OPTImized RESTing Environments in Rehabilitation

NCT ID: NCT04500951

Last Updated: 2022-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-20

Study Completion Date

2022-02-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates whether an individually designed environment can support and improve the quality of daytime resting periods in in-hospital neurorehabilitation of patients suffering severe acquired brain injury.

The effect of a individually optimized resting environment will be tested against a standard resting environment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim:

The aim is to identify differences in quality of rest as reflected by clinical evaluation, pulse rate, motor activity and autonomic balance between the optimized resting environment (ORE) and the standard resting environment (SR).

Method: A Randomized controlled time-series study. Randomization to either SR or ORE for each of the 9 resting periods during a three-day recording session. A period of three days will allow collection of sufficient data. This will also allow the analysis to take the random effects of time and weekday into account. Outcome measures will be differences in mean heart rate during daytime resting periods, aggregated measures of heart rate variability and proportion of resting minutes according to accelerometry.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acquired Brain Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A Randomized controlled time-series study. A Randomized controlled time-series study. Randomization to either SR or ORE for each of the 9 resting periods during a three-day recording session. A period of three days will allow collection of sufficient data. This will also allow the analysis to take the random effects of time and weekday into account.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Optimized resting environment

The optimized resting environment will consist of the following complex intervention.

* Technically assisted noise control in regards of alarms in the patient room
* Visual signing reminding staff that the patient is not to be disturbed during rest
* Individual optimization of room environment according to information received from relatives
* Individual optimization of room environment and positioning according to systematized knowledge on best practice in the intervention ward including auditory and visual stimuli

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Optimized resting environment

Intervention Type OTHER

Alarms from feeding pumps will be relayed to the nurse call system for all intervention periods. Alternatively meals will be timewise reorganized to not interfer with the intervention resting periods. Signs reminding staff not to disturb will be posted for all intervention periods.

For each patient the close team of rehabilitation professionals will agree upon a guideline suggesting the optimal resting environment for the specific patient. The guideline wil be based on knowledge gathered from relatives on pre-injury preferences. Furthermore, the guideline will be developed based on a toolbox of possible intervention representing best practice. The toolbox has been designed according to the categories of the International Classification of Functioning.

The intervention will designed individually for each patient.

Standard resting environment

Standard resting environment, will consist of a basic positioning either reclined in bed or reclined in wheelchair according to regular procedures of the ward.

Group Type OTHER

Standard resting environment

Intervention Type OTHER

The control condition, standard resting environment, will consist of a basic positioning either reclined in bed or reclined in wheelchair according to regular procedures of the ward. Pressure ulcers and positioning believed to induce pain will be avoided.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Optimized resting environment

Alarms from feeding pumps will be relayed to the nurse call system for all intervention periods. Alternatively meals will be timewise reorganized to not interfer with the intervention resting periods. Signs reminding staff not to disturb will be posted for all intervention periods.

For each patient the close team of rehabilitation professionals will agree upon a guideline suggesting the optimal resting environment for the specific patient. The guideline wil be based on knowledge gathered from relatives on pre-injury preferences. Furthermore, the guideline will be developed based on a toolbox of possible intervention representing best practice. The toolbox has been designed according to the categories of the International Classification of Functioning.

The intervention will designed individually for each patient.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard resting environment

The control condition, standard resting environment, will consist of a basic positioning either reclined in bed or reclined in wheelchair according to regular procedures of the ward. Pressure ulcers and positioning believed to induce pain will be avoided.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Severe Acquired brain injury
* \>= 18 years
* Relatives/Surrogate can give informed consent
* Classified as being ≤ 7 on the level of cognitive functions scale (also known as Rancho Los Amigos Scale)

Exclusion Criteria

* Admitted due to polyneuropathies e.g. Guillain-Barré
* Terminal illness
* Spinal lesions
* Expected stay \< 3 weeks
* Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aalborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Simon Svanborg Kjeldsen

PhD Student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jørgen F Nielsen, MD DMSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regionshospitalet Hammel Neurocenter

Hammel, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Related Links

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1-10-72-32-18

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1-10-72-32-18

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

80

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.