Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management

NCT ID: NCT02724930

Last Updated: 2022-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

135 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-25

Study Completion Date

2020-08-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will test the effectiveness of using enhanced facilitation strategies on implementation of an automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system as a means to remotely deliver in-home self-management support to Veterans with chronic pain. The implementation intervention uses an enhanced facilitation approach paired with automated case finding and direct patient outreach to encourage uptake of Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management (COPES). A nested effectiveness study will measure pre-post differences in pain-relevant outcomes (pain intensity, physical functioning and physical activity). The investigators will use a stepped wedge cluster design in which clusters will be randomized to the timing of the introduction of enhanced COPES implementation. Investigators will assess the efficacy of the facilitation based implementation strategy by evaluating COPES uptake in the implementation settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain is a commonly used evidence-based self-management intervention. Though effective, CBT requires that patients attend multiple in-person visits and that highly trained staff be available to provide care. For these reasons CBT is resource intensive, often inaccessible to Veterans, and delivered unevenly across patients and facilities. In a Veterans Health Administration Office of Health Services Research and Development (HSR\&D) IIR-funded trial, investigators found that CBT delivered primarily via an automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system (Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management or COPES) leads to patient-centered outcomes that are comparable to standard United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) approaches in which CBT is delivered in-person by a therapist over ten weekly sessions. In this study, implementation facilitation will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) which provides a set of constructs to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation. The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of the facilitation approach paired with automated case finding and direct patient outreach on uptake of COPES in the clinical care setting. Study investigators will specifically target Veterans who receive care at community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs) because these sites typically have few or no therapists trained in CBT for chronic pain.

Description of COPES: COPES is a 10-week, IVR-facilitated program of CBT for chronic pain. The primary components of COPES include: 1) a self-help handbook to teach Veterans pain self-management skills and describe the weekly skill practice goals, 2) a pedometer-facilitated progressive walking program (all COPES patients will be given an Omron Go Smart, Model HJ-112 pocket pedometer at the time of enrollment), and 3) daily, automated IVR calls to collect patient-reported pain intensity and pain-related interference, sleep quality, pedometer-measured step count, and adherence to the pain coping skill practice ratings. Participants will also receive a weekly, two to four minute pre-recorded, personalized therapist message via the IVR system based on the participant's IVR-recorded data. Therapists provide feedback on the participant's weekly average pain intensity, sleep, steps, and pain coping skill practice, note any changes from the prior week, and comment on symptom or activity patterns. Therapists also provide reinforcement for goal accomplishment, help patients make connections among pain, pain coping skill practice, and goal accomplishment, and assign a steps and skill practice goal for the upcoming week.

Research Design: Study investigators will test the effectiveness of the facilitation approach to implement COPES as a means to remotely deliver in-home self-management support to Veterans with chronic pain. To evaluate the implementation's success, study investigators will conduct a multi-site, stepped wedge, Hybrid III trial in 17 CBOCs affiliated with three geographically dispersed sites (VA Boston, VA Palo Alto, and Roudebush VA in Indianapolis). Clusters (k=17 CBOCs) will be randomized to 6 different time periods proportional to approximate eligible patient population size. Each CBOC will serve as its own control for a period of time before "transitioning" into enhanced facilitation; the time of this transition is randomized in a stepped fashion. The primary outcome for evaluating implementation success will be patient enrollment in COPES. The secondary outcome will be provider referral. Other outcomes that will be investigated as part of the nested COPES effectiveness study will be Veterans' physical functioning, pain intensity, and physical activity.

Methodology: Study investigators will evaluate the success of the implementation strategy by evaluating the proportion of patients who are offered enrollment in COPES who actually enroll. Additionally, study investigators will conduct a formative evaluation to inform, refine and evaluate implementation of COPES. The evaluation will include interviews with VA staff and patients with chronic back pain at the proposed implementation sites. Interview guides will be based on CFIR model constructs using questions adapted from the CFIR interview guide. Investigators will also measure pre-post differences in pain-relevant outcomes (pain intensity, physical functioning and physical activity).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Implementation

Standard COPES implementation consists of provider education including brief in-person presentations and written material.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Implementation Facilitation

Enhanced facilitation of COPES implementation.

All clusters start in the standard implementation group and cross-over from the control group to the intervention group in a randomized stepped-wedge fashion at 7 time points over the course of the 33 week implementation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enhanced facilitation of COPES

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Enhanced facilitation of COPES implementation consists of promotional meetings, automated case finding and proactive outreach to recruit patients, marketing and educational materials, local champion, and academic detailing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enhanced facilitation of COPES

Enhanced facilitation of COPES implementation consists of promotional meetings, automated case finding and proactive outreach to recruit patients, marketing and educational materials, local champion, and academic detailing.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Veterans COPES:

1. Back-pain-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnosis
2. Pain intensity rating of ≥4 (indicating moderate pain) on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale on at least two separate outpatient encounters at a CBOC in the prior year
3. CBOC patient at VA Boston, VA Palo Alto or Roudebush VA

Veterans Interviews:

1. Those who are eligible for COPES, but who have not been asked to enroll (pre-implementation period)
2. Those who participate in COPES (post-implementation)
3. Those who decline enrollment in COPES (post-implementation)
4. CBOC patients at VA Boston, VA Palo Alto or Roudebush VA

Admin, Champion, Provider Interviews:

1\. Employed at the project implementation sites

Exclusion Criteria

Veterans (COPES \& Interviews):

1. Diagnosis of cancer, dementia, schizophrenia, and active alcohol or substance abuse
2. Psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days
3. Patients who are designated as fall risks and/or have active diabetic foot ulcers

Admin, Champion, Provider Interviews:

1\. Not employed at the project implementation sites
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Connecticut Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alicia A Heapy, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Connecticut Healthcare System

John D Piette, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Palo Alto Healthcare System

Menlo Park, California, United States

Site Status

Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

VA Boston Healthcare System

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

M2VA Pain Care Pathway
NCT06526143 RECRUITING NA