Needs, Perceptions and Acute Stress of Healtcare Workers Caring for COVID-19 Patients in South America

NCT ID: NCT04486404

Last Updated: 2022-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1800 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The pressure on care and the demand for critical decision-making generated by the current SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, together with the situation of extreme social alarm and the adverse conditions in which care work must be promoted at this time, draw an extreme scenario in which action is urgently needed to alleviate emotional overload, acute stress reactions and other affective pathologies or psychosomatic reactions that may eventually lead to post-traumatic stress situations. This eventuality is being observed massively among professionals from different groups and levels of responsibility.

In the case of healthcare personnel, it should be added that the care of non-COVID19 patients (of all pathologies and conditions) is clearly compromised and it is up to the professionals as a whole to make critical decisions and exercise a professional practice that is radically different from what has usually been done, which may require the application of undesirable triage criteria that are difficult for everyone to assume.

Healthcare professionals and other essential personnel for healthcare and social-healthcare work (including personnel from external companies) are being subjected to emotional tensions and extraordinary, high-intensity work demands. Without professionals who feel supported and with moral strength, care will be even more compromised.

The current scenario makes us think of many critical situations that are occurring as a result of the overload experienced. It is essential to act in order to counteract the devastating effect of this health crisis on health professionals and those who support them in their care work.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronavirus 2019 disease - of recent appearance - has become a global public health problem due to its rapid spread, since 11 March declared by WHO as a pandemic. It represents a real challenge for health systems, which at first lack information to organize the response to this situation, effective treatments to combat this lethal infection and with health personnel lacking the necessary security in their daily work to minimize the risk of contagion. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused, up to July 21, more than 609,000 deaths worldwide, 28,422 in Spain. The number of professionals suffering from COVID-19 is high. In Spain it accounts for more than 20% of the total number of people infected.

In this way, health professionals have been taking on a notable role without hardly any intention of doing so. Situations of constant uncertainty and emotional distress have posed a risk to patients and to the quality of care, making health professionals the second most affected by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), which also requires special biosecurity and protection measures.

In a global survey, 52% of the 2711 health workers included reported that at least 1 standard PPE piece was out of stock. For example, in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have taken several steps to optimize the use of PPE due to its scarcity. Although professionals in Germany consider that they have been well prepared for the pandemic, there are substantial differences in the availability of PPE depending on the health professional and the setting (outpatient or acute care hospitals). In Spain, 54% of primary health care workers reported that they were not adequately trained to use PPE. No similar studies we found in the local context of South American countries.

Although the incidence of the pandemic has expanded differently in different geographical areas of each country, most hospitals and health centres around the world have had to reorganise themselves to prioritise the care of COVID-19 patients, breaking with their usual work dynamics. To this cause of work stress must be added the uncertainty in which decisions have had to be made and the lack of resources both to treat patients adequately and to protect against possible contagion. Reactions of compassionate fatigue, post-traumatic stress, and moral damage have been observed among health professionals, which has depended on the expansion of the pandemic, available means, and individual differences in stress response.

These types of responses and reactions to this crisis are natural and affect all staff and all professional levels, including care support staff (IT, supplies, cleaning, etc.). The opposite would be difficult to explain. However, the key question is not the number of professionals who have been emotionally affected as a result of their care work, a circumstance that is aggravated in this crisis but is inherent to the work they do, but rather how many are unable to recover, how their resilience is evolving or to what extent they are able to cope with a possible new outbreak.

Most studies have analysed the emotional responses in a short period of time (approximately one week) coinciding with a specific stage of the crisis. However, studies on community coping with catastrophic situations have described that the psychological response evolves over time resulting in: impact phase, heroic (intensification of efforts), honeymoon (optimism), disillusionment (fatigue) and restoration (recovery pre-crisis levels). Therefore, it is expected that the effects of the pandemic on the psychological and emotional well-being of health professionals will vary as the pandemic evolves.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Stress Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Online survery to healtcare personnel and other professionals in the front-line from Col, Bra and Ec.

Online survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Online survey including questions related to PPE availability, perceptions, emotions and EASE scale (Acute Stress Scale).

Group 2

Online survery to healtcare personnel and other professionals in the front-line from Col, Bra, Ch and Ec.

