TDF Dose Adjustment VS. Switching to TAF in TDF-experienced CHB Patients With Renal Impairment
NCT ID: NCT04391608
Last Updated: 2022-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-09
2022-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Previous studies have shown the effects of TAF once daily and TDF once daily on kidney function and bone mass. The efficacy of TAF in virus suppression is comparable to TDF, but the effect on the kidneys and bone mass from TAF has less side effects than TDF. In addition, changing the medication from TDF to TAF shows that kidney function tends to improve.
Hepatitis B patients taking TDF have adjusted their dosage due to impair renal function, for example, from 1 time per day to every 48 hours or every 72 hours. This group of patients does not have a clear evidence-based recommendation for choosing a reduced dose of TDF or change to TAF. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to study patients with hepatitis B who have taken TDF and have renal function impairment that have been adjusted. Taking the same medicine with dose adjustment or changing the drug to TAF which treatment will more improve the kidney function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ALternative TEnofovir Dosing in Adults With Moderate Renal Function Impairment
NCT01671982
TAF for HIV-HBV With Renal Dysfunction
NCT03115736
Tenofovir Renal Toxicity and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Validation
NCT01138241
Assessing Virologic Success and Metabolic Changes in Patients Switching From a TDF to TAF Containing Antiretroviral Therapy Regimen
NCT03646370
Impact of Drug Therapy and Co-Morbidities on the Development of Renal Impairment in HIV-Infected Patients
NCT00551655
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who receiving natural immunity or receiving antiretroviral therapy that loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg loss) reduce the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HBsAg loss is now considered the target of treatment.
Nucleot(s)ide is an antiviral drug that can reduce the number of viruses, reduce the risk of HCC and death from Hepatitis B viral infection. The most widely used drugs are Lamivudine (LMV), Entecavir (ETV), Tenofovir disoproxil fumerate (TDF) and Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). However, Nucleotide is unable to eliminate the Hepatitis B virus from the liver cells of the infected person due to covalently closed. circular DNA (cccDNA), which is a template for viral replication. Therefore, long-term Nucleotide therapy is necessary. As a result, patients may have side effects from the treatment when taking medication for a long time, such as viral resistance in Lamivudine, deterioration of kidney function and osteoporosis in Tenofovir.
Tenofovir is a nucleotide analog drug that works against both Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV. TDF and TAF are prodrug of Tenofovir. TAF has a higher plasma stability than TDF, which makes TDF require a higher dose to get the concentration of drugs in the liver equal to the amount of TAF.
The side effects of Tenofovir treatment found on the kidneys and bones which are problems for long-term treatment. It is recommended to reduce the dose of TDF in patients with renal function reduced to less than 50 ml / min as shown in Table but do not have to adjust the dose of TAF except when the GFR value is less than 15 ml / min. it is recommended to stop taking TAF if severe renal impairment.
Previous studies have shown the effects of TAF once daily and TDF once daily on kidney function and bone mass. The efficacy of TAF in virus suppression is comparable to TDF, but the effect on the kidneys and bone mass from TAF has less side effects than TDF. In addition, changing the medication from TDF to TAF shows that kidney function tends to improve. Therefore, there is a recommendation in the practice guideline to change from TDF to TAF or ETV in patients who use TDF and there is a risk of kidney problems or thin bone mass based on history for LMV resistance (if LMV resistance, ETV should not be used because HBV is more resistant to ETV).
Hepatitis B patients taking TDF have adjusted their dosage due to impair renal function, for example, from 1 time per day to every 48 hours or every 72 hours. This group of patients does not have a clear evidence-based recommendation for choosing a reduced dose of TDF or change to TAF. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to study patients with hepatitis B who have taken TDF and have renal function impairment that have been adjusted. Taking the same medicine with dose adjustment or changing the drug to TAF which treatment will more improve the kidney function.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tenofovir Alafenamide
Tenofovir Alafenamide 25 mg/day
Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide
Switching from Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide
TDF dose reduction
TDF dose reduction
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide
Switching from Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection
3. Reduced renal function and need to adjust the dose of TDF
4. Have an eGFR of \> 15 ml / min.
5. HBV DNA viral load levels \< 10 U/mL in the last 3 months before participating in the project
6. No HCC by Ultrasonography of the upper abdomen or CT 3-phase of liver or MRI liver in the 3 months before participating in the project.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Decompensated cirrhosis, including variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy
3. Active hepatocellular carcinoma or during the 3 years after treatment
4. Solid organ transplantation or Bone marrow transplantation
5. Chronic kidney disease caused by glomerulonephritis, tubulo-interstitial nephritis), Obstructive uropathy or autosomal dominant polycystic kidney, and Kidney disease from other causes
6. Diabetes with HbA1c\> 8 or uncontrollable hypertension
7. Active malignancy of cancer in other organs in the last 3 years
8. History of receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or other nephrotoxic drugs within the past 1 month (except tenofovir) (For patients receiving NSAIDS after participating in this study, patients were advised to stop taking NSAIDs but not exclude from the study)
9. Receive immunosuppressive drug
10. Pregnancy
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Watcharasak Chotiyaputta
Associate professor, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Watcharasak Chotiyaputta, Asso Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mahidol University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Role: primary
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Si 798/2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.