retrieval Training
Training using spaced retrieval
spaced retrieval training: training using spaced retrieval
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
29
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
28
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Mnemonic Strategy Training
Training using mnemonic strategies
mnemonic strategy training: training using mnemonic strategies
|
Spaced Retrieval Training
Training using spaced retrieval
spaced retrieval training: training using spaced retrieval
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Unable to understand training instructions
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mnemonic Strategy Training
n=28 Participants
Training using mnemonic strategies
mnemonic strategy training: training using mnemonic strategies
|
Spaced Retrieval Training
n=29 Participants
Training using spaced retrieval
spaced retrieval training: training using spaced retrieval
|
Total
n=57 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group was removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
70.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
71.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants • 1 participant in each group removed due to inability to understand training instructions
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 1 month after last training sessionChange in memory for 45 trained object location associations
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mnemonic Strategy Training
n=28 Participants
Training using mnemonic strategies
mnemonic strategy training: training using mnemonic strategies
|
Spaced Retrieval Training
n=29 Participants
Training using spaced retrieval
spaced retrieval training: training using spaced retrieval
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Correct Object Location Associations Assessed up to 1 Month Post-treatment
|
80.0 percent correct
Interval 74.86 to 85.14
|
62.45 percent correct
Interval 57.4 to 67.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 1 month after last training sessionPopulation: Computer errors resulted in loss of data from the first 15 participants (7 MST, 8 SRT)
Change in accuracy for novel object location associations using a touchscreen task; distance measured in cm from actual location
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mnemonic Strategy Training
n=21 Participants
Training using mnemonic strategies
mnemonic strategy training: training using mnemonic strategies
|
Spaced Retrieval Training
n=21 Participants
Training using spaced retrieval
spaced retrieval training: training using spaced retrieval
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Accuracy (vs. Baseline) on Novel Object Location Associations
|
6.1 error in centimeters
Interval 4.8 to 7.4
|
7.14 error in centimeters
Interval 5.84 to 8.44
|
Adverse Events
Mnemonic Strategy Training
Spaced Retrieval Training
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Benjamin Hampstead
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; University of Michigan
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place