Online survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Online survey including questions related to PPE availability, perceptions, emotions and EASE scale (Acute Stress Scale).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Online survey

Online survey including questions related to PPE availability, perceptions, emotions and EASE scale (Acute Stress Scale).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthcare professionals, other professionals working in the front-line of COVID-19.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Catolica Santiago de Guayaquil

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad de Santander

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

José Joaquín Mira

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose J Mira, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Universidad de Santander

Bucaramanga, Santander Department, Colombia

Site Status

Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil

Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador

Site Status

Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

Elche, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Chile Colombia Ecuador Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Auxemery Y. Treatment of post-traumatic psychiatric disorders: A continuum of immediate, post-immediate and follow-up care mediated by specific psychotherapeutic principles. Clinical experience in French-speaking countries. Encephale. 2018 Nov;44(5):403-408. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29887301 (View on PubMed)

Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L, He L, Sheng C, Cai Y, Li X, Wang J, Zhang Z. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X. Epub 2020 Feb 19. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32085839 (View on PubMed)

Everly GS Jr, Mitchell JT. The debriefing "controversy" and crisis intervention: a review of lexical and substantive issues. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2000 Fall;2(4):211-25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11217152 (View on PubMed)

Kang L, Li Y, Hu S, Chen M, Yang C, Yang BX, Wang Y, Hu J, Lai J, Ma X, Chen J, Guan L, Wang G, Ma H, Liu Z. The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):e14. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30047-X. Epub 2020 Feb 5. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32035030 (View on PubMed)

Khalid I, Khalid TJ, Qabajah MR, Barnard AG, Qushmaq IA. Healthcare Workers Emotions, Perceived Stressors and Coping Strategies During a MERS-CoV Outbreak. Clin Med Res. 2016 Mar;14(1):7-14. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2016.1303. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26847480 (View on PubMed)

Li W, Yang Y, Liu ZH, Zhao YJ, Zhang Q, Zhang L, Cheung T, Xiang YT. Progression of Mental Health Services during the COVID-19 Outbreak in China. Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 15;16(10):1732-1738. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45120. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32226291 (View on PubMed)

Mira JJ, Carrillo I, Guilabert M, Lorenzo S, Perez-Perez P, Silvestre C, Ferrus L; Spanish Second Victim Research Team. The Second Victim Phenomenon After a Clinical Error: The Design and Evaluation of a Website to Reduce Caregivers' Emotional Responses After a Clinical Error. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 8;19(6):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7840.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28596148 (View on PubMed)

Mira JJ, Carrillo I, Lorenzo S, Ferrus L, Silvestre C, Perez-Perez P, Olivera G, Iglesias F, Zavala E, Maderuelo-Fernandez JA, Vitaller J, Nuno-Solinis R, Astier P; Research Group on Second and Third Victims. The aftermath of adverse events in Spanish primary care and hospital health professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 9;15:151. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0790-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25886369 (View on PubMed)

Mitchell JT. Innovative, precise, and descriptive terms for group crisis support services: a United Nations initiative. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2007 Fall;9(4):247-52.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18459528 (View on PubMed)

Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, McCoig M, Hahn-Cover K, Epperly KM, Phillips EC, Hall LW. Caring for our own: deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 May;36(5):233-40. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36038-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20480757 (View on PubMed)

Wu P, Fang Y, Guan Z, Fan B, Kong J, Yao Z, Liu X, Fuller CJ, Susser E, Lu J, Hoven CW. The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk. Can J Psychiatry. 2009 May;54(5):302-11. doi: 10.1177/070674370905400504.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19497162 (View on PubMed)

Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, Ng CH. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):228-229. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8. Epub 2020 Feb 4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32032543 (View on PubMed)

Martin-Delgado J, Poblete R, Serpa P, Mula A, Carrillo I, Fernandez C, Vicente Ripoll MA, Loudet C, Jorro F, Garcia Elorrio E, Guilabert M, Mira JJ. Contributing factors for acute stress in healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Ecuador. Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12626-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35589975 (View on PubMed)

Martin-Delgado J, Viteri E, Mula A, Serpa P, Pacheco G, Prada D, Campos de Andrade Lourencao D, Campos Pavan Baptista P, Ramirez G, Mira JJ. Availability of personal protective equipment and diagnostic and treatment facilities for healthcare workers involved in COVID-19 care: A cross-sectional study in Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0242185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242185. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33175877 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://secondvictimscovid19.umh.es/p/home.html

Be+ Against COVID Second Victims working group website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08/04/2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.