Risk Factors of Chinese Kidney Transplant Recipients DSA Based on MPA Immunosuppressive Regimen
NCT ID: NCT04444843
Last Updated: 2022-05-27
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Clinical Phase
PHASE4
Total Enrollment
300 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2021-01-22
Study Completion Date
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
THE INCIDENCE AND INFLUENTIAL FACTORS OF DSA IN CHINESE RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH MPA-BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMEN： A MULTI-CENTER CLINICAL STUDY (TIAIFOD STUDY)
Study procedure Investigators at participating centers will identify patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and do not violate any exclusion criteria. Informed consent will be obtained upon entry into the study according to national regulations. Patients will be enrolled into the study and clinical data of patient history will be collected. Clinical data will be collected prospectively up to a total period of 12 months.
Study procedure Investigators at participating centers will identify patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and do not violate any exclusion criteria. Informed consent will be obtained upon entry into the study according to national regulations. Patients will be enrolled into the study and clinical data of patient history will be collected. Clinical data will be collected prospectively up to a total period of 12 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standard Therapy or Individualized Immunosuppression For Lowering Adverse Event Risk
NCT04473924
Infection
Transplant;Failure,Kidney
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
Reducing Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) Strength in Maintenance Kidney Transplant Recipients (DSA Study)
NCT01044303
Transplant; Failure, Kidney
COMPLETED
PHASE4
MYREPTIC-N® or MY-REPT® in Stable Patients After Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT06044493
Kidney Transplant
RECRUITING
PHASE4
Study of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Adult de Novo Renal Transplant Patients
NCT00149903
Renal Transplant
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Impact of Lymphocyte Anti-metabolite Immunosuppressions on Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibody and Kidney Graft Outcome
NCT03794492
Kidney Transplant
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Medical history and Kidney transplantation This will include age at transplantation, gender, race, weight, height of both recipient and donor; Recipients: previous history ,BMI ,primary kidney disease including biopsy proven diagnosis (if present), historic dialysis，pregnancy history (female). Donor: the catalogue (DCD,DBD,DBCD), ECD or not，the cause of death, received CPR or not; zero biopsy results if done, ABO blood type match, HLA-MM, cold and warm ischemic time.
Clinical data at baseline and 12months follow up period:
Clinical assessments, laboratory, comorbidity, immunosuppressive therapy, and selected concomitant therapy (anti-hypertension anti-hyperlipidemics, anti-diabetics and drugs known to affect renal function) will be collected at transplant day（Day 0, visit 0）and 8 subsequent visits scheduled Day 3, Week1, Week2, Week 4，Week 12，Week 26，Week 40，Week 52 post transplantation. MPA-AUC, acute rejection episodes and graft loss will be collected at visits scheduled Day 3, Week 1，Week 2, Week 4，Week 12， Week 26(6 month)，Week 40，Week 52 (12 month) post transplantation. On day 3, MPA-AUC will be tested by full time sample (0h,0.5h,1h,2h,3h,4h,6h,8h,10h,12h post receiving MMF). LSS (0h, 0.5h, 2h post receiving MMF) will be used for testing MPA-AUC on other visits. PRA will be tested on week 4, week 12, week 26, week 52. If PRA is positive, DSA will be tested following once. All the PRA and DSA MFI and phenotype will be collected（including the clinical-drive test）.
Statistical analysis:
The primary endpoint in this study is the incidence of DSA formation in 12-months post-transplantation in Chinese kidney transplant recipients with MMF-based IS regimen. The proportion and its 95% CI will be provided.
The influential factors of DSA formation will be estimated using logistic regression including relevant influential factors, where the influential factors are defined as {age, gender of donor / recipients recipient: BMI, blood transfusion, previous AR （before DSA appears）, ECD , cold ischemia time, HLA-MM, Tac trough concentration, MPA-AUC, DGF, introduction therapy (including use or not and the drugs )}. .
The full MPA-AUC0-12h will be calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The calculated formula with Limited Sample Strategy (LSS) will be established to predict the MPA-AUC0-12h in the Chinese patients. Correlation coefficients will be calculated and multiple stepwise regression analysis will be used to determine the time points and best equation for evaluating MPA-AUC0-12h.
Estimates for the time-to-event variable(s), such as Overall Survival(OS), will be obtained by using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) approach together with associated 95% CI.
The other secondary endpoints will be summarized descriptively depended on the variable type. The comparison between patients with and without DSA-positive will be performed according to the variable type.
