CoVid-19 - Infection and Antibody Formation in the Viennese Population
NCT ID: NCT04346264
Last Updated: 2022-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
12419 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-04-27
2020-05-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study population:
A representative sample of the Viennese population stratified by age and gender (data from the Vienna Health Study LEAD)
Potential output and analysis:
* Extent of age-specific infection and antibody formation
* Cumulative incidence of infection
* Rate of asymptomatic infection
* Relationship with socioeconomics, lifestyle and risk factors (comorbidities)
Study design:
Prospective, longitudinal, stratified by age and gender
Duration of study:
Initial testing as soon as possible and repeat based on monitoring of the pandemic curve (probably after 2-3 months)
Information to be obtained from participants:
* serum samples for information on SARS-CoV2 infection and antibody formation
* data on clinical symptoms
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A COVID-19 Symptom, Exposure and Immune Response Registry
NCT04348942
Study to Determine the Immunization Status Among Nephrological Health Care Personnel Against SARS-CoV-2 in a Single Center Over the Course of 12 Months During the Worldwide COVID-19 Pandemic.
NCT04347694
Evaluation of Inflammatory Cytokines During COVID-19
NCT04824495
Precision Immunology to Determine the Immune Response in Patients With COVID-19
NCT04360733
COVID Cohort Study
NCT04393155
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently the direct detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus from the mouth/nose/throat swab using PCR is established worldwide with high sensitivity and specificity. This direct method is expensive and not always available in sufficient quantities. Furthermore, the results are strongly influenced by the quality of the smear collection.
The detection of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus is an alternative method for determining whether a person has been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and has developed an immune response to the virus. Recently several companies have been offering such kits for sale. According to national experts, these kits have not yet been sufficiently clinically validated, which is why valid data on their sensitivity and specificity are not yet available. However, on the validation of these tests are being worked hard all over the world, so that it can be assumed (the experts also agree on this) that data on the sensitivity and specificity of the antibody tests will be available in the foreseeable future.
Probably the only reasonable and feasible method of testing the actual rate of Covid-19 infection in a given population is to detect infection (either directly or indirectly by means of antibody testing) from a sample that is as representative as possible for this population.
The selected subjects of the LEAD study, the core project of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health at Otto Wagner Hospital (the hospital association is an official partner of the institute), represent an exemplary representative sample of the general population in Vienna (i.e. the sample corresponds to the Viennese population in terms of age, gender, smoking habits, place of residence, etc.). In the LEAD study, more than 11,000 subjects (aged 6-80) mainly from Vienna were subjected to a "Health examination survey" (2).
Due to the conditions described above, blood should be drawn from the subjects of the LEAD study at two points in time (as early as possible and after two to three months) and blood sera should be frozen to determine antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and tested with a test of high sensitivity and specificity. According to the WHO this procedure (longitudinal cohort study with serial sampling of the same individuals (in the same geographic area) each time) is recommended in that provides the most comprehensive information on extent of infection.
By testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies twice in the subjects of the LEAD study (random sample), an accurate and representative estimate of the actual positive Covid-19 cases in the Viennese population and the rate of spread during the pandemic could be extrapolated for Vienna in the foreseeable future. Since more than 1,500 individual parameters were measured in the participants of the LEAD study, conclusions on socioeconomics, lifestyle factors and possible risk profiles (e.g. co-morbidity, smoking behaviour, etc.) can be drawn from those who tested positive (but also negative). In addition, a query regarding symptoms should be carried out at both dates in order to obtain information on the percentage of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
General Cohort
Population general cohort from the Austrian LEAD Study
NO intervention planned due to the observational study design only a diagnostic testing
Only a diagnostic test (serum blood and antibody measurement) is planned
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NO intervention planned due to the observational study design only a diagnostic testing
Only a diagnostic test (serum blood and antibody measurement) is planned
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
6 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Otto C Burghuber, Prof.MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The LEAD Study Center
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Breyer-Kohansal R, Faner R, Breyer MK, Ofenheimer A, Schrott A, Studnicka M, Wouters EFM, Burghuber OC, Hartl S, Agusti A. Factors Associated with Low Lung Function in Different Age Bins in the General Population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 15;202(2):292-296. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202001-0172LE. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Homepage of the Austrian LEAD Study
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LEAD CoVid-19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.