RCT on LIFT Versus Modified Parks Technique Versus Two-Stage Seton

NCT ID: NCT04377542

Last Updated: 2020-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

LIFT is a sphincter-saving procedure that is based on the concept of secure closure of the internal opening and concomitant removal of infected cryptoglandular tissue in the intersphincteric plane. Modified Parks technique involves adequate drainage of the intersphincteric space by extending the internal anal sphincterotomy. Placement of seton in the fistula track has been used for a long time and is still being currently used. Drainage two-stage seton is used to promote adequate drainage of infection and can be employed as a definitive treatment of anal fistula.

This present randomized study aimed to compare LIFT, modified Parks technique, and two-stage seton in treatment of complex anal fistula in terms of success of treatment and complication rates.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anal Fistula

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LIFT

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LIFT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ligation of the fistula tract in the intersphincteric plane

Parks

Modified Parks technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Parks

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Modified Parks fistulotomy with complete internal anal sphincterotomy

Seton

Two-stage seton placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Seton

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Excision of the superficial part of fistula tract and tying loose seton around the remaining part and anal sphincter muscles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LIFT

Ligation of the fistula tract in the intersphincteric plane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Parks

Modified Parks fistulotomy with complete internal anal sphincterotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Seton

Excision of the superficial part of fistula tract and tying loose seton around the remaining part and anal sphincter muscles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult Patients of either sex aged less than 65 years presenting with complex anal fistula were included. Complex anal fistulas were defined as high trans-sphincteric (involving more than 30% of the external anal sphincter), extra-sphincteric, supra-sphincteric, horse-shoe fistulas and anterior fistulas in females

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with simple anal fistula (intersphincteric and low trans-sphincteric anal fistula)
* Patients with associated anorectal pathology such as anal fissure, hemorrhoids, rectal prolapse, neoplasm, solitary rectal ulcer, inflammatory bowel diseases.
* Patients on long-acting steroids or immunosuppressive drugs.
* Patients with fecal incontinence (FI)
* Patients with previous anorectal operations including surgery for previous anal fistula.
* Patients with ASA score (American society of anesthesiologists) of III and higher
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sameh H Emile, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mansoura University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mansoura university hospital

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Mansoura152020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Platelet- Rich Plasma Injection
NCT06887166 COMPLETED NA