Efficiency and Satisfaction With Telephone Consultation in Neuro-urology: Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic
NCT ID: NCT04341714
Last Updated: 2021-06-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
450 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-03-16
2020-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The COVID-19 pandemic might be an opportunity to review and refine our practices in neuro-urology. For the follow-up of selected patients, telephone consultations may be efficient and cost effective.
The aim of the study is to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction with telephone consultation for the physician and the patient.
The study was conducted in a neuro-urology department of a university hospital in France.
During the stay-home policies for the COVID-19 pandemic, all the scheduled medical visits were converted into telephone consultation. New patients weren't included.
For each teleconsultation, the physician assess the duration of the consultation, the number of tries to join the patient, the efficiency of the consultation, the difficulty to obtain relevant information due to the phone way of the consultation and the lack of physical examination.
On the next days, the patient was contacted by phone and was asked a) if he was satisfied of being phoned by the physician, b) if the teleconsultation was embarrassing, c) if he had enough time of teleconsultation d) if he got all the answers to his queries, e) if he would preferred to had a physical consultation f) to assessed the global satisfaction of the teleconsultation and g) if in the future, they may considered converting some clinic visits to teleconsultations.
The physician and the patient assessed whether this teleconsultation has replaced a physical visit.
The usual transport mode of the patient for a clinic visit and the need to take a day off for worker patients were recorded.
The primary aim was to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction of the telephone consultation. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on a numerical 10-points scale. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the satisfaction of the telephone consultation by the patient on a numerical 10-points scale.
Four hundred teleconsultations are scheduled for five physicians.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study on Telemedicine Applied to Actual Outpatient Clinic for Epilepsy
NCT05418257
Comparative Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Primary Care
NCT04684836
Medical Telemonitoring Plus Individual Teleconsultation in Elderly
NCT02196428
Surgical Telemedicine in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era
NCT04376710
Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine
NCT04274764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients enrolled
Patients with telephone consultation on neurourology department, age \> 18
Satisfaction evaluation
Assessement of satisfaction of the telephone consultation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Satisfaction evaluation
Assessement of satisfaction of the telephone consultation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Telephone consultation
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pierre and Marie Curie University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gérard Amarenco
PHD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gérard Amarenco, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sorbonne Université, GRC 001, GREEN Groupe de Recherche en Neuro-Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, F-75020, Paris, France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Neuro- Urology, Hôpital Tenon
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GREEN GRC01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.