Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Intensity on Leg Muscle Fatigability in Healthy Adults
NCT ID: NCT04321304
Last Updated: 2021-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-01
2019-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prospective participants will include 40 healthy young adults (all right-side dominant) that will be recruited to complete four randomly ordered stimulation sessions (Baseline, 2 mA, 4 mA, and sham), separated by at least 5 days. Each session will involve one visit to the Integrative Neurophysiology Laboratory (INPL) and will last for approximately one hour. We expect data collection to last 6 months. The first session includes leg strength measurements and fatigue tasks of both legs, as well as a baseline 6 min walk test (6MWT) to determine fatigued walking characteristics. The following three sessions will include performing a random tDCS condition (2 mA, 4 mA, or sham) over the brain area that controls the participant's dominant leg for 15 minutes prior to and then throughout the duration of the fatigue task of the dominant leg (16-20 min total stimulation time). The fatigue task for the nondominant leg will be performed after a 10 minute energy recovery period. After the fatigue task has been completed for both legs, the participants will perform the 6MWT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
4 mA tDCS, Estrogen, and Leg Muscle Fatigability
NCT04471805
Evaluation of the Hypoalgesic Effects of Transcranial Direct Current (tDCS) in Healthy Subjects
NCT04127253
Intensity-Dependent Effects of 4-week Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Healthy Young Adults
NCT07089069
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02768129
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) as an Intervention for Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02849223
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sham
Participants will have the anode (active electrode) placed over the brain area the controls their dominant leg and the cathode (return electrode) above the ipsilateral eyebrow. Stimulation is turned on (2 mA) for the 30 seconds at the beginning and the end of the trial, but stays at 0 mA in the intervening time.
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) at the beginning and the end of a given stimulation period to control for potential placebo-like effects or participant expectation bias.
2 mA
Participants will have the anode (active electrode) placed over the brain area the controls their dominant leg and the cathode (return electrode) above the ipsilateral eyebrow. Stimulation is ramped up to 2 mA over the first 30 seconds and stays at 2 mA for the remainder of the stimulation time.
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 2 mA
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
4 mA
Participants will have the anode (active electrode) placed over the brain area the controls their dominant leg and the cathode (return electrode) above the ipsilateral eyebrow. Stimulation is ramped up to 4 mA over the first 30 seconds and stays at 4 mA for the remainder of the stimulation time.
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 4 mA
Uses weak electrical current (4 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) at the beginning and the end of a given stimulation period to control for potential placebo-like effects or participant expectation bias.
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 2 mA
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 4 mA
Uses weak electrical current (4 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. right-side dominant
3. able to independently walk for 6 min
4. at least 30 min of moderate-intensity, physical activity on at least 3 days of the week for at least the last 3 months
5. without chronic neurological, psychiatric, or medical conditions
6. not taking any psychoactive medications
Exclusion Criteria
2. known holes or fissures in the skull
3. metallic objects or implanted devices in the skull (e.g., metal plate)
4. current student of study personnel
5. under the direct supervision of study personnel
18 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Iowa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Craig D. Workman, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig D Workman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201902799
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.