Coronary Revascularization Versus Conservative Therapy in Patients With Treated Critical Limb Ischemia
NCT ID: NCT03712644
Last Updated: 2018-11-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
650 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-11
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The INCORPORATE trial is designed to be non-blinded, open-label, prospective 1:1 randomized controlled multicentric trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Balloon Angioplasty vs. Cutting Balloon Angioplasty of Femoropopliteal Arteries- a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT00437905
Best Endovascular vs. Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia
NCT02060630
Comparison of Stenting Versus Best Medical Therapy for Treatment of Ostial Renal Artery Stenosis: a Trial in Patients With Advanced Atherosclerosis
NCT00711984
Efficacy of Subintimal vs Intraluminal Approach for Atherosclerotic Chronic Occlusive Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
NCT02544555
PTA vs. CB-PTA for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis
NCT00481780
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conservative
Patients will receive primarily optimal medical therapy alone and followed, according to protocol. Any further cardiologic investigation will be performed only in case of clinical suspicion of myocardial ischemia related symptoms.
No interventions assigned to this group
Invasive
In the Invasive group in addition to optimal medical therapy elective coronary angiography will be performed. Coronary catheterization is preferably scheduled within a maximum of 14 days after peripheral revascularization
All lesions of 50-90% diameter stenosis in a major coronary artery will be evaluated by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intervened by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if FFR≤0.80 or left for medical therapy if FFR\>0.80. All lesions of ≥90% diameter stenosis in a major coronary artery will be intervened. This includes also efforts to recanalize chronic total occlusions (CTO) of large supplied viable myocardial territory.
For complex cases revascularization by coronary artery bypass surgery might be considered, however PCI is preferred whenever possible.
FFR-guided coronary revascularization
Stenoses in range of 50-90% diameter stenosis in major coronary arteries will be assessed by FFR, and revascularized if FFR equal to or lower than 0.80. Lesions above 90% diameter stenosis in will be revascularized without further assessment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FFR-guided coronary revascularization
Stenoses in range of 50-90% diameter stenosis in major coronary arteries will be assessed by FFR, and revascularized if FFR equal to or lower than 0.80. Lesions above 90% diameter stenosis in will be revascularized without further assessment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
* contraindication for guideline-conform longterm antiplatelet/anticoagulation regime after PCI;
* heart failure with ejection fraction below 35%;
* significant valvular heart disease with indication for surgical or percutaneous repair;
* any concomitant disease with a life expectancy less than 2 years;
* severe renal dysfunction with glomerular filtration rate below 30 mL/min/1.73m2;
* ongoing sepsis.
Patients, who cannot be enrolled for any reasons will enter a prospective registry.
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Graz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gabor Toth-Gayor
Staff-member interventional cardiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gabor G Toth, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Div. Cardiology, Dept. Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
Zoltan Ruzsa, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bacs-Kiskun County Hospital, Kecskemet, Hungary
Marianne Brodmann, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Div. Angiology, Dept. Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Div. Cardiology and Div. Angiology, Dept. Medicine, Medical University Graz
Graz, , Austria
Bacs-Kiskun County Hospital
Kecskemét, , Hungary
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Toth GG, Brodmann M, Kanoun Schnur SS, Bartus S, Vrsalovic M, Krestianinov O, Kala P, Bil J, Gil R, Kanovsky J, Di Serafino L, Paolucci L, Barbato E, Mangiacapra F, Ruzsa Z. Intentional coronary revascularization versus conservative therapy in patients after peripheral artery revascularization due to critical limb ischemia: the INCORPORATE trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Aug;114(8):991-999. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02487-2. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
Toth G, Brodmann M, Barbato E, Mangiacapra F, Schneller L, Orias V, Gil R, Bil J, Bartus S, Ruzsa Z. Rational and design of the INtentional COronary revascularization versus conservative therapy in patients undergOing successful peripheRAl arTEry revascularization due to critical limb ischemia trial (INCORPORATE trial). Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30-194 ex 17/18
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.