Wearable Remote Monitoring of Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate for Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT04455828

Last Updated: 2023-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-04-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to study in heart failure (HF) patients to better assess HF disease state, which can aid in management and improve outcomes. Primary aims of the study include: (1) Measure HR and RR at rest and during daily activity using the WHOOP device. (2) Correlate HR and RR response to activity to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and 90-day HF hospitalization rate. (3) Identify additional predictors of NYHA class and HF hospitalization rate for algorithm development to use the WHOOP device as a clinical tool for HF management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Heart Failure (HF) is a challenging condition to manage, with hospital readmission for HF exacerbation having negative impacts on patient outcomes and financial burden to both patient and health system \[Lloyd-Jones, 2010; Yancy, 2017; Ross, 2009; Chaudhry, 2007\]. An intuitive need for more sensitive predictors of HF exacerbations has led researchers to explore remote monitoring as a possible answer. Consumer-owned sensors have become more accurate in their recording of vital signs, and thus could hold potential for remote monitoring \[Dickinson, 2018\]. The combined measure of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) has been shown to predict New York Heart Association (NYHA) HF class, an indicator of severity of heart disease, in implantable cardiac devices with multi-sensor monitoring capabilities \[Auricchio, 2014; Prasun, 2019; Boehmer, 2015; Boehmer, 2017\]. Heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of sympathetic autonomic function, has also shown potential in prediction of adverse cardiac events \[Al-Zaiti, 2019; Shaffer, 2017; Bullinga, 2005; Tsuji, 1996\].

The WHOOP device, a wearable strap similar to a Fitbit, allows for real-time HR monitoring and can determine RR using respiratory sinus arrhythmia \[www.whoop.com/experience; Berryhill, 2020\]. It is one of the few devices on the market that can accurately track heart rate as well as respiratory rate in real-time (during activity) and is equipped with a multidirectional accelerometer for activity tracking. The WHOOP device was recently externally validated against polysomnography and continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) for sleep tracking, and continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) for HR and HRV (with less than 5% error) \[Berryhill, 2020\]. HRV, which represents the balance of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, is a known predictor of cardiac events. It is especially useful in HF, which is a chronically elevated catecholamine state leading to depressed HRV and is tied to NYHA HF class, an indicator of severity of disease \[Bullinga, 2005; Tsuji, 1996\].

Data so far regarding the efficacy of remote physiologic monitoring using cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), although promising in theory, has not yet proved sensitive in the detection of HF exacerbation. The aim of the CLEPSYDRA study was to use data extracted from implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation (CRT-D) devices in HF patients to predict heart failure events; although the main variables used in the novel algorithm, minute ventilation and patient activity, would intuitively seem to be predictors of poor outcome/HF exacerbation, the sensitivity of the algorithm to predict an event was only 34% \[6\]. It would appear that this combination of variables is not sufficient to predict adverse HF events. However, the HOME-CARE (HOME Monitoring in CArdiac REsynchronization Therapy) study showed more promising results, as their enhanced predictor, utilizing seven diagnostic variables from implanted CRT-Ds, boasted a sensitivity of 65.4% \[Sack, 2011\]. While the data from these studies is helpful, no study has been able to adequately identify and assess accurate predictors of HF class.

Current efficacious management strategies are limited to hemodynamic or multisensor monitoring systems. However, these are only available in implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) devices. These are not implanted in every HF patient \[Al-Zaiti, 2019\]. Non-invasive monitoring that provides similar data, such as wearable device monitoring, would expand the cohort of patients that would benefit from remote monitoring and would avoid the risks of having implanted hardware. Furthermore, better prediction of HF severity could help guide follow-up care and predict HF events \[Boehmer, 2015; Boehmer 2017\]. This would lead to more efficient management, less hospital readmission, and improve outcomes for HF patients overall \[Dickinson, 2018\].

The investigators propose a feasibility study in HF patients to better assess HF disease state, which can aid in management and improve outcomes. Subjects will wear the WHOOP device, which measures both activity and HR parameters and can derive RR using respiratory sinus arrhythmia, for 90 days. During this period, their HR and RR will be recorded at rest, during activity and post-activity recovery phases. This combined measure of HR/RR has been shown to predict NYHA HF class, an indicator of severity of disease, in implantable devices with multi-sensor monitoring capabilities; thus, it represents a useful management strategy in HF patients \[Bullinga, 2005; Tsuji, 1996\]. A continuous external monitoring device worn on the wrist, such as the WHOOP device, would provide valuable physiologic data for a cohort of HF patients who were previously unable to be monitored in this fashion. Secondary analysis of this study will investigate the use of intra- and post-activity HR and RR as predictors of hospitalization rates, a common problem in HF patients that correlate with worse mortality outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hospitalized Heart Failure subjects

Subjects hospitalized for heart failure exacerbation will be enrolled, prior to discharge from hospital, to wear the WHOOP device for 90 days.

WHOOP strap 3.0

Intervention Type DEVICE

WHOOP strap 3.0, a photodiode-based device that tracks heart rate, respiratory rate, sleep, and heart rate variability.

