Effect of Cequa Treatment on Accuracy of Pre-operative Biometry & Higher Order Aberrations in Dry Eye Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04342988

Last Updated: 2021-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-08

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Cequa treatment on the accuracy of pre-operative biometry and on corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in cataract patients who have signs of dry eye disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis: In patients with dry eye, defined as corneal staining and a reduced tear breakup time, the accuracy of pre-operative biometry and corneal surface HOAs will improve significantly after four weeks of Cequa treatment.

Primary Outcome Measure: Spherical equivalent prediction error of pre-Cequa vs post-Cequa ocular biometry performed for cataract surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures:

The impact of Cequa treatment on corneal higher order aberrations measured in the central 6 mm of the cornea.

The difference in SPEED questionnaire scores before and 4 weeks after Cequa treatment.

The difference in corneal staining and tear breakup time (TBUT) before and after treatment with Cequa.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndromes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cequa Treatment In Cataract Patients with Dry Eye Disease

Duration of Study Treatment - 4 weeks All patients will receive cyclosporine ophthalmic solution (0.09%) BID in both eyes for 28 days, 1 drop per dose. Dosing will be BID, both eyes, assuming both eyes will eventually undergo cataract surgery. Otherwise, single eye treatment in the operative eye will be permitted.

Group Type OTHER

Cequa

Intervention Type DRUG

The effect of Cequa treatment on the accuracy of pre-operative biometry and on corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in cataract patients who have signs of dry eye disease.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cequa

The effect of Cequa treatment on the accuracy of pre-operative biometry and on corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in cataract patients who have signs of dry eye disease.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with planned cataract surgery,
* The presence of central or inferior corneal fluorescein staining defined by the Oxford Scale
* Reduced tear break up time (TBUT) ≤ 10 seconds.
* Able to comprehend and sign a statement of informed consent.
* Willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits.

Exclusion Criteria

* Ocular surgery (e.g., intraocular, oculoplastic, corneal or refractive surgical procedure) performed within the last 3 months or at any time that in the investigator's clinical judgment if it would interfere with the outcome measures of this study.
* Clinically significant ocular trauma.
* Active ocular Herpes simplex or Herpes Zoster infection
* Ocular inflammation (uveitis, iritis, scleritis, episcleritis, keratitis, conjunctivitis) at the discretion of the investigator.
* Ocular infection (e.g., viral, bacterial, mycobacterial, protozoan or fungal infection or the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, lacrimal sac or eyelids including hordeolum/stye).
* Active, systemic or local disease condition that causes clinically significant ocular surface irritation such that it could interfere with the study findings.
* Moderate to severe (Grade 2-4) allergic, vernal or giant papillary conjunctivitis.
* Severe (Grade 3 or 4) inflammation of the eyelid (e.g., blepharochalasis, staphylococcal blepharitis or seborrheic blepharitis)
* Eyelid abnormalities that significantly affect the lid function (e.g., entropion, ectropion, tumor, edema, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, severe ptosis).
* Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise the corneal integrity (e.g., prior chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, Grade 3 corneal fluorescein staining, map dot fingerprint dystrophy, or the effect of any other ophthalmic medication that might in the opinion of the investigator compromise the ocular surface integrity).
* Participation in this trial in the same patient's fellow eye
* Patients who are under age 18, pregnant or breastfeeding, or who may become pregnant during participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Research Insight LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Hovanesian, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Research Insight LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Harvard Eye Associates

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Ophthalmology Associates

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Ophthalmic Surgeons & Consultants of Ohio

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Behrens A, Doyle JJ, Stern L, Chuck RS, McDonnell PJ, Azar DT, Dua HS, Hom M, Karpecki PM, Laibson PR, Lemp MA, Meisler DM, Del Castillo JM, O'Brien TP, Pflugfelder SC, Rolando M, Schein OD, Seitz B, Tseng SC, van Setten G, Wilson SE, Yiu SC; Dysfunctional tear syndrome study group. Dysfunctional tear syndrome: a Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea. 2006 Sep;25(8):900-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000214802.40313.fa.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17102664 (View on PubMed)

Geerling G, Tauber J, Baudouin C, Goto E, Matsumoto Y, O'Brien T, Rolando M, Tsubota K, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):2050-64. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997g. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21450919 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Sun Cequa Accuracy 191118

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Safety and Tolerability of EO2002
NCT05587205 RECRUITING PHASE1