Clinical data at baseline and 12months follow up period:
Clinical assessments, laboratory, comorbidity, immunosuppressive therapy, and selected concomitant therapy (anti-hypertension anti-hyperlipidemics, anti-diabetics and drugs known to affect renal function) will be collected at transplant day（Day 0, visit 0）and 8 subsequent visits scheduled Day 3, Week1, Week2, Week 4，Week 12，Week 26，Week 40，Week 52 post transplantation. MPA-AUC, acute rejection episodes and graft loss will be collected at visits scheduled Day 3, Week 1，Week 2, Week 4，Week 12， Week 26(6 month)，Week 40，Week 52 (12 month) post transplantation. On day 3, MPA-AUC will be tested by full time sample (0h,0.5h,1h,2h,3h,4h,6h,8h,10h,12h post receiving MMF). LSS (0h, 0.5h, 2h post receiving MMF) will be used for testing MPA-AUC on other visits. PRA will be tested on week 4, week 12, week 26, week 52. If PRA is positive, DSA will be tested following once. All the PRA and DSA MFI and phenotype will be collected（including the clinical-drive test）.
Statistical analysis:
The primary endpoint in this study is the incidence of DSA formation in 12-months post-transplantation in Chinese kidney transplant recipients with MMF-based IS regimen. The proportion and its 95% CI will be provided.
The influential factors of DSA formation will be estimated using logistic regression including relevant influential factors, where the influential factors are defined as {age, gender of donor / recipients recipient: BMI, blood transfusion, previous AR （before DSA appears）, ECD , cold ischemia time, HLA-MM, Tac trough concentration, MPA-AUC, DGF, introduction therapy (including use or not and the drugs )}. .
The full MPA-AUC0-12h will be calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The calculated formula with Limited Sample Strategy (LSS) will be established to predict the MPA-AUC0-12h in the Chinese patients. Correlation coefficients will be calculated and multiple stepwise regression analysis will be used to determine the time points and best equation for evaluating MPA-AUC0-12h.
Estimates for the time-to-event variable(s), such as Overall Survival(OS), will be obtained by using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) approach together with associated 95% CI.
The other secondary endpoints will be summarized descriptively depended on the variable type. The comparison between patients with and without DSA-positive will be performed according to the variable type.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Kidney Transplant Recipients
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
To estimate the incidence of DSA formation during 12-months post-transplantation
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mycophenolate Mofetil Capsules
The dosage of mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept) will be decided by the investigator and should be adjusted according to clinical response or therapeutic drug monitoring. It is not allowed to switch to other MPAs. When MMF is discontinued but is not switched to other MPA, the patients will be followed until the end of study.
Group Type
OTHER
Mycophenolate Mofetil Capsules
Intervention Type
DRUG
Patients who received MMF+TAC+ Corticosteroids immunosuppressive regimen as first choice post transplantation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mycophenolate Mofetil Capsules
Patients who received MMF+TAC+ Corticosteroids immunosuppressive regimen as first choice post transplantation
Intervention Type
DRUG
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Other MPAs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female kidney transplant recipients from 18 to 65 years of age (including 18 \& 65 years old patients)
* Single organ and first kidney transplant recipients from donation after citizen's death
* Patients who received MMF+TAC+ Corticosteroids immunosuppressive regimen as first choice post transplantation
* Pre-transplant PRA is negative (0%)
* One serum pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 25mlU/Ml for patients of childbearing potential before enrolled. A second test should be performed 8-10 days later. Repeat pregnancy tests should be performed during routine follow-up visits. Results of all pregnancy tests should be discussed with the patient. Patients should be instructed to consult their physician immediately should pregnancy occur. For patients to be included in the study, negative result must be obtained. And highly effective contraception for women of childbearing potential. Contraception must be taken before beginning study drug therapy, during therapy and for 6 weeks after the last dose of study medication
* Single organ and first kidney transplant recipients from donation after citizen's death
* Patients who received MMF+TAC+ Corticosteroids immunosuppressive regimen as first choice post transplantation
* Pre-transplant PRA is negative (0%)
* One serum pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 25mlU/Ml for patients of childbearing potential before enrolled. A second test should be performed 8-10 days later. Repeat pregnancy tests should be performed during routine follow-up visits. Results of all pregnancy tests should be discussed with the patient. Patients should be instructed to consult their physician immediately should pregnancy occur. For patients to be included in the study, negative result must be obtained. And highly effective contraception for women of childbearing potential. Contraception must be taken before beginning study drug therapy, during therapy and for 6 weeks after the last dose of study medication
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who do not receive MMF
* Patients who are re-transplantation or multiple organ transplantation recipients
* Female patients who are pregnant or lactating
* Patients who have any form of substance abuse, psychological illness or any other condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the patient's ability to understand the requirements of the study.
