Randomized Trial Comparing Gastric Bypass With and Without Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT04324515

Last Updated: 2020-03-27

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 90 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2018-07-18
• Study Completion Date: 2022-03-01

Brief Summary

The main objective of this pilot study is to show feasibility to collect peri-operative and postoperative clinical data of the study group of gastric bypass without cholecystectomy compared with the control group of gastric bypass with cholecystectomy. Our hypothesis is that the approach without cholecystectomy would be superior in terms of a decrease of perioperative adverse events and postoperative complications, as well as lenght of operation, lenght of hospital stay, overall costs with a very low risk of biliary complication in the follow up. These findings could be helpful to build a baseline for a future randomized controlled multicenter study allowing significance of these results and help orientate surgeons towards best surgical care of the gallbladder with confirmed absence of stones in the obese patient undergoing gastric bypass.

Detailed Description

We suggest performing a prospective randomized pilot trial comparing RYGB without concomitant cholecystectomy with RYGB with concomitant cholecystectomy for patients with absence of gallstones in preoperative ultrasound. Patients with ultrasonographically confirmed gallstones in the gallbladder undergo concomitant cholecystectomy at time of RYGB and are excluded from the study.Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized according to a randomization list generated by the CRC of the University Hospital of Geneva. The randomization envelops will be opened by the study staff at the appropriate time prior to the scheduling of gastric bypass after subject selection. The randomization assignment insert will contain information specifying whether the cholecystectomy will be performed or not during gastric bypass procedure.

A total of 90 consecutive obese patients attending the Unit of Visceral Surgery of the University Hospital of Geneva who meet the criteria for bariatric surgery and where the preoperative ultrasound confirms absence of gallstones will be recruited for the study.

A prospective open randomized pilot study design will be used. At 6 follow-up visits (at discharge, 1 ,3 ,6 ,12 and 18 months post-surgery), patients will be evaluated.

This study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the ICH-GCP or ISO EN 14155 as wella s all national legal and regulatory requirements, the LPth (Loi sur les produits thérapeutiques 812.21) and the OClin (Ordonnance sur les essais cliniques des produits thérapeutiques 812.214.2).

Description of surgical technique One optical trocar, three 12 mm trocars and one 5 mm trocar are placed. No additional trocar has to be placed for concomitant cholecystectomy. The intervention will start with the cholecystectomy laparoscopically. A small gastric pouch (around 20-30 cc) is created using blue cartridge staplers. A standard robotic RYGB with a 75 cm biliary limb and a 150 cm antecolic alimentary limb is performed. A hand-sewn gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomois are performed, using a single layer running suture of Vicryl 2.0.

Data Collection:

Pre-Operative demographic data and other variables will be collected at baseline and at some of the 6 follow-up points (at discharge, 1,3,6,12,18 months):

Ultrasound, Patient Demographics and pre-Operative History will be collected, including: Gender, age on admission for operation, BMI, Height, Weight, ASA score, history of abdominal surgery, co- morbidities (Type 2 diabetes requiring Insulin or oral medication), Hypertension requiring medication, Coronary heart disease, including history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary artery surgery Pulmonary comorbidities including history of pulmonary embolism, Sleep Apnea Tobacco use, Medication used by patient, Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, laboratory findings, QOL using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

Intra-Operative Assessment: Intra-Operative data such as complications (organ lesion, bleeding, conversion), operative time, docking times, estimated blood loss will be collected

Post-Operative Assessment: From surgery to discharge, the following patient information will be collected: complications according to Clavien/Dindo Classification system, re- operation, re-admission, length of hospital stay

Our hypothesis is that the approach without cholecystectomy would be superior in terms of a decrease of perioperative adverse events and postoperative complications, as well as lenght of operation, lenght of hospital stay, overall costs with a very low risk of biliary complication in the follow up.

Conditions

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass; Cholecystitis; Gallstone; Gallbladder Diseases

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: OTHER
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Study Arm without cholecystectomy

Study Arm: Patients with gastric bypass without concomitant cholecystectomy

Group Type: OTHER

Robotic gastric bypass with or without cholecystectomy

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Study Arm: robotic gastric bypass without cholecystectomy Control Arm: robotic gastric bypass with cholecystectomy

Control Arm with cholecystectomy

Control Arm: Patients with gastric bypass with concomitant cholecystectomy

Group Type: OTHER

Robotic gastric bypass with or without cholecystectomy

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Study Arm: robotic gastric bypass without cholecystectomy Control Arm: robotic gastric bypass with cholecystectomy

Interventions

Robotic gastric bypass with or without cholecystectomy

Study Arm: robotic gastric bypass without cholecystectomy Control Arm: robotic gastric bypass with cholecystectomy

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients must meet the criteria of the Swiss society for the study of morbid obesity (SMOB) to undergo gastric bypass (19):

• BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2
• Having followed a 2 year adequate program of weight loss without success or a 1 year program in case of "superobesity" (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)
• Consent to multidisciplinary follow up for 5 years
• Preoperative ultrasound without presence of gallstones or polyps
• Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients which have a contra-indication for gastric bypass according to the criteria of the Swiss society for the study of morbid obesity (SMOB) to undergo gastric bypass (19):

• Pregnancy
• Kidney failure (creatinine ≥ 300mmol/l, GFR < 30ml/min) without dialysis
• Cirrhosis Child B/C
• Ulcerative Colitis
• Pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis during the last 6 months
• Psychiatric contra indications
• Drug abuse (alcohol, cannabis, opioids) during the last 6 months
• Presence of gallstones on preoperative Ultrasound (which will require concomitant cholecystectomy)
• Patients with clinical diagnosis of cholecystitis defined as right upper quadrant abdominal pain, radiological signs of cholecystits and laboratory signs of infection or gallstone migration, defined as right upper quadrant and abnormal liver function tests (any increase in AST, ALT, alkaline Phosphatase, GGT and/or bilirubin).
• Previous bariatric surgery other than gastric banding
• Open bypass procedure
• Medical conditions preventing informed consent

Preoperative routine work-up includes a physical examination, vital parameters, laboratory analyses (hematology, chemistry and HbA1c), sleep apnea evaluation with Polygraphia, abdominal ultrasound, endoscopy of the stomach, pulmonary function, preoperative anesthesia consultation and psychological evaluation.

The results of these routine tests will be used to assess the patients'eligiibility to participate to the proposed pilot study.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

University of Geneva, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Jung Minoa

Dr.med.

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Minoa Jung, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva

Locations

Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Switzerland

Central Contacts

Minoa Jung, MD

Role: CONTACT

minoa.jung@hcuge.ch

+41788497695

Marion Dietrich

Role: CONTACT

marion.dietrich@hcuge.ch

Facility Contacts

Marion Dietrich

Role: primary

marion.dietrich@hcuge.ch

Minoa Jung, MD

Role: backup

minoa.jung@hcuge.ch

+41795534416

References

Mason EE, Renquist KE. Gallbladder management in obesity surgery. Obes Surg. 2002 Apr;12(2):222-9. doi: 10.1381/096089202762552395.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 11975217 (View on PubMed)

Schmidt JH, Hocking MP, Rout WR, Woodward ER. The case for prophylactic cholecystectomy concomitant with gastric restriction for morbid obesity. Am Surg. 1988 May;54(5):269-72.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 3364862 (View on PubMed)

Shiffman ML, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Brewer WH, Moore EW. Gallstone formation after rapid weight loss: a prospective study in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery for treatment of morbid obesity. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Aug;86(8):1000-5.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 1858735 (View on PubMed)

Everhart JE. Contributions of obesity and weight loss to gallstone disease. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Nov 15;119(10):1029-35. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00010.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 8214980 (View on PubMed)

Worni M, Guller U, Shah A, Gandhi M, Shah J, Rajgor D, Pietrobon R, Jacobs DO, Ostbye T. Cholecystectomy concomitant with laparoscopic gastric bypass: a trend analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2008. Obes Surg. 2012 Feb;22(2):220-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0575-y.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 22183984 (View on PubMed)

Patel KR, White SC, Tejirian T, Han SH, Russell D, Vira D, Liao L, Patel KB, Gracia C, Haigh P, Dutson E, Mehran A. Gallbladder management during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: routine preoperative screening for gallstones and postoperative prophylactic medical treatment are not necessary. Am Surg. 2006 Oct;72(10):857-61.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 17058721 (View on PubMed)

Weinsier RL, Ullmann DO. Gallstone formation and weight loss. Obes Res. 1993 Jan;1(1):51-6. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1993.tb00008.x.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 16350561 (View on PubMed)

Wudel LJ Jr, Wright JK, Debelak JP, Allos TM, Shyr Y, Chapman WC. Prevention of gallstone formation in morbidly obese patients undergoing rapid weight loss: results of a randomized controlled pilot study. J Surg Res. 2002 Jan;102(1):50-6. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2001.6322.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 11792152 (View on PubMed)

Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Ukegjini K, Beutner U, Guller U, Schmied BM, Muller SA, Schultes B, Thurnheer M. Concomitant cholecystectomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese patients is not justified: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2013 Mar;23(3):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0852-4.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 23315094 (View on PubMed)

Villegas L, Schneider B, Provost D, Chang C, Scott D, Sims T, Hill L, Hynan L, Jones D. Is routine cholecystectomy required during laparoscopic gastric bypass? Obes Surg. 2004 Jan;14(1):60-6. doi: 10.1381/096089204772787301.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 14980035 (View on PubMed)

Tucker ON, Fajnwaks P, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Is concomitant cholecystectomy necessary in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery? Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2450-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9769-3. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 18288531 (View on PubMed)

Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, Jung M, Chassot G, Huber O, Hagen ME, Pugin F. Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg. 2014 Dec;24(12):2031-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1335-6.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 24962109 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

2016-01243

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id