Streamlining the Efficiency of PrEP Implementation

NCT ID: NCT04424524

Last Updated: 2024-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

746 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a pilot facility-based direct-to-pharmacy PrEP refill delivery to streamline care pathway in Kenyan public health HIV facilities implementing PrEP. Data on up to 500 PrEP users will be evaluated to understand delivery efficiency and in-depth interview with users and delivery key informants will be conducted to identify barriers and facilitators of implementation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective, pilot implementation evaluation of patient-centered differentiated care service. The core components of the multifaceted implementation strategy include: 1) 3-monthly refills, 2) direct-to-pharmacy refill visits, 3) HIV self-testing (HIVST) while waiting for refills, 4) Rapid risk assessment for ongoing risk, adherence, side effect, and acute HIV symptoms. Clinics will implement either: 1) current PrEP patient flow without any change or 2) a pilot differentiated pharmacy-based follow up PrEP care pathway. Clinics will implement only one delivery model thus eliminating risk for confusion in the clinic about delivery models and permitting a full-scale test of the system, since the efficiency in PrEP delivery is in part at the system level, above and beyond the individual client encounter. For this pilot project designed to primarily test delivery efficiency, feasibility and acceptability of direct-to-pharmacy care pathway at systems level using existing public health infrastructure, pilot and control clinics will be of comparable size selected to reflect the implementation nature of the design.

The specific aims are:

Aim 1: To evaluate whether a differentiated care model improves the efficiency of PrEP delivery while resulting in equivalent or better: 1) patient waiting time, 2) early PrEP continuation, and 3) adherence.

Aim 2: Conduct mixed-methods study to understand patient and provider perception, experiences , feasibility and acceptability of a differentiated PrEP delivery model.

Aim 3: Assess the efficiency, cost and cost-effectiveness of a facility-based differentiated PrEP care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Prevention HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Direct-to-pharmacy oral PrEP refill visits

Intervention

Group Type OTHER

Direct-to-pharmacy oral PrEP refill visits

Intervention Type OTHER

Programmatic direct-to-pharmacy oral PrEP refill visits supported with client HIV self-testing

Usual care

Control

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Direct-to-pharmacy oral PrEP refill visits

Programmatic direct-to-pharmacy oral PrEP refill visits supported with client HIV self-testing

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For HIV-negative participants:

* Of legal age (≥18 years)
* Able and willing to provide written informed consent for research component of the project (blood draw for adherence, brief surveys and in-depth qualitative interviews)
* HIV uninfected based on negative HIV tests, per Kenya national guidelines
* Currently or previously accessed PrEP at participating HIV clinic

For Key delivery informants:

* Able willing and able to provide consent in order to participate in the survey and qualitative interviews.
* Works at any of the clinics implementing PrEP delivery. Key informants may include HIV testing service nurses, counselors, clinicians, social workers, or clinic managers.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kenneth K Mugwanya

Assistant Professor, School of Medicine: Global Health

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth Mugwanya, MBChB, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Washington

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Partners in Health Research and Development

Thika, , Kenya

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Kenya

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zewdie KB, Ngure K, Mwangi M, Mwangi D, Maina S, Etyang L, Maina G, Ogello V, Owidi E, Mugo NR, Baeten JM, Mugwanya KK. Effect of differentiated direct-to-pharmacy PrEP refill visits supported with client HIV self-testing on clinic visit time and early PrEP continuation. J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Mar;27(3):e26222. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26222.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38446643 (View on PubMed)

Wairimu N, Ngure K, Ogello V, Owidi E, Mwangi P, Etyang L, Waituika W, Mwangi M, Githuku DM, Maina S, Irungu E, Mugo N, Mugwanya KK. Low HIV-risk aligned discontinuation among HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users within public HIV clinics in Kenya: A mixed method study. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;5(4):e0004493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004493. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40294082 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R00MH118134

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00007949

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rural PrEP Delivery
NCT03343223 COMPLETED NA
Clinical Decision Support for PrEP
NCT05245201 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
The Partners Scale-Up Project
NCT03052010 COMPLETED PHASE4