* Patients who would have received another investigational drug within 30 days preceding the enrollment, received prohibited immunosuppressant medications prior to transplant
* Patients who are using AZA, MTX, CTX or will use these drugs post-transplantation
* Known contraindications to TAC , corticosteroids, MMF
* Patients who have active peptic ulcer
* Patients who have severe cardiac or lung disease
* Patient who have active hepatica disease
* Patients who have a history of cancer, except successfully treated localized nonmelanocytic skin cancer
* Patients who would not be available for routine study visits or follow-up, or not being followed by an accredited laboratory.
* Patients who are re-transplantation or multiple organ transplantation recipients
* Female patients who are pregnant or lactating
* Patients who have any form of substance abuse, psychological illness or any other condition, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the patient's ability to understand the requirements of the study.
* Patients who would have received another investigational drug within 30 days preceding the enrollment, received prohibited immunosuppressant medications prior to transplant
* Patients who are using AZA, MTX, CTX or will use these drugs post-transplantation
* Known contraindications to TAC , corticosteroids, MMF
* Patients who have active peptic ulcer
* Patients who have severe cardiac or lung disease
* Patient who have active hepatica disease
* Patients who have a history of cancer, except successfully treated localized nonmelanocytic skin cancer
* Patients who would not be available for routine study visits or follow-up, or not being followed by an accredited laboratory.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
65 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wujun Xue, Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
China
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, Held PJ, Port FK. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 2;341(23):1725-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303.
Reference Type
RESULT
Huang J, Millis JM, Mao Y, Millis MA, Sang X, Zhong S. Voluntary organ donation system adapted to Chinese cultural values and social reality. Liver Transpl. 2015 Apr;21(4):419-22. doi: 10.1002/lt.24069. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
Reference Type
RESULT
Miettinen J, Perasaari J, Lauronen J, Qvist E, Valta H, Pakarinen M, Merenmies J, Jalanko H. Donor-specific HLA antibodies and graft function in children after renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012 Jun;27(6):1011-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2101-4. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Reference Type
RESULT
Meier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B. Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am J Transplant. 2004 Mar;4(3):378-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00332.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Ginevri F, Nocera A, Comoli P, Innocente A, Cioni M, Parodi A, Fontana I, Magnasco A, Nocco A, Tagliamacco A, Sementa A, Ceriolo P, Ghio L, Zecca M, Cardillo M, Garibotto G, Ghiggeri GM, Poli F. Posttransplant de novo donor-specific hla antibodies identify pediatric kidney recipients at risk for late antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2012 Dec;12(12):3355-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04251.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
Reference Type
RESULT
Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Karpinski M, Ho J, Storsley LJ, Goldberg A, Birk PE, Rush DN, Nickerson PW. Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2012 May;12(5):1157-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04013.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
Reference Type
RESULT
Everly MJ, Rebellato LM, Haisch CE, Ozawa M, Parker K, Briley KP, Catrou PG, Bolin P, Kendrick WT, Kendrick SA, Harland RC, Terasaki PI. Incidence and impact of de novo donor-specific alloantibody in primary renal allografts. Transplantation. 2013 Feb 15;95(3):410-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31827d62e3.
Reference Type
RESULT
Hidalgo LG, Campbell PM, Sis B, Einecke G, Mengel M, Chang J, Sellares J, Reeve J, Halloran PF. De novo donor-specific antibody at the time of kidney transplant biopsy associates with microvascular pathology and late graft failure. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2532-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02800.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Pochinco D, Birk PE, Ho J, Karpinski M, Goldberg A, Storsley L, Rush DN, Nickerson PW. Rates and determinants of progression to graft failure in kidney allograft recipients with de novo donor-specific antibody. Am J Transplant. 2015 Nov;15(11):2921-30. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13347. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
Reference Type
RESULT
Cooper JE, Gralla J, Chan L, Wiseman AC. Clinical significance of post kidney transplant de novo DSA in otherwise stable grafts. Clin Transpl. 2011:359-64.
Reference Type
RESULT
DeVos JM, Patel SJ, Burns KM, Dilioglou S, Gaber LW, Knight RJ, Gaber AO, Land GA. De novo donor specific antibodies and patient outcomes in renal transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2011:351-8.
