RCT With 3 Different Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Lift
NCT ID: NCT04506827
Last Updated: 2020-08-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-23
2019-12-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: Twenty-four patients needing MSA were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to 3 different groups: Anorganic Bovine Bone Mineral (ABBM) as control, Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP) with or without hyaluronic acid (HA) as test groups. Nine months after MSA bone biopsies were harvested for the histomorphometric analysis. Secondary outcomes were mean bone gain, intraoperative and post-operative complications, implant insertion torque, implant failure and patient related outcome measures (PROMs).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Synthetic Hydroxyapatite and Inorganic Bovine Bone in Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT03077867
Comparative Study Between Lyophilized or Frozen Bone Allografts for Sinus-lifting
NCT02583737
Influence of Anatomy of Maxillary Sinus on New Bone Formation After Transcrestal Augmentation Procedures
NCT03209284
Comparison of Phicogenic vs. Xenogeneic Biomaterial for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT03682315
SINUS LIFT 100% Anorganic Bovine Bone vs. 50% Anorganic Bovine Bone + 50% Autologous Bone
NCT02170129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) is probably the most predictable and best performing technique.
The present randomized controlled study aims to evaluate and compare, histomorphometrically and clinically three different bone substitutes such as: ABBM, Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP) with or without the addition of hyaluronic acid (HA) that were used for lateral MSA. This study population will be followed until the 3rd year. This study describes histological differences between the three groups at 9 months.
All the patients enrolled in the study received a session of oral hygiene and a periodontal examination before the surgical procedure to obtain a more favorable oral environment for wound healing. A CBCT was mandatory for all included cases to verify that the maxillary sinus was clear and that the residual bone height was 3 mm or less. All the enrolled patients received 2 gr. of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (or 600 mg. of clindamycin for those who were allergic to penicillins) as a pre-medication one-hour before surgery. All patients rinsed for 1 minute with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash (and twice a day for the following 3 weeks). Local anesthesia was administered, a mid-crestal incision with mesial and distal release were performed to access the lateral bone wall of the maxillary sinus, subsequently, ultrasound bone surgery (Piezosurgery ®, Carasco, Italy) with specific tips was used for the bone window osteotomy (Figure 1-A). The Schneiderian membrane was reflected and lifted up medially with flat sinus curettes. Once the sinus membrane was completely lifted a bioabsorbable pericardium membrane (Smartbrane, Regedent AG, Zurich, Switzerland) was applied to protect it (Figure 1-B). The randomization sealed envelopes were opened and the clinician allocated the patients to one of the three experimental groups:
1. Control group that received Demineralized Bovine Bone Mineral (Bio-Oss Cancellous, Geistlich, Wolhunsen, Switzerland);
2. Test group 1 that received TCP with particle size ranging from 250 to 1000 µm (Osopia, Regedent, Zurich, Switzerland);
3. Test group 2 that received TCP as in test group1 plus crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid (Hyadent BG, Regedent, Zurich, Switzerland) with a ratio 2 to 1.
the bony window was repositioned, stabilized and covered with a resorbable pericardium membrane. Nine months after the MSA a CBCT analysis was required to evaluate the total bone height gain.
Depending on the treatment plan, between one and three implants, bone level (BL) or tissue level (TL), of two different manufacturers (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland and Sweden \& Martina, Due Carrare, Italy) were positioned. While preparing the osteotomy implant site a bone biopsy was harvested using a trephine. The implant insertion torque was measured in Ncm for each implant.
All patients were prescribed 1gr amoxicillin + clavulanic acid twice daily for 7 days (for those who were allergic to penicillin 300mg clindamycin 3 times daily for 7 days) as post-operative prophylaxis. All patients received 8mg of dexamethasone immediately after surgery and 4 mg of dexamethasone per day were prescribed for the following 5 days. Analgesics were prescribed (1gr paracetamol 3 times daily) according to patients' need. The use of removable temporary restorations was not recommended during the healing period.
After an osseointegration period of 3 months, the implants were restored. The prosthetic procedures were similar for all groups, impressions were taken with a polyether rubber material (Impregum, Espe Dental AG, Seefeld, Germany) and a customized impression tray. Final Zirconia screw-retained restorations were delivered after a period of 2/3 weeks, peri-apical radiographs were taken and oral hygiene instructions were given to all participants in the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
The clinician who registers clinical parameters won't be informed of the group allocation. The histologist will receive biopsies with a numeric code but without informations of the graft material used.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
patients in the control group received Demineralized Bovine Bone Mineral for the maxillary sinus augmentation
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus
Maxillary Sinus Graft with ABBM
The maxillary sinuses in the control group are grafted with ABBM
Test group 1
patients in the test group 1 received TCP with particle size from 250 to 1000 µm
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus
Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP
The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP
Test group 2
patients in the test group 2 received TCP as in test group1 plus crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus
Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP + HA
The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP + HA
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus
Maxillary Sinus Graft with ABBM
The maxillary sinuses in the control group are grafted with ABBM
Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP
The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP
Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP + HA
The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP + HA
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years or older
* residual ridge height less than 3mm
Exclusion Criteria
* systemic diseases that could negatively influence wound healing;
* heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes/day);
* head and neck irradiation treatment;
* uncontrolled diabetes;
* chronic or acute sinus pathology;
* uncontrolled periodontal disease;
* full mouth plaque and bleeding score higher than 25%,
* tooth extractions in the previous 2 months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pisa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonio Barone
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicola A Valente, DDS, MS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Seville, Spain
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Geneva
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SinusAug
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.