Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-30
2022-11-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will test whether two weeks of practice of a self-control exercise (avoiding consumption of sweet foods), compared to wait list, will increase adherence during a subsequent 10-week trial of BFRB self-help.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Awareness Enhancement and Monitoring Device for Treatment of Trichotillomania
NCT01654523
TicHelper: A Computerized Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT)
NCT02413216
Compassion-Based Resiliency Training (CBRT) Intervention on Racism-based Stress
NCT06146218
Tx for Child Sexual Behavior Problems
NCT02625571
Treatment of Severe Destructive Behavior: FCT Versus Wait-List Control
NCT02483572
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Average outcomes of stop pulling.com were thus modest, but the investigators see a couple of ways to extend this work in the proposed project. First, the coverage of BFRB is expanded by including stop picking.com. Second, web-based self-help will be tested as a free-standing intervention, the way it is offered to the public. In the previous research, stop pulling.com was the first phase of a stepped care program, to be followed \[if desired\] by in-person therapy. This could have biased the sample by limiting it to residents of the Washington, DC area and by attracting some who were not interested in web-based self-help and only wanted the in-person therapy. Consistent with this concern, 19% of participants never tried the self-help program. Third and most importantly, a preliminary self-control intervention intended to increase adherence to web-based self-help will be tested. Nonadherence is the main problem for self-help in behavioral health in general, and in BFRB in particular. In the earllier study of stop pulling.com, participants logged on and entered data on a median of just 12.5 days (out of the intended 70) in a 10-week span. Those who used it more tended to get more benefit, but the challenge is how to increase adherence overall.
Adherence to web-based self-help may be seen as requiring self-control because its costs are borne immediately (e.g., somewhat tedious assessments such as self-monitoring logs), whereas the benefits are probabilistic and delayed (reduction of symptoms over a period of weeks). Just as someone taking up a new exercise routine has to do something effortful and perhaps disagreeable at first in order to (likely) gain later benefits, so too the person with a BFRB needs to log data regarding urges or pulling/picking episodes in a meticulous manner in the hope of eventually getting useful individualized suggestions, implementing them, and (probably) reducing symptom severity. The method for improving self-control to be tested in this project derives from the "strength" model of self-control, in which willpower is considered analogous to a muscle. Research supports two key implications of this model, that exertion of self-control temporarily depletes capacity and impairs performance on other tasks (e.g., holding a hand grip as long as one can makes it harder to choose a healthy snack rather than chocolate), but that practicing self-control builds up self-control strength over time.
Approach: In this study 40 participants (20 hair pullers, 20 skin pickers-10 of each in each experimental condition) will be randomly assigned after a pretest of BFRB severity to one of two conditions: (a) 2-week self-control task vs. (b) 2-week wait list, followed in each condition by paid access to web-based self-help for 10 weeks and then post-test. The self-control intervention asks the participant to avoid eating sweet foods and to report via email each day how well they were able to do so. Smokers who performed this task were significantly better able to maintain abstinence after smoking cessation than were those in a control condition. The main dependent variable will be adherence, the number of days (out of 70) on which the participant logged in and entered data on their behavior. Secondary outcomes include change in BFRB symptoms and qualitative feedback on the self-control task and the self-help program.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Self-control
two-week period of practicing self-control (attempting to avoid eating sweet foods) and self-monitoring success in doing so
self-control
avoiding eating sweets as a way of building self-control strength
wait list
waiting 2 weeks after baseline assessment before gaining access to web-based self-help
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
self-control
avoiding eating sweets as a way of building self-control strength
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have regular access to the Internet
* age 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria
* suicidal thoughts
* major depression
* psychosis
* severe anxiety
* substance abuse.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David A. F. Haaga
Professor of Psychology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
American University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Mellon2020CAS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.