The Efficacy of Two Models of Intensive Upper Limb Training on Quality of Life in Children With Congenital Hemiplegia

NCT ID: NCT04425980

Last Updated: 2021-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-02-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compared the effectiveness of two-mode of activity-based upper limb rehabilitation (Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Bimanual training) on health-related quality of life outcomes in school-aged children with cerebral palsy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 52 primary schools were screened comprehensively to determine children conforming specifications of the inclusion criteria. Demographic characteristics (e.g. age, gender, affected side) and severity of functional impairment dealing with cognitive /communication, manual ability and mobility were noted. After a comprehensive screening, a total of 30 children met inclusion criteria (grades 1-4) were randomly assigned to one of two groups (Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy or Bimanual training), at an equal number and probability. Children blinded to group allocation were delivered activity-based upper limb training in the context of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy or Bimanual training, at a similar dose and frequency (10 weeks/3 days per week/2.5 hours per day). 1 out of 3 sessions per week was carried out in the school time (during the art or physical education class), while 2 out of 3 sessions were carried out in rehabilitation centers which the children regularly attend for regular care 2-day weekly. All participating children continued to receive their standard care (90 minutes per week) throughout the study period.

During the 1-month screening period, physical characteristics of participants were described through classification systems including The Communication Function Classification System, The Manual Ability Classification System , and The Gross Motor Function Classification System. Participating children were evaluated before the study entry (T1), immediately postintervention (T2), and at 16 weeks postintervention (T3) using the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemiplegia; Congenital

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

a total of 30 children met inclusion criteria (grades 1-4) were randomly assigned to one of two groups (modified constraint-induced movement therapy or Bimanual training), at an equal number and probability
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
by concealing the other allocated intervention from participants / unaware of the presence of a second intervention approach

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (test treatments)

A list of fine and motor activities consisted of the functional tasks or play activities such as school-education and sports activities, manipulative games, arts, and crafts, etc. to elicit the maximum capacity of the more affected upper limb was created according to the procedure of modified constraint-induced movement therapy (Gordon et al., 2005) and Bimanual training. In addition, specific activities were also chosen in terms of deficit of interest, participant preference (on the condition of having potential effects on hand skills) and parent/guardian, or their teacher's request. In case of activities requiring both hand use, such as stabilizing paper during the painting or holding the bricks of lego on the ground, the treating physiotherapist undertook a role as a dominant hand

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

intensive use of more affected arm in structured setting

Bimanual training

For the Bimanual training, skilled, repetitive, and structured bimanual activities (part or whole task practice) were used to promote bimanual hand use and improve movement deficits determined before the intervention. All targeted deficits of interest were addressed within the context of the selected activity. Specifically, symmetrical bilateral movements were utilized to augment neural input from both sides. Also, meaningful activities such as buttoning and zipping-up trousers, etc. were used to ensure a transition from structured setting to real-life activities

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

intensive use of more affected arm in structured setting

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

intensive use of more affected arm in structured setting

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of congenital hemiplegia,
* Must be able to grasp objects

Exclusion Criteria

* Cerebral palsy dependent severe emotional difficulties
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

11 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Muş Alparslan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hasan Bingöl

Academician (Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hasan Bingöl, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Muş Alparslan University

Mintaze Kerem Günel, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hacettepe University

Halil ALKAN, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Muş Alparslan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mus Alparslan University

Muş, Muş, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

no any sponsor

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.