Chlorhexidine Vaginal Preparation for Reduction of Post-cesarean Endometritis and Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT04385680

Last Updated: 2022-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

840 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-15

Study Completion Date

2022-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to assess the beneficial value of vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.05% before cesarean delivery of cases in labor in reduction of postoperative endometritis, fever and wound complications compared to no preparation or using saline only.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of the vaginal cleansing in the previous study, yet this has not been adopted within obstetric practice internationally and does not feature within the NICE Intrapartum guideline.7 This is may be due to concerns with exposure of the fetus to iodine-based substances, concerns with vaginal staining and allergy to iodine. Iodine is an antibacterial agent, but becomes inactive by the presence of blood may limit its use.

Chlorhexidine show greater reduction in skin flora after application compared with povidone-iodine agents (0.5 and 4%) respectively and has a greater residual activity after application than other preparations and (unlike povidone iodine) it is not inactivated by the presence of blood. Thus, there are a number of reasons to believe that vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine would be an appropriate alternative to povidone iodine.8 There is one RCT comparing povidone iodine with chlorhexidine gluconate for vaginal cleansing at CS. This suggested that chlorhexidine may be superior, and further research was needed.9 Solutions that contain lower concentrations, such as chlorhexidine gluconate and acetate (0.05%) are usually well tolerated and may be used for vaginal preparation. With this preparation, there are no reported cases of allergy.8 Importantly, no safety concerns for the mother or baby have been identified with chlorhexidine gluconate used for vaginal cleansing.10

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postpartum Endometritis Wound Infection Chlorhexidine Adverse Reaction Postoperative Fever

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chlorhexidine vaginal prep.arm

Women in labor who will receive vaginal cleaning immediately before cesarean section using 50 ml of chlorhexidine gluconate 0.05% solution and standard abdominal scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate 4%. This concentration is indicated within the British National Formulary for swabbing in obstetrics. A swab soaked in the antiseptic will be used to clean the vagina for 30 seconds prior to CS at the time of urinary catheter insertion by long forceps.

After the CS procedure, the vagina is always cleaned of excess blood as with a dry swab.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chlorhexidine Gluconate vaginal solution 0.05%

Intervention Type DRUG

preoperative vaginal preparation

No vaginal antiseptic arm

Women in labor who will receive abdominal scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate 4% only. Vaginal preparation is not including antiseptic or using normal saline only.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chlorhexidine Gluconate vaginal solution 0.05%

preoperative vaginal preparation

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

No preparation or preparation with saline only

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Gestational age ≥28 weeks.
2. Cases had cesarean section after start of labor.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Women with known allergy to chlorhexidine gluconate or any of its ingredients.
2. Women with diagnosed group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization.
3. Women with active infection during the procedure.
4. Women did not receive the standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
5. Women with diagnosis of chorioamnionitis.
6. Prolonged rupture of membranes \>7 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hytham Atia

Associate Professor Obstetrics & Gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmed Shafiek

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Armed forces hospitals Southern Region KSA

Hytham Atia

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region

Khamis Mushait, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26849801 (View on PubMed)

Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017 Feb 17;9:81-88. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28255256 (View on PubMed)

Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K, Enders S. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 17;7(7):CD007892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.pub6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30016540 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

chlorhex. post cs endometritis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Skin Prep Study
NCT01472549 COMPLETED NA