Endoscopic Assisted Anterior Hyaloid Peeling in Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis (KPro-HP-Endo)

NCT ID: NCT04337944

Last Updated: 2023-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-08

Study Completion Date

2025-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Common complications of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) surgery include retroprosthetic membrane formation, glaucoma, and retinal detachment. Often pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is performed at the same time as KPro surgery for different indications. It has been shown to reduce postoperative complications in comparison to when it is performed after the KPro surgery. Patients who receive a complete PPV with peeling of the anterior hyaloid membrane have a lower incidence of retroprosthetic membrane formation and less vision loss due to glaucoma when compared to patients with partial PPV or anterior vitrectomy. During a complete PPV, peeling of the anterior hyaloid membrane is a difficult step because visualisation is poor, but it can be improved using endoscopy. The investigators suggest that peeling of the anterior hyaloid membrane assisted by endoscopy during KPro surgery would decrease postoperative complications in comparison to a PPV done after KPro surgery and without endoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) surgery is the most common corneal graft and is used to restore vision in patients with high risk of failure with traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Common complications of KPro surgery include retroprosthetic membrane formation behind the backplate of the KPro. Glaucoma is the most common threat to vision rehabilitation in patients with KPro. Glaucoma is often present before surgery and progresses after KPro, seven times faster than in patients with only glaucoma. Retinal detachment is a common posterior segment complication that arises post-KPro and can lead to a serious loss of vision. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is the standard treatment for patients with vitreoretinal diseases and opacities. PPV can include peeling of the anterior hyaloid membrane to ensure total resection of the vitreous body. PPV allows for example for retroprosthetic membrane excision, installation or revision of a glaucoma drainage device, or repair of retinal detachment. Often PPV is performed at the same time as KPro surgery for different indications. It has been shown to reduce postoperative complications in comparison to when it is performed after the KPro surgery. Patients who receive a complete PPV with peeling of the anterior hyaloid membrane have a lower incidence of retroprosthetic membrane formation and less vision loss due to glaucoma when compared to patients with partial PPV or anterior vitrectomy. Combined surgeries of KPro and PPV offer a complete evaluation of the optic nerve and of the retina, which would not be possible otherwise. During a complete PPV, peeling of the anterior hyaloid membrane is a difficult step because visualisation is poor, especially with a KPro in place. Visualisation can be improved using endoscopy to visualize the inside of the eye over 360 degrees. The investigators suggest that peeling of the anterior hyaloid membrane assisted by endoscopy during KPro surgery would decrease postoperative complications in comparison to a PPV done after KPro surgery and without endoscopy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Corneal Transplantation Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Postoperative Complications Vitrectomy Endoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Interventional prospective study on patients receiving a Boston keratoprosthesis type 1, using a retrospective group as the control group.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with KPro, PPV, and endoscopy

Patients will receive at the same time a Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) with a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with anterior hyaloid membrane peeling assisted by endoscopy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 and anterior hyaloid membrane peeling assisted by endoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive at the same time a Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) with a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with anterior hyaloid membrane peeling assisted by endoscopy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 and anterior hyaloid membrane peeling assisted by endoscopy

Patients will receive at the same time a Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) with a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with anterior hyaloid membrane peeling assisted by endoscopy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged from 18 to 80 years old
* Informed consent
* Boston keratoprosthesis candidate
* Pars plana vitrectomy candidate
* Ability to be followed for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Aged less than 18 or more than 80 years old
* Inability to give informed consent
* Repeat Boston keratoprosthesis
* Repeat pars plana vitrectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mona Harissi-Dagher, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marie-Catherine Tessier, M.Sc.

Role: CONTACT

1-514-890-8000 ext. 11550

Dominique Geoffrion, B.Sc.

Role: CONTACT

1-514-890-8000 ext. 11550

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marie-Catherine Tessier, M.Sc.

Role: primary

1-514-890-8000 ext. 11550

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Szigiato AA, Bostan C, Nayman T, Harissi-Dagher M. Long-term visual outcomes of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis in Canada. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;104(11):1601-1607. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315345. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32066560 (View on PubMed)

Wang Q, Harissi-Dagher M. Characteristics and management of patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis explantation--the University of Montreal Hospital Center experience. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;158(6):1297-1304.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.08.037. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25174898 (View on PubMed)

Harissi-Dagher M, Durr GM, Biernacki K, Sebag M, Rheaume MA. Pars plana vitrectomy through the Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1. Eye (Lond). 2013 Jun;27(6):767-9. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.58. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23579405 (View on PubMed)

Robert MC, Pomerleau V, Harissi-Dagher M. Complications associated with Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 and glaucoma drainage devices. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 May;97(5):573-7. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302770. Epub 2013 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23435225 (View on PubMed)

Moussally K, Harissi-Dagher M. Long-term complications associated with glaucoma drainage devices and Boston keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;152(5):883-4; author reply 884-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.07.014. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22017851 (View on PubMed)

Talajic JC, Agoumi Y, Gagne S, Moussally K, Harissi-Dagher M. Prevalence, progression, and impact of glaucoma on vision after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;153(2):267-274.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.07.022. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21982110 (View on PubMed)

Dohlman CH, Zhou C, Lei F, Cade F, Regatieri CV, Crnej A, Dohlman JG, Shen LQ, Paschalis EI. Glaucoma After Corneal Trauma or Surgery-A Rapid, Inflammatory, IOP-Independent Pathway. Cornea. 2019 Dec;38(12):1589-1594. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31453878 (View on PubMed)

Crnej A, Paschalis EI, Salvador-Culla B, Tauber A, Drnovsek-Olup B, Shen LQ, Dohlman CH. Glaucoma progression and role of glaucoma surgery in patients with Boston keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 2014 Apr;33(4):349-54. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000067.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24531120 (View on PubMed)

Khan BF, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan DM, Dohlman CH. Advances in Boston keratoprosthesis: enhancing retention and prevention of infection and inflammation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2007 Spring;47(2):61-71. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e318036bd8b. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17450007 (View on PubMed)

Boscher C, Kuhn F. Endoscopic evaluation and dissection of the anterior vitreous base. Ophthalmic Res. 2015;53(2):90-9. doi: 10.1159/000370032. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25633467 (View on PubMed)

Modjtahedi BS, Eliott D. Vitreoretinal complications of the Boston Keratoprosthesis. Semin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Nov;29(5-6):338-48. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2014.959204.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25325859 (View on PubMed)

Yu YZ, Zou YP, Zou XL. Endoscopy-assisted vitrectomy in the anterior vitreous. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 18;11(3):506-511. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.23. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29600187 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE19.382

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.