Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite in Class I Cavities

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical performance of a self-adhering flowable resin composite in comparison with a conventional flowable resin composite used with an etch\&rinse adhesive system in minimally invasive class I cavities. Twenty-five patients will receive at least one pair of class I restorations. After class I cavities were prepared they were restored either with a self-adhering flowable resin composite (VertiseFlow/Kerr-VR) or with a flowable resin composite (Luxaflow/DMG-LX) in combination with an etch\&rinse adhesive (Teco/DMG) \[according to the manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be evaluated at baseline and yearly according to FDI criteria by two evaluaters. Statistical analysis will be carried out with Pearson Chi-Square test and Cochran Q-test followed by Mc Nemar's.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites

NCT04324008

Tooth Diseases

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

A 24-month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations

NCT03527953

Dental Caries

COMPLETED NA

Clinical Performance of a Highly-filled Flowable Composite in Class III Restorations.

NCT07051551

Dental Caries

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of Esthetic Performance of Resin Infiltration Technique on Enamel Lesions

NCT02896556

Tooth Demineralization

COMPLETED NA

Follow-up of Indirect Restorations Luted With Different Adhesive Resin Cement

NCT05551481

Dental Restoration Failures

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vertise Flow

Superficial Class I cavities restored with Vertise Flow

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vertise Flow

Intervention Type DEVICE

Composite resin

LuxaFlow

Superficial Class I cavities restored with LuxaFlow

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LuxaFlow

Intervention Type DEVICE

Composite resin

Teco Adhesive

Intervention Type DEVICE

Adhesive system

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vertise Flow

Composite resin

Intervention Type DEVICE

LuxaFlow

Composite resin

Intervention Type DEVICE

Teco Adhesive

Adhesive system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Self-adhering flowable composite Flowable composite with Teco adhesive system

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* having no medical or behavioral problems preventing then from attending review visits, absence of previously placed restorations,having antagonist teeth