Reference Type
RESULT
de Kort H, Willicombe M, Brookes P, Dominy KM, Santos-Nunez E, Galliford JW, Chan K, Taube D, McLean AG, Cook HT, Roufosse C. Microcirculation inflammation associates with outcome in renal transplant patients with de novo donor-specific antibodies. Am J Transplant. 2013 Feb;13(2):485-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04325.x. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
Reference Type
RESULT
Sharma A, Lewis JR, Lim WH, Palmer S, Strippoli G, Chapman JR, Alexander SI, Craig JC, Wong G. Renal transplant outcomes and de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies: a systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1472-1480. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy077.
Reference Type
RESULT
O'Leary JG, Samaniego M, Barrio MC, Potena L, Zeevi A, Djamali A, Cozzi E. The Influence of Immunosuppressive Agents on the Risk of De Novo Donor-Specific HLA Antibody Production in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2016 Jan;100(1):39-53. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000869.
Reference Type
RESULT
Pratschke J, Dragun D, Hauser IA, Horn S, Mueller TF, Schemmer P, Thaiss F. Immunological risk assessment: The key to individualized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2016 Apr;30(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Reference Type
RESULT
Smith JM, Martz K, Blydt-Hansen TD. Pediatric kidney transplant practice patterns and outcome benchmarks, 1987-2010: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies. Pediatr Transplant. 2013 Mar;17(2):149-57. doi: 10.1111/petr.12034. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
Reference Type
RESULT
Filler G, Lepage N. To what extent does the understanding of pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil influence its prescription. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004 Sep;19(9):962-5. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1571-4. Epub 2004 Jul 15.
Reference Type
RESULT
Le Meur Y, Buchler M, Thierry A, Caillard S, Villemain F, Lavaud S, Etienne I, Westeel PF, Hurault de Ligny B, Rostaing L, Thervet E, Szelag JC, Rerolle JP, Rousseau A, Touchard G, Marquet P. Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007 Nov;7(11):2496-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01983.x. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
Reference Type
RESULT
Tonshoff B, David-Neto E, Ettenger R, Filler G, van Gelder T, Goebel J, Kuypers DR, Tsai E, Vinks AA, Weber LT, Zimmerhackl LB. Pediatric aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in renal transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2011 Apr;25(2):78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
Reference Type
RESULT
Le Meur Y, Borrows R, Pescovitz MD, Budde K, Grinyo J, Bloom R, Gaston R, Walker RG, Kuypers D, van Gelder T, Kiberd B. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolates in kidney transplantation: report of The Transplantation Society consensus meeting. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2011 Apr;25(2):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Mar 30. No abstract available.
Reference Type
RESULT
Pawinski T, Hale M, Korecka M, Fitzsimmons WE, Shaw LM. Limited sampling strategy for the estimation of mycophenolic acid area under the curve in adult renal transplant patients treated with concomitant tacrolimus. Clin Chem. 2002 Sep;48(9):1497-504.
Reference Type
RESULT
Magee JC, Krishnan SM, Benfield MR, Hsu DT, Shneider BL. Pediatric transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006. Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):935-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02172.x.
Reference Type
RESULT
Chen B, Gu Z, Chen H, Zhang W, Fen X, Cai W, Fan Q. Establishment of high-performance liquid chromatography and enzyme multiplied immunoassay technology methods for determination of free mycophenolic acid and its application in Chinese liver transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit. 2010 Oct;32(5):653-60. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181f01397.
Reference Type
RESULT
Filler G, Todorova EK, Bax K, Alvarez-Elias AC, Huang SH, Kobrzynski MC. Minimum mycophenolic acid levels are associated with donor-specific antibody formation. Pediatr Transplant. 2016 Feb;20(1):34-8. doi: 10.1111/petr.12637. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
Reference Type
RESULT
Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003;3 Suppl 4:114-25. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.3.s4.11.x. No abstract available.
Reference Type
RESULT
Mallon DH, Summers DM, Bradley JA, Pettigrew GJ. Defining delayed graft function after renal transplantation: simplest is best. Transplantation. 2013 Nov 27;96(10):885-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a19348.
Reference Type
RESULT
Czyzewski L, Wyzgal J, Czyzewska E, Kurowski A, Sierdzinski J, Labus A, Truszewski Z, Szarpak L. Performance of the MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault Formulas in Relation to Nutritional Status in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc. 2016 Jun;48(5):1494-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.01.083.
