Effect of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia on Quality of Recovery After Unilateral Nephrectomy.
NCT ID: NCT04521556
Last Updated: 2021-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-01
2021-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia on Quality of Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy.
NCT04587505
Comparison Between Epidural Analgesia and Intrathecal Opioid Analgesia for Pain Management in Open Nephrectomy
NCT06595329
Risk Factors for Chronic Postoperative Pain After Elective Nephrectomy
NCT06673979
Effect of Psychosocial and Psychophysical Factors and Preemptive Analgesia on Postoperative Pain in Upper Limb Surgery
NCT05248152
A Comparative Study Between Analgesic Effect of Opioid Free and Opioid Based Anesthesia in Radical Nephrectomy Surgery
NCT05312541
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Balanced crystalloid fluids were used to treat hypovolemia. Additionally, 6% Hydroxyethyl starch was used before blood transfusion products to treat profound hypovolemia.
Blood transfusions were given according to clinical situation. Bradycardia was treated with atropine. Hypotension was treated with ephedrine boluses. Anti-inflammatory drug metamizole (dipyrone) 2.5 g was given intravenously before the end of the surgery and after 12 hours after the surgery. Neostigmine 2.5 mg with atropine 1 mg was used for the reversal of the effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents after surgery. Participants were placed for one day in a urology high care unit provided with constant and vigilant nurse care.
Crystalloid infusions were used for maintaining diuresis. Gastroprotection was done with pantoprazole 40 mg. Metoclopramid 10 mg was given for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
The postoperative QoR was evaluated with three QoR scales. Scales for pain, anxiety and PONV were also examined. The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire evaluated quality of life one month before and one month after surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Epidural anesthesia and analgesia
Epidural catheter insertion: Th 9 - Th 10 or Th 10 - Th 11 using the midline approach.
Safety of the epidural catheter was confirmed with lidocaine 60 mg. Epidural loading dose was given according to our classification (3,4,5 or 6 ml).
Postoperative period in urology high care unit. Epidural analgesia ropivacaine/morphine was administered by a urologist according to our classification (2x2 ml, 2x3 ml and 3x3 ml).
Epidural anesthesia with light general anesthesia
Epidural anaesthesia: mixture of ropivacaine 6.5 mg/ml and fentanyl 8.3 μg/ml.
Light general anesthesia: isoflurane in mixture of 50/50 of nitrous oxide and oxygen to achieve Minimum alveolar concentration between 0.6 and 0.8.
Postoperative epidural analgesia
Before the end of operation was given 4 ml of the mixture of ropivacaine 4.4 mg/ml and morphine 0.8mg/ml. Epidural analgesia was continued for next 24 hours with a mixture of ropivacaine 2.2 mg/ml and morphine 0.4 mg/ml.
Balanced general anesthesia and tramadol analgesia
Postoperative period in urology high care unit.
General anesthesia
Maintaining general anesthesia: nitrous oxide and oxygen in mixture 50/50 and isoflurane to achieve minimum alveolar concentration between 0.8 and 1.
Fentanyl loading dose: 6-8 μg/kg. Additional fentanyl doses were given incrementally.
Continuous intravenous analgesia
Tramadol 100 mg in the first hour followed by tramadol 300 mg continuously for the next 24 hours.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epidural anesthesia with light general anesthesia
Epidural anaesthesia: mixture of ropivacaine 6.5 mg/ml and fentanyl 8.3 μg/ml.
Light general anesthesia: isoflurane in mixture of 50/50 of nitrous oxide and oxygen to achieve Minimum alveolar concentration between 0.6 and 0.8.
Postoperative epidural analgesia
Before the end of operation was given 4 ml of the mixture of ropivacaine 4.4 mg/ml and morphine 0.8mg/ml. Epidural analgesia was continued for next 24 hours with a mixture of ropivacaine 2.2 mg/ml and morphine 0.4 mg/ml.
General anesthesia
Maintaining general anesthesia: nitrous oxide and oxygen in mixture 50/50 and isoflurane to achieve minimum alveolar concentration between 0.8 and 1.
Fentanyl loading dose: 6-8 μg/kg. Additional fentanyl doses were given incrementally.
Continuous intravenous analgesia
Tramadol 100 mg in the first hour followed by tramadol 300 mg continuously for the next 24 hours.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: I, II, III
Exclusion Criteria
* Delirium
* Acute psychosis
* Emergent surgery
* Hospitalisation in Intensive care unit
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: IV
* Reoperations
* Muscular diseases
* Montreal cognitive test \<24 points
* Contraindications for epidural anesthesia
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital of Split
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ruben Kovac
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ruben Kovac
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Bozidar Duplancic
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Hospital Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Verica Ilijev
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Ivo Juginovic
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Split, Department of Urology
Ivan Velat
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Split,Department of Urology
Hrvoje Vucemilovic
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Svjetlana Dosenovic
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Split, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Split
Split, , Croatia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Greg Snow (2020) blockrand: Randomization for Block Random Clinical Trials. R package version 1.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=blockrand
Stamer UM, Hothker F, Lehnen K, Stuber F. [Postoperative analgesia with tramadol and metamizol. Continual infusion versus patient controlled analgesia]. Anaesthesist. 2003 Jan;52(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s00101-002-0427-1. German.
Myles PS. Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):396-401. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000612.
Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, Bost JE, Kluivers KB, Nilsson UG, Tanaka Y, Forbes A. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Kleif J, Gogenur I. Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score-An observational study. J Surg Res. 2018 May;225:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.040. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Cao X, Yumul R, Elvir Lazo OL, Friedman J, Durra O, Zhang X, White PF. A novel visual facial anxiety scale for assessing preoperative anxiety. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0171233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171233. eCollection 2017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2181-147-01/06/M.S.-19-2.
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.