Using Electrical Nerve Stimulation to Control Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT04529941

Last Updated: 2025-10-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-24

Study Completion Date

2024-09-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine if sending mild electrical signals just under your skin will improve atrial fibrillation symptoms by controlling your heart rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will have a 1:1 randomization to receive subcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ScNS) to observe if the stimulation can reduce atrial fibrillation burden in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). All subjects will undergo the implant of a neurostimulator lead. The experimental group will receive stimulation and the control group will not receive stimulation. All subjects will complete the same follow up visits to compare the 2 groups.

Primary Objective: To test the hypothesis that chronic subcutaneous nerve stimulation can reduce AF burden in patients with severe symptomatic AF unresponsive to conventional therapies

The secondary objective:

To test the hypotheses that the effect of ScNS on the following endpoints is different between the two randomization groups:

1. Time-dependent reduction of AF burden
2. Effects of ScNS on ventricular rate control during AF
3. Reduction of SKNA
4. Improvement of quality of life

The study will enroll patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation unresponsive to conventional therapy defined by not responding to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug. The study will enroll 30 patients, including 15 men and 15 women between the 18 and 75 years old. There will be no sex/gender/racial/ethnic based exclusion. Patients will be enrolled from the Cedars Sinai Medical Center.

The patients will undergo surgical implantation of an externalized lead under the skin on the chest wall. The wire is then connected to a neurostimulator. The experimental group (Group A) will receive ScNS (3.5mA) for two weeks. The sham group (Group B) will receive sham (0 mA) stimulation for two weeks. The AF burden will be assessed by a 7-day mobile cardiac telemetry device provided by Preventice. An additional mobile cardiac telemetry device, Bittium Faros, will also be worn at similar time points to monitor skin sympathetic nerve activity. An Apple watch will be used to collect additional information on the frequencies of AF between the Baseline Visit until the 3 Month Visit 7 Day Mobile Cardiac Telemetry is complete. After completion of the week 3 visit, the sham group (Group B) will be able to receive ScNS (3.5 mA) for two weeks. The AF burden will be assessed post-procedure by mobile cardiac telemetry by Preventice and Bittium Faros

Study duration: 36 Months

Subject duration: up to 5 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will have a 1:1 randomization to receive subcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ScNS) to observe if the stimulation can reduce atrial fibrillation burden in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). All subjects will undergo the implant of a neurostimulator lead.

The experimental group will receive stimulation and the control group will not receive stimulation. All subjects will complete the same follow up visits comparing the 2 groups. The control group will have an option to cross over to the experimental group 3 weeks post-randomization to receive the stimulation. They will repeat the baseline visit, procedure visit and all follow-up visits post-procedure.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Subjects will not be aware whether the ScNS is turned on or off. However, after three weeks from the initial surgery, control subjects that decide to the second procedure will be aware of what group they were randomized to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group

Will receive stimulation ScNS at 3.5mA output

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Device Implant with Active Treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

ScNS at 3.5mA output for 2 weeks

Control Group

Does not receive therapy

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Device Implant without Active Treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

No device output for 2 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Device Implant with Active Treatment

ScNS at 3.5mA output for 2 weeks

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device Implant without Active Treatment

No device output for 2 weeks

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 to 75 years of age
* Symptomatic Paroxysmal AF.

* Symptomatic paroxysmal AF is defined by AF with patient-reported perception of one or more of the following symptoms: palpitations, dizziness/presyncope, syncope, dyspnea, chest pain, malaise, and fatigue and activity intolerance.
* There is at least one ECG-documented AF episode.
* Unresponsive to conventional therapy is defined by not responding to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug (class I, class III, or atrioventricular nodal blocker).
* The left atrial size \<50 mm by transthoracic echocardiography documented by eligibility visit echocardiogram
* Documented atrial fibrillation as defined as atrial fibrillation \>30 seconds in duration with an atrial fibrillation burden determined by a minimum of 7 days of continuous ePatch monitoring within 6 months before surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients without AF episodes during monitoring period will be excluded from the study and count as screen failure
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \<40%
* Heart failure with functional classes III or IV
* Recurrent vasovagal syncope
* Valvular AF (severe mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis)
* Congenital heart diseases
* Wolff Parkinson-White Syndrome
* Stroke within the past 6 months
* Any history of myocardial infarction
* Malignancies with a life expectancy of \< 1 year
* A history of ablation procedures to treat left atrial tachyarrhythmias or other serious comorbidity
* Any history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) defined by (1) \> 30 s in duration or (2) \< 30 s in duration, but is associated with hemodynamic consequences such as hypotension and syncope.
* Patients with a vagal nerve stimulator
* Active thyrotoxicosis
* Sick sinus syndrome with symptomatic bradycardia
* Heart rate \< 50 beats per minute in sinus rhythm on 12-lead ECG
* Systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg
* Any experimental medication concomitantly or within 4 weeks of participation in the study
* Subjects with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)
* Pre-existing neuromodulation devices, such as vagal nerve stimulators, spinal cord stimulators and sacral nerve stimulators
* People with a history of allergy to ECG electrodes, adhesive tape, or nylon
* Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peng-Sheng Chen

Staff Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peng-Sheng Chen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CedarsSinaiMC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7OT2OD028190-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00000581

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.