RCT With 3 Different Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Lift

NCT ID: NCT04506827

Last Updated: 2020-08-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-23

Study Completion Date

2019-12-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Lateral maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) is a predictable bone regeneration technique in case of atrophy of the posterior-upper maxilla. Aimed at obtaining quantity and quality of bone suitable for receiving osseointegrated implants, its success is largely due to the skill of the surgeon, but also to the characteristics of the biomaterial used.

Methods: Twenty-four patients needing MSA were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to 3 different groups: Anorganic Bovine Bone Mineral (ABBM) as control, Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP) with or without hyaluronic acid (HA) as test groups. Nine months after MSA bone biopsies were harvested for the histomorphometric analysis. Secondary outcomes were mean bone gain, intraoperative and post-operative complications, implant insertion torque, implant failure and patient related outcome measures (PROMs).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla requires the creation of sufficient volumetric quantity of bone, through regeneration techniques, necessary to position the implants.

Maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) is probably the most predictable and best performing technique.

The present randomized controlled study aims to evaluate and compare, histomorphometrically and clinically three different bone substitutes such as: ABBM, Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP) with or without the addition of hyaluronic acid (HA) that were used for lateral MSA. This study population will be followed until the 3rd year. This study describes histological differences between the three groups at 9 months.

All the patients enrolled in the study received a session of oral hygiene and a periodontal examination before the surgical procedure to obtain a more favorable oral environment for wound healing. A CBCT was mandatory for all included cases to verify that the maxillary sinus was clear and that the residual bone height was 3 mm or less. All the enrolled patients received 2 gr. of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (or 600 mg. of clindamycin for those who were allergic to penicillins) as a pre-medication one-hour before surgery. All patients rinsed for 1 minute with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash (and twice a day for the following 3 weeks). Local anesthesia was administered, a mid-crestal incision with mesial and distal release were performed to access the lateral bone wall of the maxillary sinus, subsequently, ultrasound bone surgery (Piezosurgery ®, Carasco, Italy) with specific tips was used for the bone window osteotomy (Figure 1-A). The Schneiderian membrane was reflected and lifted up medially with flat sinus curettes. Once the sinus membrane was completely lifted a bioabsorbable pericardium membrane (Smartbrane, Regedent AG, Zurich, Switzerland) was applied to protect it (Figure 1-B). The randomization sealed envelopes were opened and the clinician allocated the patients to one of the three experimental groups:

1. Control group that received Demineralized Bovine Bone Mineral (Bio-Oss Cancellous, Geistlich, Wolhunsen, Switzerland);
2. Test group 1 that received TCP with particle size ranging from 250 to 1000 µm (Osopia, Regedent, Zurich, Switzerland);
3. Test group 2 that received TCP as in test group1 plus crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid (Hyadent BG, Regedent, Zurich, Switzerland) with a ratio 2 to 1.

the bony window was repositioned, stabilized and covered with a resorbable pericardium membrane. Nine months after the MSA a CBCT analysis was required to evaluate the total bone height gain.

Depending on the treatment plan, between one and three implants, bone level (BL) or tissue level (TL), of two different manufacturers (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland and Sweden \& Martina, Due Carrare, Italy) were positioned. While preparing the osteotomy implant site a bone biopsy was harvested using a trephine. The implant insertion torque was measured in Ncm for each implant.

All patients were prescribed 1gr amoxicillin + clavulanic acid twice daily for 7 days (for those who were allergic to penicillin 300mg clindamycin 3 times daily for 7 days) as post-operative prophylaxis. All patients received 8mg of dexamethasone immediately after surgery and 4 mg of dexamethasone per day were prescribed for the following 5 days. Analgesics were prescribed (1gr paracetamol 3 times daily) according to patients' need. The use of removable temporary restorations was not recommended during the healing period.

After an osseointegration period of 3 months, the implants were restored. The prosthetic procedures were similar for all groups, impressions were taken with a polyether rubber material (Impregum, Espe Dental AG, Seefeld, Germany) and a customized impression tray. Final Zirconia screw-retained restorations were delivered after a period of 2/3 weeks, peri-apical radiographs were taken and oral hygiene instructions were given to all participants in the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alveolar Bone Atrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Three groups of patients will be treated with 3 different graft materials
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The envelope with the group assignment will be opened by the surgeon at the time of surgery and the patient won't be informed.

The clinician who registers clinical parameters won't be informed of the group allocation. The histologist will receive biopsies with a numeric code but without informations of the graft material used.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

patients in the control group received Demineralized Bovine Bone Mineral for the maxillary sinus augmentation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus

Maxillary Sinus Graft with ABBM

Intervention Type DEVICE

The maxillary sinuses in the control group are grafted with ABBM

Test group 1

patients in the test group 1 received TCP with particle size from 250 to 1000 µm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus

Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP

Intervention Type DEVICE

The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP

Test group 2

patients in the test group 2 received TCP as in test group1 plus crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus

Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP + HA

Intervention Type DEVICE

The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP + HA

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

Biomaterial Graft into the Maxillary Sinus

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Maxillary Sinus Graft with ABBM

The maxillary sinuses in the control group are grafted with ABBM

Intervention Type DEVICE

Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP

The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Maxillary Sinus Graft with TCP + HA

The maxillary sinuses in the test1 group are grafted with TCP + HA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Anorganic Bovine Bone Mineral (ABBM) Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP) hyaluronic acid (HA)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* need for maxillary sinus augmentation
* 18 years or older
* residual ridge height less than 3mm

Exclusion Criteria

* full contraindication to implant surgery,
* systemic diseases that could negatively influence wound healing;
* heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes/day);
* head and neck irradiation treatment;
* uncontrolled diabetes;
* chronic or acute sinus pathology;
* uncontrolled periodontal disease;
* full mouth plaque and bleeding score higher than 25%,
* tooth extractions in the previous 2 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pisa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Antonio Barone

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicola A Valente, DDS, MS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Seville, Spain

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Geneva

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SinusAug

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.