The Effect of Fluids on Aortic VTI During C-section

NCT ID: NCT04330742

Last Updated: 2024-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-25

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pregnancy is associated with a myriad of physiologic changes, including expansion of blood volume, decrease in oncotic pressure, and increased cardiac output. The obstetric population is associated with intrapartum hemorrhage. Accordingly, it is important to have an accurate method to assess fluid status in intrapartum patients. The use of standard volume assessment tools including arterial lines and central venous catheters is limited given the brevity of obstetric procedures and the morbidity of these techniques on the awake patients, and the costs. Non-invasive methods to assess volume status (carotid dopplers, direct measurement of blood loss, bio-impedance devices) are imperfect. Echocardiography is an attractive tool to measure fluid status in experienced operators such as anesthesiologists. IVC diameter and variation of aortic velocity time integral are two measures that can be obtained via echocardiography and been studied in spontaneously breathing patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether these measurements can be used in the assessment of volume status in the laboring patient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pregnancy is associated with a myriad of physiologic changes, including expansion of blood volume, decrease in oncotic pressure, and increased cardiac output. Comorbidities including maternal hypertension, renal or cardiac disease may further complicate the assessment of volume status and are associated with increased risks related to fluid administration (c). In addition, the majority of obstetric patients receive neuraxial analgesia or anesthesia to facilitate both vaginal and operative delivery. These techniques are associated with hemodynamic changes including maternal hypotension secondary to a decrease in SVR and CO. These changes may in turn be associated with a reduction in placental blood flow affecting fetal outcome, and may also cause maternal nausea, vomiting and dizziness. Further, the obstetric population is high risk for intrapartum hemorrhage. As such, it is critical to have an accurate method to assess fluid status in intrapartum patients.

The use of invasive volume assessment tools including arterial lines and central venous catheters is limited given the brevity of obstetric procedures, the morbidity of these invasive techniques for the awake patient, and the associated time and costs (b). Non-invasive methods that assess volume status in the obstetric population include techniques such as direct measurement of blood loss (g), carotid dopplers (c), bio-impedence devices (f); However these methods have been shown to be imperfect and are not widely used.

Echocardiography is a non-invasive, widely-available tool that can provide rapid information for experienced operators such as anesthesiologists. Respiratory variations in inferior vena cava diameter (IVCd) and variation in aortic velocity time integral (∆VTI) following passive leg raise have been extensively studied in spontaneously breathing patients. IVCd has been shown to predict fluid responsiveness, however requires a high threshold (\>40-50% collapsibility) to detect a difference. IVCd may also change with diaphragmatic motion, thus results may be confounded if the patient becomes tachypneic (d) or is spontaneously breathing (g). In contrast, aortic velocity time integral (∆VTI) may be a more sensitive indicator of volume status. Lamia et al showed a 12% change in VTI as 77% sensitive and 100% specific for a 15% change in cardiac output following 500 mL volume expansion in ICU patients with shock (both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated, e). While there are some studies of IVC collapsibility in the obstetric population, there are limited data on VTI as a measure of volume status in laboring patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the aortic velocity time integral (VTI) is influenced by intravascular fluid administration during cesarean section. Secondary aims include determining whether inferior vena cava diameter (IVCd), blood pressure, and heart rate are influenced by intravascular fluid administration during cesarean section. Additionally, total amount of vasopressor agents administered during the procedure will be recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Related Hemorrhage Fluid Overload Labor Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

0 mL crystalloid

These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 0, at which time 0 mL of fluids will have been administered.

lactated ringers

Intervention Type DRUG

the intervention is one liter fluid bag of lactated ringers which is routinely used as a fluid coload for spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive the same amount of fluids however this will be paused at various time points in order to perform the echocardiogram.

250 mL crystalloid.

These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 1, after the spinal has been placed and approximately 250 mL fluids has been administered.

lactated ringers

Intervention Type DRUG

the intervention is one liter fluid bag of lactated ringers which is routinely used as a fluid coload for spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive the same amount of fluids however this will be paused at various time points in order to perform the echocardiogram.

500 mL crystalloid

These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 2, at which time 500 mL of fluids will have been administered.

lactated ringers

Intervention Type DRUG

the intervention is one liter fluid bag of lactated ringers which is routinely used as a fluid coload for spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive the same amount of fluids however this will be paused at various time points in order to perform the echocardiogram.