Reference Type
RESULT
Malheiro J, Tafulo S, Dias L, Martins LS, Fonseca I, Beirao I, Castro-Henriques A, Cabrita A. Analysis of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies characteristics for prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2015 Mar;32(2):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
Reference Type
RESULT
Haas M, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, Roufosse C, Glotz D, Seron D, Nankivell BJ, Halloran PF, Colvin RB, Akalin E, Alachkar N, Bagnasco S, Bouatou Y, Becker JU, Cornell LD, Duong van Huyen JP, Gibson IW, Kraus ES, Mannon RB, Naesens M, Nickeleit V, Nickerson P, Segev DL, Singh HK, Stegall M, Randhawa P, Racusen L, Solez K, Mengel M. The Banff 2017 Kidney Meeting Report: Revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials. Am J Transplant. 2018 Feb;18(2):293-307. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14625. Epub 2018 Jan 21.
Reference Type
RESULT
van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, Budde K, Kuypers D, Tyden G, Lohmus A, Sommerer C, Hartmann A, Le Meur Y, Oellerich M, Holt DW, Tonshoff B, Keown P, Campbell S, Mamelok RD. Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2008 Oct 27;86(8):1043-51. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318186f98a.
Reference Type
RESULT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ML40754
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
A Study of Thymoglobuline® Induction Therapy in Adult Recipients of Donated After Cardiac Death Kidney Transplant
NCT03099122
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Iguratimod in Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT02839941
UNKNOWN
NA
Efficacy and Safety of Deoxyspergualin in Renal Transplant Patient With Chronic Rejection
NCT01052259
TERMINATED
NA
Study of Rituximab to Treat Chronic Renal Transplant Rejection
NCT00476164
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of MPA in Stable Renal Transplant Patients
NCT00780429
UNKNOWN
Standard- Versus Reduced-dose Tacrolimus Combined With Generic Mycophenolate Mofetil in De Novo Renal Transplantation
NCT03968588
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Sequential Targeting of Cluster of Differentiation 52 (CD52) and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Allows Early Minimization Therapy in Kidney Transplantation
NCT02711202
COMPLETED
NA
A Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Cyclosporin, Without Concomitant Corticosteroids, After a First Renal Transplant
NCT00200551
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Clinical Outcome of Delayed or Standard Prograf Together With Induction Therapy Followed by Conversion to Advagraf in Donation After Cardiac (or Circulatory) Death (DCD) Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT03644485
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Assessment of Biomarker-Guided CNI Substitution In Kidney Transplantation
NCT05917522
RECRUITING
PHASE2
Rituximab Desensitization Therapy for Patients on the Waiting List for Kidney Transplant
NCT00167791
WITHDRAWN
NA
The Safety and Efficacy of CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Monotherapy for CaAMR in Renal Transplantation
NCT05913596
UNKNOWN
NA
Efficacy and Safety of FTY720 Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF, Roche Brand) in de Novo Adult Renal Transplant Recipients
NCT00239863
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Th1, Th2 and Monokine Responses as Risk Factors of Renal Transplant Rejection
NCT00150891
COMPLETED
Comparison of Two Tacrolimus Based Immunosuppressive Regimens in Recipients Receiving Marginal Donor Kidneys
NCT00321113
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) On Anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen)Antibody Levels In Patients Awaiting Cadaveric Renal Transplant.
NCT00446459
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Patients by Dried Blood Spot Assay. Interest and Feasibility.
NCT02830191
COMPLETED
Study Evaluating Cyclosporine Dose Reduction and Cyclosporine Elimination in Chinese Kidney Transplants
NCT00257387
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
Effects of Rituximab and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) on Highly Sensitized Patients Awaiting Renal Transplant
NCT00446251
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Syk Inhibition in MItigating Lung Allograft Rejection (SIMILAR): A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Fostamatinib in Lung Transplant Patients With Donor-Specific Antibodies
NCT06948097
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE1
Examination of Immunosuppression Adjustment Impact on Kidney Function in Liver Transplant
NCT04104438
COMPLETED
PHASE4
A Study of CellCept (Mycophenolate Mofetil) Combined With Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids in Kidney Transplant Patients.
NCT00758602
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Cyclophosphamide Therapy for Refractory Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) in Kidney Transplants
NCT01630538
TERMINATED
PHASE2
A Study of TCD601 in the Induction of Tolerance in Renal Transplantation (PERSPECTIVE)
NCT04803058
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2