Oral Colchicine in Argentina to Prevent Restenosis

NCT ID: NCT04382443

Last Updated: 2025-07-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

410 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-12

Study Completion Date

2022-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Oral treatment of Colchicine in Argentina (ORCA) trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial to included 450 patients with indication for myocardial revascularization with PCI between a group to be treated with BMS plus oral colchicine (OC) for three months, which should be administered at the time of PCI, these patients they would receive 0.5 mg twice a day per 3 months compared to the other group of patients who will be treated exclusively with last generation of DES.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In a previous randomized comparison oral colchicine plus bare metal stent (BMS) compared to BMS plus placebo in a diabetic High risk for re-stenosis population, OC demonstrate a significant reduction of angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after BMS implantation at one year of follow up (Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2013,61,1678-1685), with a clinical indication of target lesion revascularization in 3.6%. In addition previous reported registries from our group with Drug Eluting Stents showed similar amount of reduction in clinical parameters (not angiographic) of restenosis (ERACI III trial, one year TVR in 8.8% with 1st DES design, Rodriguez A et al EuroIntervention 2006,2:53-60 and 4.0% with 2nd generation DES design ERACI IV Cardiac and cardiovascular interventions Journal, 2014 ). Taking in account those numbers the investigators sought to compare differences in overall cost with both revascularization strategies at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years of follow up assuming that safety and efficacy clinical end points would be similar. Cost included in hospital, procedural and resources fees, follow up cost including re-hospitalization driving by target vessel revascularization (TVR) and both spontaneous and TVR myocardial infarction (MI) and medication cost for each revascularization strategies Safety end point will be incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of death from any cause, MI (peri-procedural and spontaneous at follow up) and ischemic driving TVR.

The study will be considered complete after all subjects have completed the 12-month Primary safety and efficacy endpoint was incidence of target vessel failure (TVF) plus one year overall cost with both strategies.. Additional end points are clinical endpoints measured in-hospital at at follow up period. cardiac death, cardiac death plus MI. spontaneous MI beyond 30 day to 5 years, and stent thrombosis rate (ST) (definite or probable by Academic Research Consortium definitions).

A sub-study of changes in biological markers of inflammation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) including MI will be analyzed in both groups. For this reason, a measurement of interleukin 6, metalloproteases, adiponectin and Protein C reactive (PCR) will be performed at the time of enrolment and 4 days and a month after inclusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Restenosis of Coronary Artery Stent Atherosclerosis Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oral Colchicine +BMS implantation

This group will receive after BMS and Colchicine, at the time of PCI, 0,5 mg twice a day during the first three months after stent implantation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Colchicine

Intervention Type DRUG

At the moment of BMS implantation intervention will mean that this group will receive colchicine as described.

Second generation Drug eluting stent (DES)

This group will receive DES at the moment of randomization and will be treated as standard of care.

All second generation DES should be approved by ANMAT for clinical use.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Colchicine

At the moment of BMS implantation intervention will mean that this group will receive colchicine as described.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BMS+Colchicine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical and angiographic

1. Subject must be at least 18 to 80 years of age.
2. Subject (or legal guardian) indicates understanding of the trial requirements and the treatment procedures and provides written informed consent before procedures are performed.
3. Subject is eligible for PCI
4. Subject has symptomatic coronary artery disease or silent ischemia with objective evidence of ischemia, or acute coronary syndromes, and qualifies for PCI

6\. Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \> 40 % as measured within 60 days prior to enrollment.

7\. Subject is willing to comply with all protocol-required follow-up evaluations.

8\. Subject has one or more coronary artery stenosis of ≥ 70 % in a coronary artery with visually estimated reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥2.50 mm.

Exclusion Criteria

Clinical and angiographic

1. Subject has a known allergy to contrast (that cannot be adequately pre-medicated) and/or the stent system or Colchicine. (e.g., cobalt chromium alloy, stainless steel, all P2Y12 inhibitors, or aspirin)
2. Planned surgery within 30 days after the index procedure
3. Other serious medical illness (e.g., cancer, congestive heart failure) with estimated life expectancy of less than 36 months.
4. Current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, cocaine, heroin, etc.)
5. Planned procedure that may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound data interpretation.
6. Subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions

5\. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device clinical trial that has not reached its primary endpoint, or that, in the opinion of the investigator, may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound data interpretation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alfredo E Rodriguez

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alfredo E Rodriguez, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sanatorio Otamendi

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Sanatorio Las Lomas

San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Correa-Sadouet C, Rodriguez-Granillo AM, Gallardo C, Mieres J, Fontana L, Curotto MV, Wainer P, Allende NG, Fernandez-Pereira C, M Vetulli H, la Hoz RP, Kastrati A, Rodriguez AE; ORCA investigators. Randomized comparison between bare-metal stent plus colchicine versus drug-eluting stent alone in prevention of clinical adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention. Future Cardiol. 2021 Jul;17(4):539-547. doi: 10.2217/fca-2020-0161. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33174761 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez-Granillo AM, Mieres J, Fernandez-Pereira C, Sadouet CC, Milei J, Swieszkowski SP, Stutzbach P, Santaera O, Wainer P, Rokos J, Gallardo C, Cristodulo-Cortez R, Perez de la Hoz R, Kastrati A, Rodriguez AE, On Behalf Of Orca Investigators. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bare-Metal Stents Plus Colchicine Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Preventing Adverse Cardiac Outcomes: Three-Year Follow-Up Results of the ORal Colchicine in Argentina (ORCA) Trial. J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):2871. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092871.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40363904 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CECI-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.