Non-hospitalized Heart Failure subjects

Subjects who have not been hospitalized in the past 1 year, but have a diagnosis of heart failure, will be enrolled during routine outpatient care to wear the WHOOP device for 90 days.

WHOOP strap 3.0

Intervention Type DEVICE

WHOOP strap 3.0, a photodiode-based device that tracks heart rate, respiratory rate, sleep, and heart rate variability.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

WHOOP strap 3.0

WHOOP strap 3.0, a photodiode-based device that tracks heart rate, respiratory rate, sleep, and heart rate variability.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject has provided informed consent
2. Male or female over the age of 18 years
3. The patient is either hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure or was discharged with a primary diagnosis of acute heart failure within 2 weeks prior to enrollment; or carries a diagnosis of heart failure and is seen as an outpatient at Hershey Medical Center.
4. NYHA functional class II-IV at time of enrollment
5. Subject willing to wear the WHOOP for the 90-day study period.
6. Subject owns a phone for pairing with the WHOOP device (required for data storage and transfer)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects who are limited by angina.
2. Subjects with severe aortic stenosis.
3. Subjects who are hemodynamically unstable requiring support with intravenous vasoactive medications or mechanical circulatory support
4. Subjects with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias within the past 6 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Boehmer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Penn State Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott MM, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger VL, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010 Feb 23;121(7):948-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20177011 (View on PubMed)

Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Colvin MM, Drazner MH, Filippatos GS, Fonarow GC, Givertz MM, Hollenberg SM, Lindenfeld J, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, Peterson PN, Stevenson LW, Westlake C. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail. 2017 Aug;23(8):628-651. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28461259 (View on PubMed)

Ross JS, Chen J, Lin Z, Bueno H, Curtis JP, Keenan PS, Normand SL, Schreiner G, Spertus JA, Vidan MT, Wang Y, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Recent national trends in readmission rates after heart failure hospitalization. Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Jan;3(1):97-103. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.885210. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19903931 (View on PubMed)

Chaudhry SI, Wang Y, Concato J, Gill TM, Krumholz HM. Patterns of weight change preceding hospitalization for heart failure. Circulation. 2007 Oct 2;116(14):1549-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690768. Epub 2007 Sep 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17846286 (View on PubMed)

Dickinson MG, Allen LA, Albert NA, DiSalvo T, Ewald GA, Vest AR, Whellan DJ, Zile MR, Givertz MM. Remote Monitoring of Patients With Heart Failure: A White Paper From the Heart Failure Society of America Scientific Statements Committee. J Card Fail. 2018 Oct;24(10):682-694. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30308242 (View on PubMed)

Auricchio A, Gold MR, Brugada J, Nolker G, Arunasalam S, Leclercq C, Defaye P, Calo L, Baumann O, Leyva F. Long-term effectiveness of the combined minute ventilation and patient activity sensors as predictor of heart failure events in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results of the Clinical Evaluation of the Physiological Diagnosis Function in the PARADYM CRT device Trial (CLEPSYDRA) study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jun;16(6):663-70. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.79. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24639140 (View on PubMed)

Boehmer JP, Hariharan R, Devecchi FG, Smith AL, Molon G, Capucci A, An Q, Averina V, Stolen CM, Thakur PH, Thompson JA, Wariar R, Zhang Y, Singh JP. A Multisensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients With Implanted Devices: Results From the MultiSENSE Study. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;5(3):216-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28254128 (View on PubMed)

Al-Zaiti SS, Pietrasik G, Carey MG, Alhamaydeh M, Canty JM, Fallavollita JA. The role of heart rate variability, heart rate turbulence, and deceleration capacity in predicting cause-specific mortality in chronic heart failure. J Electrocardiol. 2019 Jan-Feb;52:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30476644 (View on PubMed)

Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 28;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29034226 (View on PubMed)

Bullinga JR, Alharethi R, Schram MS, Bristow MR, Gilbert EM. Changes in heart rate variability are correlated to hemodynamic improvement with chronic CARVEDILOL therapy in heart failure. J Card Fail. 2005 Dec;11(9):693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.06.435.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16360965 (View on PubMed)

Tsuji H, Larson MG, Venditti FJ Jr, Manders ES, Evans JC, Feldman CL, Levy D. Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1996 Dec 1;94(11):2850-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.11.2850.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8941112 (View on PubMed)

Berryhill S, Morton CJ, Dean A, Berryhill A, Provencio-Dean N, Patel SI, Estep L, Combs D, Mashaqi S, Gerald LB, Krishnan JA, Parthasarathy S. Effect of wearables on sleep in healthy individuals: a randomized crossover trial and validation study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 May 15;16(5):775-783. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8356. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32043961 (View on PubMed)

Sack S, Wende CM, Nagele H, Katz A, Bauer WR, Barr CS, Malinowski K, Schwacke H, Leyva F, Proff J, Berdyshev S, Paul V. Potential value of automated daily screening of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator diagnostics for prediction of major cardiovascular events: results from Home-CARE (Home Monitoring in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Sep;13(9):1019-27. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr089.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21852311 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.whoop.com/experience/

WHOOP measures heart rate, respiratory rate, Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Resting Heart Rate (RHR), and sleep duration (broken down into sleep stages)..

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY15557

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.