Intermittent Pneumatic Compression of the Upper Extremity for Post-Operative VTE Prophylaxis
NCT ID: NCT04341272
Last Updated: 2020-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
106 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-01
2017-04-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study was to determine whether upper extremity (UE) CD are as effective as lower extremity (LE) CD in preventing VTE following surgery. A total of 106 patients were recruited.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compression Treatment Effects on Complications and Healing of Achilles Tendon Rupture
NCT01317160
Open Label Clinical Study to Assess the Clinical Safety of a New Compression Device in Subjects With Peripheral Arterial Vascular Disease
NCT00854516
External Compression Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Lower-Limb Loss and Cardiovascular Mortality
NCT02054416
Swedish Multicenter Trial of Outpatient Prevention of Leg Clots
NCT03259204
Feasibility of Outpatient Care After Manual Compression in Patients Treated for Peripheral Arterial Disease by Endovascular Technique With 5F Sheath Femoral Approach
NCT03185052
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of compression devices on arms and legs is within standard of care, but use on legs tends to be more common.
Research studies have shown that use of compression devices in combination with heparin is more effective in preventing blood clots than either one alone.
Not many clinicians remember the option of placing compression devices on arms, and patients who do not get compression devices placed on their legs following surgery, often get only medication (heparin) with no compression device placed at all.
This study will compare the effectiveness of compression devices used on patients' arms with those used on patients' legs, at preventing blood clots. Non-invasive ultrasound studies will be used after surgery to check for blood clots in the legs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Upper Extremity Compression Device
Patients randomized to have pneumatic compression device placed on upper extremity following surgery
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device (FDA approved)
Compression Device placed on either upper or lower extremity for DVT prophylaxis following surgery
Control
Patients randomized to have pneumatic compression device placed on lower extremity following surgery
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device (FDA approved)
Compression Device placed on either upper or lower extremity for DVT prophylaxis following surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device (FDA approved)
Compression Device placed on either upper or lower extremity for DVT prophylaxis following surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Known history of venous thromboembolism (VTE)
* Known history of hematological disorders
* Diagnosed malignancy requiring or undergoing treatment
* Presence of upper extremity arterio-venous access for hemodialysis
* Females were excluded to eliminate the confounding thrombogenic effect of estrogen.
18 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baltimore VA Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Preeti R. John, MD, MPH, FACS
Clinical Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Preeti R John, MD, MPH, FACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baltimore VA Medical Center
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Priliminary data published in Journal of American College of Surgeons abstract
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HP-00051138
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.