Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-08
2017-12-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effect of continuous activity monitoring using an electronic activity tracker (AT), compared to controls, and (2) the effect of additional personal coaching on exercise performance and fatigue of sarcoidosis patients.
Method: This prospective, randomized clinical trial included 54 sarcoidosis patients who received an AT (Group Ia: 27 with coaching and Group Ib: 27 without). Exercise capacity and fatigue scores (Fatigue Assessment Scale) were evaluated at baseline and after three months. A historical group of sarcoidosis patients (Group II; n=41) from an earlier study who did not follow a physical activity program served as controls.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interventions Against Fatigue in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis
NCT06659627
Assessment of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Spondylarthritis
NCT05926453
Evaluating Increasing Physical Activity After Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT02531022
Effects of a Rehabilitation Program on Immune Activation and Mood in Heart Failure Patients
NCT02358525
Training Study to Evaluate the Benefit of Exercise for Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
NCT00934609
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
So far, there is promising evidence for the benefits of physical training in sarcoidosis. Interventions involving technology that is readily accessible on a daily basis to monitor activity levels can support care providers in encouraging patients to achieve behavioral changes. These interventions may be an effective strategy to provide PA-coaching without increasing time demands on primary care providers. Moreover, they give patients an opportunity to keep up a more active lifestyle with direct feedback and monitor their physical performance over time. Counseling, guidance and support using e-health technology had been found to be very helpful for patients who want to improve their PA. The use of commercially available, technology-based wearable activity trackers (ATs) such as Fitbit is growing for research and recreational purposes, both among healthy persons and among those with chronic illness. Beneficial effects of AT-based counseling have been demonstrated in patients with chronic diseases. In a recent study by our group we found that wearing an AT stimulated patients to be more physically active.
The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effect of continuous activity monitoring using an electronical AT and (2) the effect of additional personal coaching of sarcoidosis patients. The outcome measures were exercise performance and fatigue.
Intervention All participants received a Fitbit for free. They were encouraged to improve their physical fitness, which was assessed at baseline. The patients in the intervention group (group Ia) engaged in a three-month physical therapist-guided activity program. The guidance was based on the input from the AT and the questionnaires. The weekly FAS scores, Fitbit-measured parameters and brief daily questions were combined in a web-based dashboard accessible to the assigned physical therapist. The information was used for goal setting, encouraging, and identifying barriers and facilitators for patients becoming more active. The coaching procedure included weekly action planning and feedback, modelling of behaviors and problem solving, and individual decision making by email and/or telephone. The coaching physical therapist acted as facilitator, and assisted participants in making choices and achieving success in terms of reaching self-selected goals.
Although the patients in group Ib did not receive the guidance from a physical therapist, their daily activity was also computed with the Fitbit Charge HR (Brand name), and patients were also able to use a Fitbit and monitor app to monitor their performance, questionnaire results and progress.
Self-report feedback questionnaires at follow-up (12 weeks) were used to determine participants' experience with data from the Fitbit tracker itself and coaching, if applicable.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group coaching
Performing physical activities with Activity tracker, coaching included
Physical Activity using an Activity Tracker
Group Independant
Performing physical activities with Activity tracker, coaching NOT included
Physical Activity using an Activity Tracker
Controls
Controls from former study (see Study description)
Physical Activity using an Activity Tracker
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical Activity using an Activity Tracker
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* no change in initiated medical management during the preceding three months
* having sufficient command of the Dutch language
* having internet access at home or a compatible smartphone/tablet.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ild care foundation
OTHER
St. Antonius Hospital
OTHER
Gelderse Vallei Hospital
OTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marjolein Drent, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
ild care foundation
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ildcarefitbit2017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.