Opioid Free Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04355468

Last Updated: 2022-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Proper assessment of pain and adequate analgesia in thoracic surgery is a challenging issue for medical practitioners. Basic aspects of thoracic anaesthesia are general anesthesia, intubation with double lumen tube and separation of lung ventilation, however proper analgesia needs to be standardized. Role of opioids in this clinical setting is reduced due to high risk of respiratory system complications. Instead, use of opioid free anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia is proposed. The aim of this study is to compare the use of opioid anaesthesia with opioid free anaesthesia and paravertebral block.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Surgery Analgesics, Opioid Anesthesia, Conduction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

General anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.1 mg∙kg-1, propofol 2 mg∙kg-1, and cisatracurium 0.15 mg∙kg-1. The patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen tube in adequate size and positioned laterally. Anesthesia was maintained with 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane. The patients awoke from anesthesia in a post-anesthesia care unit, and were extubated after the administration of adequate doses of atropine and neostigmine as required. After surgery, if a patient complained of pain then she/he was given i.v. oxycodone by an anesthetist before commencing the patient controlled analgesia (PCA). This dose was titrated to achieve adequate analgesia. Each patient then commenced PCA. The PCA solution was oxycodone (1mgml-1) and the PCA was programmed to allow a self-administered bolus dose of 1mg oxycodone with a lockout time of 5 min. Additionally, patients were given 1 g intravenous paracetamol every 6 h and 100mg of intravenous ketoprofen every 12 h.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Opioid Anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraoperatively, fentanyl in fractional doses of 1-3 µg∙kg-1 were applied if the heart rate (HR; Heart Rate) or mean blood pressure (MBP; Mean Blood Pressure) increased by more than 20% above the baseline value obtained just before surgery commencement.

Opioid Free Aneasthesia group

General anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.1 mg∙kg-1, propofol 2 mg∙kg-1, and cisatracurium 0.15 mg∙kg-1. The patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen tube in adequate size and positioned laterally. Anesthesia was maintained with 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane. The patients awoke from anesthesia in a post-anesthesia care unit, and were extubated after the administration of adequate doses of atropine and neostigmine as required. After surgery, if a patient complained of pain then she/he was given i.v. oxycodone by an anesthetist before commencing the patient controlled analgesia (PCA). This dose was titrated to achieve adequate analgesia. Each patient then commenced PCA. The PCA solution was oxycodone (1mgml-1) and the PCA was programmed to allow a self-administered bolus dose of 1mg oxycodone with a lockout time of 5 min. Additionally, patients were given 1 g intravenous paracetamol every 6 h and 100mg of intravenous ketoprofen every 12 h.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Opioid Free Anaesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Before the induction of general anesthesia, a single-shot thoracic paravertebral block (ThPVB) was performed at the Th3-Th4 level. An insulated needle was used, connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator. 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 ml∙kg-1) was then injected after a negative aspiration test. The efficacy of the blockade was checked after 20 min on both sides of the thorax with a plastic ampoule of saline. A difference in the sensation of cold between the sides of the thorax was assumed to indicate an effective block. Afterwards a continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine was started:

1. immediately after anesthesia induction, lidocaine was administered as an i.v. bolus at a dose of 1.5 mg∙kg-1 and ketamine in an i.v. bolus of 0.35 mg∙kg-1;
2. followed by an infusion of lidocaine 2.0 mg∙kg-1∙h-1 for 2 hours, continued at a dose of 1.2 mg∙kg-1∙h-1, and ketamine infusion 0.2 mg∙kg-1∙h-1 for 2 hours, continued at a dose of 0.12 mg∙kg-1∙h-1.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Opioid Anesthesia

Intraoperatively, fentanyl in fractional doses of 1-3 µg∙kg-1 were applied if the heart rate (HR; Heart Rate) or mean blood pressure (MBP; Mean Blood Pressure) increased by more than 20% above the baseline value obtained just before surgery commencement.

Intervention Type DRUG

Opioid Free Anaesthesia

Before the induction of general anesthesia, a single-shot thoracic paravertebral block (ThPVB) was performed at the Th3-Th4 level. An insulated needle was used, connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator. 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 ml∙kg-1) was then injected after a negative aspiration test. The efficacy of the blockade was checked after 20 min on both sides of the thorax with a plastic ampoule of saline. A difference in the sensation of cold between the sides of the thorax was assumed to indicate an effective block. Afterwards a continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine was started:

1. immediately after anesthesia induction, lidocaine was administered as an i.v. bolus at a dose of 1.5 mg∙kg-1 and ketamine in an i.v. bolus of 0.35 mg∙kg-1;
2. followed by an infusion of lidocaine 2.0 mg∙kg-1∙h-1 for 2 hours, continued at a dose of 1.2 mg∙kg-1∙h-1, and ketamine infusion 0.2 mg∙kg-1∙h-1 for 2 hours, continued at a dose of 0.12 mg∙kg-1∙h-1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* body mass index between 19-30 kg/m2,
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status between 1 and 3

Exclusion Criteria

* lack of consent
* significant coagulopathy,
* contraindication to drugs used in protocol
* history of chronic pain,
* chest wall neoplastic invasion,
* previous thoracic spine surgery,
* mental state preventing from effective use of PCA device,
* renal failure (GFR \<60 ml/min/1,73 m2)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Silesia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Piotr Palaczyński

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1

Zabrze, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OPA-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.