Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
148 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-01-31
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Curative D2 vs D1 Lymphadenectomy in Operable Gastric Carcinoma
NCT04340440
Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic D1 Versus D2 Lymphadenectomy for Elderly Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03290209
A Multicenter Clinical Trial on Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery Compared With Open Surgery
NCT02302794
D1 vs D2 Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer
NCT05253430
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy With Splenic Hilum Lymph Nodes Dissection
NCT02980861
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
D1 Gastrectomy
Patients are managed by radical gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy
Radical gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy
D2 Gastrectomy
Patients are managed by radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radical gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy
Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Irresectable or metastatic disease
* Previous or coexisting cancer
* Prior gastric surgery.
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexandria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed El Messiry
Assistant professor of Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Elmessiry, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tamura S, Takeno A, Miki H. Lymph node dissection in curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:748745. doi: 10.1155/2011/748745. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, Bonenkamp JJ, Klein Kranenbarg E, Songun I, Welvaart K, van Krieken JH, Meijer S, Plukker JT, van Elk PJ, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, van Lanschot JJ, Taat CW, de Graaf PW, von Meyenfeldt MF, Tilanus H, Sasako M. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2069-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.026. Epub 2004 Apr 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
302764
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.