Gas Tamponade for Prevention of Postoperative Vitreous Hemorrhage in Diabetics

NCT ID: NCT04380077

Last Updated: 2023-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-15

Study Completion Date

2025-01-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypothesis: Patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for the indication of diabetic vitreous hemorrhage will have a lower incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhaging during the 6-month trial period when vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride gas is utilized compared to vitreous substitution with balanced salt solution.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects enrolled into the study are randomized into one of the ensuing treatment cohorts: Group A patients undergo vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas during PPV, whereas Group B patients undergo vitreous substitution with balanced salt solution (BSS) during PPV. Simple randomization allocates patients into treatment groups during PPV. Once all relevant maneuvers are completed by the surgeon prior to vitreous substitution, a simulated coin toss program decides the vitreous substitute, and therefore which group the patient enters. Randomization intraoperatively mitigates against selection bias of utilized surgical maneuvers such as endodiathermy on the part of the surgeon and allows for subjects to not undergo randomization in cases where intraoperative retinal breaks occur that would preclude the subject from receiving vitreous substitution with BSS.

Subjects undergo data collection at 3 postoperative visits: 1) 15 +/- 5 days following PPV, 2) 40 +/- 10 days following PPV, and 3) 185 +/- 15 days following PPV. Study subjects are evaluated at non-study times at the judgment of the examiner.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
The operating surgeons did not participate in the preoperative or postoperative care of the patient, including the data collection.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sulfur hexafluoride gas

vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride gas during vitrectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

vitrectomy with sulfur hexafluoride gas

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride gas during vitrectomy

balanced salt solution

vitreous substitution with balanced salt solution during vitrectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

vitrectomy with balanced salt solution

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

vitreous substitution with balances salt solution during vitrectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

vitrectomy with sulfur hexafluoride gas

vitreous substitution with 20-30% sulfur hexafluoride gas during vitrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

vitrectomy with balanced salt solution

vitreous substitution with balances salt solution during vitrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patient has medically-managed type I or II diabetes mellitus.
2. The age of the patient is \> 18 years old,
3. Snellen best-corrected visual acuity is from 20/40 to hand motions at one foot in the subject's study eye
4. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy with a clinically evident vitreous hemorrhage of duration of at least one month by subjective history is present in the subject's study eye.
5. The vitreous hemorrhage is symptomatic and primarily responsible for the patient's reduced vision in the judgement of the examiner.
6. Grade 0 or I vitreoretinal adhesion according to the classification system described by Ahn et al \[@\] in the study eye is clinically present.

* Ahn J, Woo SJ, Chung H, et al. The effect of adjunctive intravitreal bevacizumab for preventing postvitrectomy hemorrhage in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 2218-2226.

Exclusion:

1. The subject's study eye previously underwent anterior or posterior vitrectomy.
2. A lens or cornea opacity is thought to be responsible for two or more lines of reduced visual acuity in the subject's study eye (cataract, corneal scar, ectasia, etc.).
3. Optic nerve or retina disease otherwise not related to diabetes mellitus is thought to be responsible for two or more lines of reduced visual acuity in the subject's study eye (optic neuritis, macular degeneration, glaucoma, epiretinal membrane, etc.).
4. A non-ocular cause (i.e. cerebrovascular accident) or amblyopia is thought to be responsible for two or more lines of reduced visual acuity in the subject's study eye
5. Neovascular glaucoma with a high intraocular pressure ( \> 30 mm Hg) is discovered in the subject's study eye.
6. Medically uncontrolled systemic hypertension (systolic \> 200 mmHg or diastolic \> 120 mmHg) is present.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rush Eye Associates

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sloan W. Rush, MD

Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ryan Rush, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

panhandle eye group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

La Carlota Hospital

Montemorelos, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB0009239-Retina 5

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anti-VEGF vs. Prompt Vitrectomy for VH From PDR
NCT02858076 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
REtinal Detachment Outcomes Study
NCT05863312 RECRUITING NA