The Effectiveness of Peer-to-Peer Community Support to Promote Aging in Place
NCT ID: NCT02308696
Last Updated: 2019-10-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
456 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. To compare the effectiveness of peer-to-peer community support in preventing hospitalization, emergency department (ED) use, and nursing home placement in an at-risk older adult population relative to standard community services.
2. To compare the effect of peer-to-peer community support on intermediary measures of health and wellness such as self-rated health, depression, and anxiety relative to standard community services.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes Of Social Service Programs For Homebound Older Adults
NCT00248924
Systematic Care for Informal Caregivers of Dementia Patients: An Efficient Approach?
NCT00147693
Comparison for the Patient With Alzheimer Disease the Impact of Three Different Groups of Patient Care
NCT01639586
The Effects and Meaning of a Person-centred and Health-promoting Intervention in Home Care Services
NCT02846246
CommunityRx-Dementia + Peer Navigation (CRxDpeer)
NCT07346183
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At all three sites investigators will include 120 older adults in the peer-to-peer support group and 120 in the standard community services group for a total intervention group size of 360 (120 from each site) and 360 in the control group (120 from each site).
Study Outcomes \& Measures To meet the first two aims investigators will (1) compare annualized rates of hospitalization, ED use, and nursing home placement and (2) examine the changes in self-reported health, depression, anxiety, and other measures of well-being in the group receiving peer-to-peer support compared to the group receiving standard community services from baseline to the end of study enrolment. The investigators describe each of our outcomes and additional study measures in detail below. Measures have been translated and used in Spanish and have been shown to be valid or have high reliability in Spanish
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peer-to-peer support (non-randomized)
225 older adults that are currently receiving peer-to-peer support
Peer-to-Peer Support
All three data collection sites run peer-to-peer community support programs. Core program elements include the same program objective, standard definition of who qualifies for peer-to-peer support, the mechanism by which older adults are referred for consideration for peer-support, core elements of training programs for the older adults who volunteer to provide the peer support, and monthly in-service trainings for all volunteers once trained, weekly hours that volunteers spend providing support, and provision of small stipends for volunteers.As they find their role very rewarding, there is very little peer turn-over; the vast majority of peers volunteer for years in this role, until they themselves start requiring services.
Standard Services (non-randomized)
225 older adults will continue receiving standard community services
Standard Community Services
All three data collection sites will continue to provide standard community services to the older adults that are not enrolled in the peer-to-peer support program
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peer-to-Peer Support
All three data collection sites run peer-to-peer community support programs. Core program elements include the same program objective, standard definition of who qualifies for peer-to-peer support, the mechanism by which older adults are referred for consideration for peer-support, core elements of training programs for the older adults who volunteer to provide the peer support, and monthly in-service trainings for all volunteers once trained, weekly hours that volunteers spend providing support, and provision of small stipends for volunteers.As they find their role very rewarding, there is very little peer turn-over; the vast majority of peers volunteer for years in this role, until they themselves start requiring services.
Standard Community Services
All three data collection sites will continue to provide standard community services to the older adults that are not enrolled in the peer-to-peer support program
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ≥65 years of age
* Speaks English or Spanish
* Lives independently in their community year-round
* Meet the community defined criterion for receiving peer-to-peer support (at least one of the following)
* Low income (at or below poverty level)
* On a fixed income that barely meets their living expenses
* Social and/or familial isolation
* Chronic Illness
* Enrolled in the peer-to-peer support program and have an assigned peer volunteer
Exclusion Criteria
* Score ≤ 30 on the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) because they will not have the ability to complete the survey
* State that it is unlikely that they will receive peer-to-peer support services for at least a year. Individuals who are unlikely to receive at least a year of services include those who need short-term help after a surgery and are likely to return to full functioning and those planning to transition to nursing home care or move away.
* Currently receiving hospice services
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Community Place
UNKNOWN
Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles
UNKNOWN
Alpert Jewish Family And Childrens Service
OTHER
Alliance for Children and Families
UNKNOWN
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elizabeth A Jacobs, MD MPP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMadison
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jewish Family Service
Los Angeles, California, United States
Alpert Jewish Family and Children's Service
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Community Place of Greater Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Aliance For Children and Families
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
000001
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2014-1013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.