Intermittent Pneumatic Compression of the Upper Extremity for Post-Operative VTE Prophylaxis

NCT ID: NCT04341272

Last Updated: 2020-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-01

Study Completion Date

2017-04-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality following surgery.A combination of chemical and mechanical prophylaxis using lower extremity compression devices (CD) is recommended in patients who are considered at 'moderate risk' (Caprini score 2 - 4) or 'high risk' (Caprini score \> 4) of developing VTE.

The aim of this study was to determine whether upper extremity (UE) CD are as effective as lower extremity (LE) CD in preventing VTE following surgery. A total of 106 patients were recruited.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hospitals throughout the United States currently utilize mechanical compression devices on patients' limbs for prevention of blood clots, in addition to blood thinning medication - heparin. The compression devices act by affect blood clotting mechanism and there is evidence from previous research studies that blood is less likely to develop clots when these compression devices are placed on the arms or legs.

The use of compression devices on arms and legs is within standard of care, but use on legs tends to be more common.

Research studies have shown that use of compression devices in combination with heparin is more effective in preventing blood clots than either one alone.

Not many clinicians remember the option of placing compression devices on arms, and patients who do not get compression devices placed on their legs following surgery, often get only medication (heparin) with no compression device placed at all.

This study will compare the effectiveness of compression devices used on patients' arms with those used on patients' legs, at preventing blood clots. Non-invasive ultrasound studies will be used after surgery to check for blood clots in the legs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Thromboses

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Upper Extremity Compression Device

Patients randomized to have pneumatic compression device placed on upper extremity following surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device (FDA approved)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Compression Device placed on either upper or lower extremity for DVT prophylaxis following surgery

Control

Patients randomized to have pneumatic compression device placed on lower extremity following surgery

Group Type OTHER

Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device (FDA approved)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Compression Device placed on either upper or lower extremity for DVT prophylaxis following surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device (FDA approved)

Compression Device placed on either upper or lower extremity for DVT prophylaxis following surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Males aged \> 18 years who could provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients on coumadin or post-operative therapeutic heparin
* Known history of venous thromboembolism (VTE)
* Known history of hematological disorders
* Diagnosed malignancy requiring or undergoing treatment
* Presence of upper extremity arterio-venous access for hemodialysis
* Females were excluded to eliminate the confounding thrombogenic effect of estrogen.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baltimore VA Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Preeti R. John, MD, MPH, FACS

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Preeti R John, MD, MPH, FACS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Baltimore VA Medical Center

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.journalacs.org/article/S1072-7515(16)31034-1/abstract

Priliminary data published in Journal of American College of Surgeons abstract

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HP-00051138

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

FS VH S/D 500 S-apr in Vascular Surgery
NCT00892957 COMPLETED PHASE3