The Effects of a Health-social Partnership Program for Discharged Non-frail Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT04434742

Last Updated: 2020-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-19

Study Completion Date

2020-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous studies supporting discharged patients are hospital-based which admission criteria tend to include mainly those with complex needs and/or specific disease conditions. This study captured the service gap where these non-frail older patients might have no specific medical problem upon discharge but they might encounter residual health and social issues when returning home.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To compare the effect of a community-based health-social partnership program with usual care for discharged community-dwelling non-frail older adults on their health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, and use of health services.

Design: A randomized controlled trial. Participants: Discharged community-dwelling non-frail older adults from an emergency medical ward in an intervention (n=37) and a control (n=38) group.

Interventions: Discharged older adults were randomized to receive usual care or complex interventions, including structured assessment, health education, goal empowerment, and care coordination supported by a health-social team.

Main measures: The outcomes were measured at pre-intervention (T1) and at three months post-intervention (T2) using the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form, the Modified Barthel Index and the Geriatric Depression Scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Transition Partner Communication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

The subjects in this group receive complex interventions, including structured assessment, health education, goal empowerment, and care coordination supported by a health-social team.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Complex interventions

Intervention Type OTHER

An advanced practice nurse (APN) from a hospital discharge team visited them to familiarize him/herself with their condition and prepare a discharge plan. A face-to-face or telephone call handover between the APN and the project nurse case manager (NCM) was performed before the client was discharged. The past and current medical conditions, medical and nursing management, and follow-up appointments were discussed. After discharge home, the NCM, functioning as the leader of health-social care team, conducted the initial assessment in the first home visit to identify the client's health and social problems within one week of discharge. Community workers, supervised by both the nurse case manager and social worker, provided telephone follow-up and subsequent home visits to monitor the client's progress and provide support when necessary.

Control group

The control group received usual discharge care and community resources that were made available to them as appropriate. A monthly social call was made to each client in the control group in order to exclude social effects. The contents of the social call, such as asking about entertainment and clients' hobbies, were set in the protocol.

Group Type OTHER

Usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

Social call was given to this group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Complex interventions

An advanced practice nurse (APN) from a hospital discharge team visited them to familiarize him/herself with their condition and prepare a discharge plan. A face-to-face or telephone call handover between the APN and the project nurse case manager (NCM) was performed before the client was discharged. The past and current medical conditions, medical and nursing management, and follow-up appointments were discussed. After discharge home, the NCM, functioning as the leader of health-social care team, conducted the initial assessment in the first home visit to identify the client's health and social problems within one week of discharge. Community workers, supervised by both the nurse case manager and social worker, provided telephone follow-up and subsequent home visits to monitor the client's progress and provide support when necessary.

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual care

Social call was given to this group.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* resided in the service areas of the study hospital,
* were aged 60 or over,
* were cognitively competent with a score greater than 26 in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Hong Kong version,
* were living at home before and after discharge from the hospital,
* had scores of \<5 on the Clinical Frailty Scale (Note: a patient is considered to be non-frail if they have a score less than 5), and
* were fit for medical discharge

Exclusion Criteria

* were not able to communicate,
* could not be reached by phone,
* were bed-bound,
* had active psychiatric problems,
* were already engaged in other structured health or social programs, and
* would not be staying in Hong Kong for the three months of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Arkers, Wong

Clinical associate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arkers KC Wong, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Kowloon, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wong AKC, Wong FKY, Ngai JSC, Hung SYK, Li WC. Effectiveness of a health-social partnership program for discharged non-frail older adults: a pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01722-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32912218 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSP002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of a Mobility Program
NCT02674503 COMPLETED NA