Comparison of 3 Ultrasonic Techniques for Measuring the Systolic Pressure Index
NCT ID: NCT04440072
Last Updated: 2020-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-07-17
2021-06-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The recommended measurement was gradually replaced by colour or pulsed Doppler without validation of these techniques.
The objective of our study is to compare these two techniques (color Doppler and pulsed Doppler in echodoppler) with respect to the gold standard (continuous Doppler) for ABI measurement.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Ankle-Brachial Index Measurement Using a Specific Oscillometric Device vs. the Doppler Method
NCT03511612
Comparison of Huntleigh Dopplex DMX Digital Doppler Arterial Waveform With the Gold Standard of Ultrasound Duplex Arterial Waveform
NCT05373875
Validation of a Novel Oscillometric-Based Algorithm for Determination of the Ankle-Brachial Index
NCT01165437
A New Technique for Determining Limb Occlusion Pressure
NCT02620722
Ankle Arterial Doppler Waveform Assessment For Surveillance Following Lower Limb Revascularisation
NCT06619223
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with trans-tibial or more proximal amputation
* Patient with extensive trophic disorder not allowing measurement
* Patient with subgonal bypass
* Known bilateral sub-clavian stenoses
* Patient deprived of liberty or under a measure of legal protection
* Interned patient for the treatment of a psychiatric or physical illness
* Patients who are legally incompetent, under the protection of justice, under guardianship or trusteeship.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Caen
Caen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Direction de la recherche et de l'enseignement
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Damien LANNEELE
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-037
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.