1000 mL crystalloid

These are the measurements (aortic velocity time integral, inferior vena cava diameter, vital signs) that will be taken at time 3, at which time 1000 mL of fluids will have been administered.

lactated ringers

Intervention Type DRUG

the intervention is one liter fluid bag of lactated ringers which is routinely used as a fluid coload for spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive the same amount of fluids however this will be paused at various time points in order to perform the echocardiogram.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lactated ringers

the intervention is one liter fluid bag of lactated ringers which is routinely used as a fluid coload for spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive the same amount of fluids however this will be paused at various time points in order to perform the echocardiogram.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

crystalloid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy nulliparous or multiparous pregnant women with a term (\>37 weeks gestation)
* age 18-35
* singleton pregnancy
* scheduled for Cesarean delivery with planned neuraxial spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia
* American Society for Anesthesiologists physical status 2

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients without ability to provide informed consent
* American Society for Anesthesiologists physical status 3 or 4
* Emergency cesarean section
* BMI\>40
* Known cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities including chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, diabetes, asthma, renal disease
* Age \> 35
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baylor College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amy Lee

Associate Professor of Obstetric Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amy Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Baylor College of Medicine

Yi Deng, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Baylor College of Medicine

Claudia Wei, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Baylor College of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ben Taub General Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Amy Lee, MD

Role: CONTACT

713-793-8805

Claudia Wei, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Claudia Wei, MD

Role: primary

Amy Lee, MD

Role: backup

713-793-8805

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an effective technique using combination phenylephrine infusion and crystalloid cohydration. Anesthesiology. 2005 Oct;103(4):744-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16192766 (View on PubMed)

Zieleskiewicz L, Noel A, Duclos G, Haddam M, Delmas A, Bechis C, Loundou A, Blanc J, Mignon A, Bouvet L, Einav S, Bourgoin A, Leone M. Can point-of-care ultrasound predict spinal hypotension during caesarean section? A prospective observational study. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jan;73(1):15-22. doi: 10.1111/anae.14063. Epub 2017 Oct 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28986931 (View on PubMed)

Zieleskiewicz L, Bouvet L, Einav S, Duclos G, Leone M. Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound: applications in obstetric anaesthetic management. Anaesthesia. 2018 Oct;73(10):1265-1279. doi: 10.1111/anae.14354. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30047997 (View on PubMed)

Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1125-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0646-7. Epub 2007 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17508199 (View on PubMed)

McIntyre JP, Ellyett KM, Mitchell EA, Quill GM, Thompson JM, Stewart AW, Doughty RN, Stone PR; Maternal Sleep in Pregnancy Study Group. Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 28;15:70. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25886289 (View on PubMed)

Hancock A, Weeks AD, Lavender DT. Is accurate and reliable blood loss estimation the 'crucial step' in early detection of postpartum haemorrhage: an integrative review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 28;15:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0653-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26415952 (View on PubMed)

Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, Mahjoub Y, Lorne E, Levrard M, Ammenouche N, Seydi A, Tinturier F, Lobjoie E, Dupont H, Slama M. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit Care. 2015 Nov 13;19:400. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26563768 (View on PubMed)

Brun C, Zieleskiewicz L, Textoris J, Muller L, Bellefleur JP, Antonini F, Tourret M, Ortega D, Vellin A, Lefrant JY, Boubli L, Bretelle F, Martin C, Leone M. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Apr;39(4):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2770-2. Epub 2012 Dec 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23223774 (View on PubMed)

Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, Quintard H, Leone M, Zoric L, Lefrant JY; AzuRea group. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care. 2012 Oct 8;16(5):R188. doi: 10.1186/cc11672.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23043910 (View on PubMed)

Maizel J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, Tribouilloy C, Massy Z, Slama M. Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1133-1138. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0642-y. Epub 2007 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17508202 (View on PubMed)

Gardin JM, Davidson DM, Rohan MK, Butman S, Knoll M, Garcia R, Dubria S, Gardin SK, Henry WL. Relationship between age, body size, gender, and blood pressure and Doppler flow measurements in the aorta and pulmonary artery. Am Heart J. 1987 Jan;113(1):101-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90016-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2948377 (View on PubMed)

Tawfik MM, Tarbay AI, Elaidy AM, Awad KA, Ezz HM, Tolba MA. Combined Colloid Preload and Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Feb;128(2):304-312. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003306.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29461392 (View on PubMed)

Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):270-300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26580836 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H45744

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.