Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
667 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-01
2022-06-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Repeated information and surveys of dental knowledge, dental habits and medical conditions etc. is sample.
Before birth, one month after birth, and 12 and 18 months after birth of the Child, the mother repeatedly answers questionnaires and recieves information about dental care.
At 18 months,and at the 3- and 6-year dental examinations the caries experience dmft/deft is registered.
All Children and accompanying parent receives an individual caries preventive program between the examinations.
Evaluation will be focused on possible caries sreduction and Health econimic aspects of the interventions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oral Health Promotion Vs. Standard Care in Egyptian Pregnant Women
NCT06868550
Oral Health and Pregnancy
NCT04992754
Oral Health Promotion: Youth as Agents Of Change
NCT03947203
Community-based Intergenerational Oral Health Study
NCT01120041
145/5000 Oral State and Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Pregnant Women on Their Oral Health and That of Their Unborn Child
NCT04269759
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. During pregnancy: Health talk with specially trained dental hygienist / dental nurse at the local Public Dental Clinic (Folktandvården Hageby). Determination of the family's risk assessment in accordance with the criteria of the regional Public Dental Service in the County of Östergötland is adapted for the project.
3. One-month monitoring in child health care: Follow-up of caries risk assessment of the family with the help of questionnaire 2 to future mother and father / partner.
4. Care program 6-18 months with different designed depending on caries risk.
5. At 12 months: Group information or individual call, depending on risk, in collaboration with child health care. Follow-up of the family's caries risk assessment with questionnaire 3 to the expectant mother and father / partner.
6. At 18 months regardless of risk: Health talk, examination and renewed caries risk assessment of the child according to the criteria of the Public Dental Service.
7. Dental care program 18-30 months, individually designed depending on caries risk evaluation: Oral health behavior is evaluated using a caries risk assessment questionnaire. The questions in the form are based on factors that are of importance for caries development, and are supplemented with information from the maternity care and social services medical records. The questionnaire is constructed with yes and no as a response alternative, where the no-answers, together with an assessment of a dietary registration, indicate an increased risk of developing caries. The questionnaire registers risk behavior as a point. The evaluation is conducted as an assessment of changed risk points. The baseline data uses the score from the first questionnaire to be answered during pregnancy, according to point 1 above in the dental care program. The questionnaire is constructed based on known risk factors for caries, but has not been validated for measuring oral health behavior. A validation is therefore planned to be implemented as part of the project and applied for separately. Caries prevalence is evaluated by routinely collected caries epidemiological data when the children are 3 and 6 years and reported as the proportion of caries-free children, average dmft (= caries, extracted and filled teeth) and proportion of children with deft\> =5. Three and six years are so-called indicator ages for caries epidemiological records. This means that caries data at the personal number level for all children in Östergötland are reported to the County Council. Participation in the dental care program is reported as the proportion of pregnant women who participate in the first health call compared to the proportion of pregnant women in control group 1 who participate in maternal health care's regular parental education on oral health at the midwifery. The usefulness of the questionnaire as a screening instrument is evaluated by comparing the outcome of the risk assessment with the caries outcome when the children in the control group are 3 and 6 years, respectively. The health economic evaluation focuses on cost efficiency. All costs associated with the intervention are recorded and calculated. Effects are calculated in the form of the number of people who come to the health interviews and meetings, changes in behavior, and in the longer term the changes in the number of dmft that occur. Cost efficiency is therefore calculated as the extra cost incurred per extra power (e.g. cost per person coming or cost per prevented dmft). The evaluation mainly uses a socio-economic perspective, which means that all costs and effects that arise at different levels in society are taken into account.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The study group of pregnant mothers (and their children) at the local Public Dental Clinic will be compared to a group of other pregnant mothers (and their children) and pregnant mothers (and their children) from the other dental clinics in the city and from another Public Dental Clinic with similar socioeconomic problems and similar caries prevalence as the clinic of the intervention group.
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motivational Interviewing Oral Health Education Group
The intervention group focused on the mothers from before birth until their child reached the age of 3 years. They received repeated questionnaires and repeated oral health education using the Motivational Interviewing (MI) technique.
Dental education - Motivational Interviewing
Motivational Interviewing - Focusing on oral/dental health
Local Control Group
The local control group included other mothers and their children, who were (randomized according to) born during the same time as the children in the intervention group. They received only a questionnaire before their children were born. Caries data from 3- and 6-year examination is used.
No interventions assigned to this group
Similar Socio-economics Control Group
This control group is from a Public Dental Clinic with similar socioeconomics (among the families in the catchment area of the clinic) as in the intervention group. This control group included mothers and their children, who were (randomized according to) born during the same time as the children in the intervention group. They received only a questionnaire before their children were born. Caries data from 3- and 6-year examination is used.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental education - Motivational Interviewing
Motivational Interviewing - Focusing on oral/dental health
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The expecting mother's accommodation - during the time of the study - is at an address within Hageby and Navestad (defined as associated socio-economic cluster status 5). (Socio-economic affiliation).
* The participating Child must be examined in the Public Dental Service at the 3- and 6-year examinations.
Exclusion Criteria
* Moved out of the area during the time of the study.
6 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Linkoeping University
OTHER_GOV
Mats Bågesund
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mats Bågesund
Associate Professor, PhD, Assistant Professor, Research Counselor, Senior Consultant Specialist in Pediatric Dentistry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mats Bågesund, Assoc Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Linköping University / Region Östergötland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mats Bågesund
Norrköping, Östergötland County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dnr 2012/259-31
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Dnr 2018/367-32
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EquHag 2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.