Are SARS-CoV-2 Specific Antibodies a Correlate for Protection?

NCT ID: NCT04469634

Last Updated: 2023-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-31

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objectives of this study are (1) to determine the ex vivo neutralizing capacity and the longevity of SARS-CoV-2-specific Ab responses and (2) to measure the memory B-cell responses in a cohort of health care workers (HCW) recovering from severe, mild or asymptomatic infection. By focusing on HCW, a population that is at risk for re-infection during a second epidemic wave, the correlation between nAb levels and protection is investigated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

SARS-CoV-2 has spread at an unprecedented speed and scale since January 2020. Since then, Belgium has been confronted with \>60.000 diagnosed cases and likely many more undiagnosed with mild or no symptoms. The true seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the Belgian population is not known, yet increasing confidence about the performance of several serological assays paves the way to large-scale serosurveys. These studies will be crucial in assessing population immunity and evaluating the risk of re-infection. The first, smaller-scaled, antibody surveys report a range of seroprevalences, i.e. Germany (14%), The Netherlands (4%), USA (2.49-4.16%) and Belgium (4.7-6.9%). These studies suffer from conceptual and technical flaws yet are used for easing lockdown measures. A major limitation is that antibody (Ab) capture assays measure exposure to SARS-CoV-2, rather than subsequent protection, which requires assessment of the quality of the Abs including their capacity to neutralize the virus. Also the Ab levels required for protection and their duration are yet unknown. The proposed project aims to address these pertinent questions in a population at risk of re-infection during a second epidemic wave. Sero-neutralisation assays are regarded the gold standard method to measure ex vivo Ab neutralising activity against viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. A recent Chinese study, using a pseudovirus neutralisation assay, found that nAbs are detected from day 10-15 after onset of disease and that younger patients typically have lower levels of nAbs compared to middle-aged and elderly patients. Importantly, in about 1 out of 3 patients the nAb titers were low and in 10 young patients nAbs were absent. A pseudovirus is an imperfect model for SARS-CoV-2 because of the non-natural embedding of Spike protein in the pseudovirions and differences in glycosylation. In this study, a whole virus neutralisation assay will be used that was recently validated using a panel of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera in the lab of the Principal Investigator. Preliminary results of the study team show a rapid decline in nAb titer within 15-36d after diagnosis in 4/11 patients, while IgG and IgA remain steady and high in ELISA. Older studies with SARS-CoV-1 showed declining IgM and IgA antibody titers within 6 months, declining IgG titers after 1y, and a complete lack of antigen-specific peripheral memory B-cell (MBC) responses after recovery. Measuring only circulating Abs can be misleading as it excludes the detection of the MBC pool, which can exist in the absence of detectable serum Ab levels and is a pre-requisite to maintain protective immunity in the long term. Upon re-encounter with the antigen, MBC can rapidly differentiate to produce Abs. So far, little is known about humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 and their contribution to protection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

SARS-CoV2 COVID-19

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

antibody response and memory B-cell

Regular blood draws to measure antibody responses and memory B-cell responses Regular swab collection to test for re-infection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Assessing antibody responses, neutralizing capacity and memory B-cell function

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Assessing antibody responses, neutralizing capacity and memory B-cell function and their contribution to protection against re-infection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Assessing antibody responses, neutralizing capacity and memory B-cell function

Assessing antibody responses, neutralizing capacity and memory B-cell function and their contribution to protection against re-infection

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be diagnosed (PCR+) with COVID-19 between March-May 2020
* Be a permanent employee (HCW: nurse, physician, paramedical) of the study hospital
* Agree to complete a short questionnaire and be sampled 4 tubes of heparin whole blood every 3 months over a one-year period
* Have given their informed consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* Persons in serious clinical condition, incompatible with the informed consent procedure
* Pregnant women
* Persons that have not been diagnosed with COVID-19
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jessa Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universiteit Antwerpen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sciensano

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mensura

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin K. Ariƫn, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Antwerp

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Jessa Hospital

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1412/20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.