Balloon Angioplasty vs. Cutting Balloon Angioplasty of Femoropopliteal Arteries- a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT00437905
Last Updated: 2007-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-06-30
2007-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PTA vs. CB-PTA for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis
NCT00481780
Percutaneous Intervention Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Common Femoral Artery Lesions
NCT02517827
Registry of Cutting Balloon and DCB Intervention in Femoropopliteal Stenosis/Occlusion.
NCT02198105
Vienna Absolute Trial: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Stenting in the Superficial Femoral Artery
NCT00281060
Outcomes of Atherectomy and Balloon Angioplasty Compared to Conventional Angioplasty in Infra-popliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
NCT07120555
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With the introduction of cutting balloons the problems of elastic recoil and residual stenosis might be resolved, by reduction of vessel wall trauma, vessel wall inflammation and consequently reduced neointima formation.
The promising results especially in coronary arteries led us to initiate a RCT comparing primary PTA vs. CB-PTA for treatment of femoropoliteal obstructions in patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
angioplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous stent placement at or immediatly adjacent to target lesion,
* History of anti-platelet-therapy intolerance or adverse reaction to heparin,
* Bleeding diathesis,
* Creatinine \> 2,5 mg/dL,
* Active bacterial infection,
* Allergy to contrast media
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Vienna
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jasmin Amighi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna
Martin Schillinger, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna
Manfred Cejna, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Amighi J, Schillinger M, Dick P, Schlager O, Sabeti S, Mlekusch W, Haumer M, Mathies R, Heinzle G, Schuster A, Loewe C, Koppensteiner R, Lammer J, Minar E, Cejna M. De novo superficial femoropopliteal artery lesions: peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty and restenosis rates--randomized controlled trial. Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):267-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070749. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Version 2.0-12/2003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.