Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites

NCT ID: NCT04324008

Last Updated: 2025-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-01

Study Completion Date

2026-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate a self-adhesive flowable resin composite, a flowable resin composite with high viscosity and a conventional flowable resin composite in combination with a universal adhesive using two different application modes. All patients will receive at least 4 occlusal restorations. Cavities will be divided into four groups according to restorative systems used: Constic (a self-adhering flowable composite), G-ænial Universal Flo (a highly filled flowable composite), Tetric N-Flow (self-etch) (a conventional flowable composite), Tetrin N-Flow (etch\&rinse).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Constic

Constic (DMG, Hamburg, Germany)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Constic

Intervention Type DEVICE

Flowable resin composite

G-ænial Universal Flo

G-ænial Universal Flo (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in combination with G-Premio Bond (self-etch mode)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

G-ænial Universal Flo

Intervention Type DEVICE

Flowable resin composite

Tetric N-Flow (self-etch)

Tetric N-Flow (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in combination with Tetric N-Bond Universal (self-etch mode)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tetric N-Flow (self-etch)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, self-etch mode)

Tetric N-Flow (etch&rinse)

Tetric N-Flow (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in combination with Tetric N-Bond Universal (etch\&rinse mode)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tetric N-Flow (etch&rinse)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, etch\&rinse mode)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Constic

Flowable resin composite

Intervention Type DEVICE

G-ænial Universal Flo

Flowable resin composite

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tetric N-Flow (self-etch)

Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, self-etch mode)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tetric N-Flow (etch&rinse)

Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, etch\&rinse mode)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* having no medical or behavioral problems preventing then from attending review visits
* absence of previously placed restorations
* having antagonist teeth

Exclusion Criteria

* poor gingival health
* uncontrolled, rampant caries
* bruxism
* removable partial dentures
* xerostomia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Fatma Dilşad Öz

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hacettepe University

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Flowable composites

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Comparison of Different Adhesives in NCCLs
NCT04481087 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Clinical Evaluation of a Bioactive Material
NCT04825379 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Clinical Performance of Different Resin Cements
NCT04694690 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA