The Effectiveness of Peer-to-Peer Community Support to Promote Aging in Place

NCT ID: NCT02308696

Last Updated: 2019-10-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

456 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators' overall objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of peer-to-peer support programs in preventing the necessity of acute health care and nursing home services for older adult populations and in promoting their health and wellness. The investigators' Specific Aims are:

1. To compare the effectiveness of peer-to-peer community support in preventing hospitalization, emergency department (ED) use, and nursing home placement in an at-risk older adult population relative to standard community services.
2. To compare the effect of peer-to-peer community support on intermediary measures of health and wellness such as self-rated health, depression, and anxiety relative to standard community services.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will accomplish the aims by conducting a longitudinal comparative-effectiveness study in which at-risk older adult study participants in three communities across the US are followed for 12-months. Using a quasi-experimental design, investigators will compare outcomes in those receiving peer-to-peer community support to those receiving standard community services.

At all three sites investigators will include 120 older adults in the peer-to-peer support group and 120 in the standard community services group for a total intervention group size of 360 (120 from each site) and 360 in the control group (120 from each site).

Study Outcomes \& Measures To meet the first two aims investigators will (1) compare annualized rates of hospitalization, ED use, and nursing home placement and (2) examine the changes in self-reported health, depression, anxiety, and other measures of well-being in the group receiving peer-to-peer support compared to the group receiving standard community services from baseline to the end of study enrolment. The investigators describe each of our outcomes and additional study measures in detail below. Measures have been translated and used in Spanish and have been shown to be valid or have high reliability in Spanish

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wellness Programs Hospitalization Emergency Room

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peer-to-peer support (non-randomized)

225 older adults that are currently receiving peer-to-peer support

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peer-to-Peer Support

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All three data collection sites run peer-to-peer community support programs. Core program elements include the same program objective, standard definition of who qualifies for peer-to-peer support, the mechanism by which older adults are referred for consideration for peer-support, core elements of training programs for the older adults who volunteer to provide the peer support, and monthly in-service trainings for all volunteers once trained, weekly hours that volunteers spend providing support, and provision of small stipends for volunteers.As they find their role very rewarding, there is very little peer turn-over; the vast majority of peers volunteer for years in this role, until they themselves start requiring services.

Standard Services (non-randomized)

225 older adults will continue receiving standard community services

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Community Services

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All three data collection sites will continue to provide standard community services to the older adults that are not enrolled in the peer-to-peer support program

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peer-to-Peer Support

All three data collection sites run peer-to-peer community support programs. Core program elements include the same program objective, standard definition of who qualifies for peer-to-peer support, the mechanism by which older adults are referred for consideration for peer-support, core elements of training programs for the older adults who volunteer to provide the peer support, and monthly in-service trainings for all volunteers once trained, weekly hours that volunteers spend providing support, and provision of small stipends for volunteers.As they find their role very rewarding, there is very little peer turn-over; the vast majority of peers volunteer for years in this role, until they themselves start requiring services.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard Community Services

All three data collection sites will continue to provide standard community services to the older adults that are not enrolled in the peer-to-peer support program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Overall

* ≥65 years of age
* Speaks English or Spanish
* Lives independently in their community year-round
* Meet the community defined criterion for receiving peer-to-peer support (at least one of the following)

* Low income (at or below poverty level)
* On a fixed income that barely meets their living expenses
* Social and/or familial isolation
* Chronic Illness
* Enrolled in the peer-to-peer support program and have an assigned peer volunteer

Exclusion Criteria

* \< 65
* Score ≤ 30 on the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) because they will not have the ability to complete the survey
* State that it is unlikely that they will receive peer-to-peer support services for at least a year. Individuals who are unlikely to receive at least a year of services include those who need short-term help after a surgery and are likely to return to full functioning and those planning to transition to nursing home care or move away.

* Currently receiving hospice services
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Community Place

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alpert Jewish Family And Childrens Service

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alliance for Children and Families

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elizabeth A Jacobs, MD MPP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMadison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jewish Family Service

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Alpert Jewish Family and Children's Service

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Community Place of Greater Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aliance For Children and Families

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

000001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2014-1013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Penpal Loneliness Project
NCT04797026 WITHDRAWN NA
Connect for Caregivers
NCT04919070 COMPLETED NA