Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-25
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) MicroRNA Expression in Vivo and Immune Evasion Correlates
NCT00677482
Cell Mediated Immunity and the Prediction of CMV Infection In Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
NCT00436384
Quantiferon - Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the Prediction of CMV Infection In High Risk Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
NCT00817908
Valganciclovir for Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Patients
NCT00730769
AntiCMV molécules Monitoring in Real-life in Stem Cell Recipients
NCT04690933
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the rate of CMV breakthrough in lung transplant patients who are CMV mismatched and receiving prophylaxis. The rates of negative side effects caused by the antiviral prophylaxis will also be monitored. For patients who do have a breakthrough of CMV viremia while on study the investigator will also evaluate the rate of resistance mutations.
Hypothesis:
The investigator wants to demonstrate that breakthrough CMV DNAemia is common in CMV mismatch lung transplant recipients on ganciclovir/valganciclovir prophylaxis. In addition, the investigator will show that leukopenia and neutropenia related to prolonged prophylaxis is very common and discontinuation of ganciclovir/valganciclovir prophylaxis because of side effects explains most cases of breakthrough CMV DNAemia. The investigators findings will be relevant because they will answer the following questions:
1. Prophylaxis with ganciclovir/valganciclovir in mismatch lung transplant patients should include intensive CMV DNA monitoring.
2. Side effects related to the use of ganciclovir/valganciclovir can result in potential life-threatening infections due to the development of neutropenia and increased cost due to the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.
3. Alternative prophylaxis with new antivirals with safer profile of side effects would result in a safer profile of adverse events. As resistance to ganciclovir may lead to death, the development of CMV infection in patients receiving antivirals targeting different enzymes than those targeted by ganciclovir/valganciclovir will not prevent future use of ganciclovir/valganciclovir to treat CMV infection or disease.
Justification:
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common opportunistic infection in lung transplantation leading to direct and indirect effects that can result in life threatening complications. The risk of CMV infection is highest in CMV seronegative lung recipients from CMV seropositive donor (CMV mismatch). Antiviral prophylaxis for 6 to12 months with valganciclovir is indicated in CMV mismatch lung transplant recipients according to International Guidelines. Despite prolonged antiviral prophylaxis, the risk of CMV infection post-prophylaxis is high in this group of patients. Valganciclovir was approved for antiviral prophylaxis in organ transplant patients in 2004. Rates of breakthrough CMV infection may be higher after 6 months of prophylaxis due to an increased risk of bone marrow toxicity and neutropenia from Valganciclovir that may lead to temporary prophylaxis discontinuation.
Resistance to ganciclovir is a major complication in all solid organ transplant patients, but lung transplant recipients are the subgroup of patients at highest risk. The rate of ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection in CMV mismatch lung transplant recipients is the highest among all organ transplants and its occurrence is associated with increased risk of death. Although CMV mismatch lung transplantation has been found to be a risk factor for ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection in most of the studies, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood. Discontinuation of valganciclovir can lead to CMV replication with exposure to sub-therapeutic levels of ganciclovir in blood, and this may lead to the development of antiviral resistance.
Objectives:
1. To evaluate the incidence of breakthrough CMV infection in CMV mismatch lung transplant patients receiving 6-12 months antiviral prophylaxis with ganciclovir/valganciclovir.
2. To evaluate the rates of leukopenia, neutropenia and antiviral prophylaxis discontinuation due to side effects of antiviral prophylaxis with ganciclovir/valganciclovir in CMV mismatch lung transplant patients.
3. To evaluate the rates of ganciclovir/valganciclovir resistance mutations in CMV DNA from mismatch lung transplant patients with breakthrough CMV viremia.
Research Method/Procedures:
This will be a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, non-interventional study in 40 CMV mismatch lung transplant patients receiving standard of care prophylaxis according to each center. At baseline the patients medical history will be reviewed with them. Post transplant weeks 1 to 24 or 52 a CMV Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) will be done every two weeks. Standard of care blood work and the patients chart will be monitored to look for any relevant side effects or changes in medication. In case CMV viremia is detected during prophylaxis, the local PI can decide either to treat the CMV infection with therapeutic dose of antivirals (ganciclovir, valganciclovir or Foscarnet) or to maintain prophylaxis and CMV PCR monitoring. In all cases of CMV breakthrough viremia, a whole blood or plasma sample will be sent to Provincial Microbiology Lab in Edmonton to perform antiviral resistance by next-generation sequencing. From post transplant weeks 24 to 36 or 52 to 64 weekly CMV PCR will be done as per standard of care, all other standard of care blood work will also be monitored. Chart reviews will be completed to look for any relevant side effects.
Plan for Data Analysis:
For the analysis of data the investigator will have the support of the Northern Alberta Clinical Trials and Research Centre (NACTRC). Incidence rate of breakthrough CMV viremia, leukopenia, neutropenia and severe neutropenia will be calculated as number of case per 1,000 patients/week. The percentage of CMV infection post-prophylaxis in patients with and without breakthrough CMV infection will be compared by Fisher's exact test. Cox-regression analysis will be performed to identify independent variables associated with CMV breakthrough viremia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 years or older.
* Receipt of antiviral prophylaxis with valganciclovir as per local protocol with a duration of 6 or 12 months after transplantation.
* Monitoring of CMV DNAemia post-prophylaxis for at least 12 weeks as per local protocol.
* Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Neutropenia (\< 1.0) pre-transplantation.
* Living-donor lung transplantation.
* Lung re-transplantation.
* Pre-transplant immunodeficiency
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr. Carlos Cervera
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00093295
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.