Cervical Erector Spinae Block Versus Interscalene Block for Shoulder Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04435236

Last Updated: 2021-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

94 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Severe pain after arthroscopic surgery is a common experience for the patients . Different regional anesthetic technique has been applicated for postoperative pain relief . The main goal of regional anesthesia regarding postoperative pain relief is to reduce opioid requirements. The most commonly used approach is Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), since it provides effective postoperative analgesia upto 12 hours. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported for a variety of indications such as thoracic and abdominal surgery. Recently, a novel description of a T2-3 erector spinae plane (ESP) as an alternative to a BP block for an upper extremity surgical procedure. Following these studies, direct cervical ESP block has been recently performed successfully as both clinical and cadaveric study. The investigators hypothesized that cervical ESP block is as effective as (non-inferior) interscalene brachial plexus block in terms of postoperative analgesia of shoulder surgery. To evaluate the effectiveness of the cervical ESP block, the investigators have designed a randomized study. Primary aim is to evaluate the postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores by Numeric Rating Scale (0 to 10 point scale).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study has been designed as a prospective, randomized and single-blind trial. Local ethics committee of Ataturk University has approved the study (B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/142). After obtaining the patients' written informed consents, we will include a total number of 94 patients (47 patients for each group). The inclusion criteria of the study was considered as age between 18-80, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III, eligible for regional anesthesia, and unilateral shoulder surgery. The patients who have clotting disorder, contra-indication for regional anesthesia, infection on the injection site, chronic opioid usage, previous same side shoulder surgery, severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) , diaphragmatic paralysis, BMI 35 or over will be excluded. A computer-generated randomization program will be used to allocate the patient into two groups. Interscalene brachial plexus block group will be named as Group ISB (n=47) and cervical ESP block group will be named as Group cESP (n=47). The assessor of the outcomes will be blinded to the study groups of the patients. Both ISB block and cervical ESP block will be performed under ultrasound guidance in the block room preoperatively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Acute Opioid Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cervical ESP block group

Cervical ESP block will be performed as described by Elsharkawy at al. (7).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cervical ESP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cervical ESP block will be performed as described by Elsharkawy at al. (7). ISB block will be performed in transverse orientation of the ultrasound probe to visualize the trunks of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles

ISB Block group

ISB block will be performed in transverse orientation of the ultrasound probe to visualize the trunks of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Cervical ESP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cervical ESP block will be performed as described by Elsharkawy at al. (7). ISB block will be performed in transverse orientation of the ultrasound probe to visualize the trunks of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cervical ESP block

Cervical ESP block will be performed as described by Elsharkawy at al. (7). ISB block will be performed in transverse orientation of the ultrasound probe to visualize the trunks of the brachial plexus between the anterior and middle scalene muscles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ISB Block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18-80
2. ASA I-III
3. Eligible for regional anesthesia
4. Unilateral shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria

1. The patients who have clotting disorder
2. Contra-endication for regional anesthesia
3. Infection on the injection site
4. Chronic opioid usage
5. Previous same side shoulder surgery
6. Severe COPD
7. Diaphragmatic paralysis
8. BMI 35 or over
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ataturk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ilker Ince

Associated Prof. Dr. MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

İlker İnce, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ataturk University Anesthesiology Clinical Research Office

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

İlker İnce, MD

Role: CONTACT

+905052949840

Mehmet Aksoy, MD

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fredrickson MJ, Krishnan S, Chen CY. Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery: a critical appraisal and review of current techniques. Anaesthesia. 2010 Jun;65(6):608-624. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06231.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20565394 (View on PubMed)

Demir U, Ince I, Aksoy M, Dostbil A, Ari MA, Sulak MM, Kose M, Tanios M, Ozmen O. The Effect of Pre-emptive Dexketoprofen Administration on Postoperative Pain Management in Patients with Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. J Invest Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):82-88. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1576809. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30966835 (View on PubMed)

Ritchie ED, Tong D, Chung F, Norris AM, Miniaci A, Vairavanathan SD. Suprascapular nerve block for postoperative pain relief in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a new modality? Anesth Analg. 1997 Jun;84(6):1306-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199706000-00024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9174311 (View on PubMed)

Abdallah FW, Wijeysundera DN, Laupacis A, Brull R, Mocon A, Hussain N, Thorpe KE, Chan VWS. Subomohyoid Anterior Suprascapular Block versus Interscalene Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):839-853. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003132.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32044802 (View on PubMed)

Tsui BCH, Mohler D, Caruso TJ, Horn JL. Cervical erector spinae plane block catheter using a thoracic approach: an alternative to brachial plexus blockade for forequarter amputation. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;66(1):119-120. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1170-7. Epub 2018 Jun 4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29868941 (View on PubMed)

Hamadnalla H, Elsharkawy H, Shimada T, Maheshwari K, Esa WAS, Tsui BCH. Cervical erector spinae plane block catheter for shoulder disarticulation surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;66(9):1129-1131. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01421-9. Epub 2019 Jun 3. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31161549 (View on PubMed)

Elsharkawy H, Ince I, Hamadnalla H, Drake RL, Tsui BCH. Cervical erector spinae plane block: a cadaver study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Jul;45(7):552-556. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101154. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32321860 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/142

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.