Cardial-MASS-Study: Influencing Factors on Reliability of Selfreported Weight and Height

NCT ID: NCT04321057

Last Updated: 2020-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

731 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Height and weight are important informations in clinical life. Medication is dosed by them and weight, especially overweight, is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Mostly you have to rely on the self-reported informations, because there is plenty of work and little time to weigh and measure every patient. But can the investigators really trust this informations? Former studies have shown, that most of self-reported heights and weights differ from the measured ones. This fact might lead to a wrong dosage of medicine or underestimated risk factors. So the Cardial-MASS-Study tries to detect influencing factors on the reliability of self-reported informations especially among patients, treated at the cardiological department at Saarland University.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Weight and height of patients is often recorded in clinical practice, as well as in clinical research. They give important informations for medication dosages, e.g., anticoagulants or anesthesias. Furthermore, the body mass index (BMI), calculated by weight and height, is an easy instrument to estimate a patient's risk for cardiovascular diseases based on obesity.

In clinical practice, informations about height and weight do often rely on self-reported values instead of measured ones. This can be due to limited timely, but also instrumental resources, when scales or measuring tapes are not available. Unfortunately, these self-reported informations are often inaccurate. Age, education, weight, and sex seam to influence and distort them in different ways.

Former studies have shown, that a lot of patients overestimate their height \[1-8\] and underestimate their weight \[1-6\]. This might lead to a wrong classification in normal weight and overweight using BMI. Among elderly (\>60 years) informations relying on measured values and on self-reported values seem to be even more divergent \[10\].

People with overweight are tending to underestimate their weight stronger than people with normal weight. The higher the weight, the more the self-reported information deviates from the actual weight \[11,12\]. Men's informations are more exact than women's, like Niedhammer et al. has shown in a study with 7350 participants \[9\]. Men with a BMI lower than 25 even overestimated their weight. Compared to younger ones, elderly men underestimated their weight more often, and elderly women's self-reported weight was more accurate \[1,9\].

Next to age and gender, socioeconomic variables do influence self-reported measures. The higher the education or working position the more accurate the information about height. Noteworthy, women in high working positions overestimate their height, when compared to women in lower positions, who even underestimate their height \[2,5,6,8,9\].

Furthermore, external conditions of data acquisition may impact validity of self-reported information, too. Stewart supposed that informations given in an interview are more exact than those given in a questionnaire \[11\].

Most of the studies mentioned above are not exclusively related to patients with cardiovascular diseases. Studies referring to this patient population suggest, that men with cardiovascular diseases underestimate their weight less than others \[13\]. Nevertheless, Niedhammer et al. could not confirm this finding \[9\]. HEnce, the aim of this study is to identify factors that influence the validity of self-reported height and weight in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group questionnaire

Patient's height and weight are asked by questionnaire in this group. It includes patients at the cardiological department of Saarland University.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group male doctor

Patient's height and weight are asked by a male doctor in this group. It includes patients at the cardiological department of Saarland University.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group female doctor

Patient's height and weight are asked by a female doctor in this group. It includes patients at the cardiological department of Saarland University.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group male nurse

Patient's height and weight are asked by a male nurse in this group. It includes patients at the cardiological department of Saarland University.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group female nurse

Patient's height and weight are asked by a female nurse in this group. It includes patients at the cardiological department of Saarland University.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group family doctor

Patient's height and weight are asked by questionnaire in this group. This is the control group,including patients at a family doctor.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients at Innere Medizin III (Cardiology), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (UKS)
* cardiovascular disease (Coronar-Vessel-Disease, Arrhythmia, Heart-attack, Hypertonus, stable heart failure)
* Patients at a family doctor

Exclusion Criteria

* younger than 18 years
* Dementia
* cardial decompensation
* severe anemia (Hemoglobin\<9 mg/dl)
* cardial shock
* acute kidney failure
* factors, that prevent patients from answering the questionnaire
* factors, that prevent patients from being measured and weighted
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universität des Saarlandes

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinic for Internal Medicine, Cardioloy, Angioloy, and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital

Homburg, Saarland, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Palta M, Prineas RJ, Berman R, Hannan P. Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Feb;115(2):223-30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113294.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7058781 (View on PubMed)

Stewart AL. The reliability and validity of self-reported weight and height. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(4):295-309. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(82)90085-6. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7061685 (View on PubMed)

Millar WJ. Distribution of body weight and height: comparison of estimates based on self-reported and observed measures. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Dec;40(4):319-23. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.4.319.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3655624 (View on PubMed)

Stewart AW, Jackson RT, Ford MA, Beaglehole R. Underestimation of relative weight by use of self-reported height and weight. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jan;125(1):122-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114494.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3788941 (View on PubMed)

Rowland ML. Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Dec;52(6):1125-33. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/52.6.1125.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2239790 (View on PubMed)

Bowlin SJ, Morrill BD, Nafziger AN, Jenkins PL, Lewis C, Pearson TA. Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: the Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;46(6):561-71. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90129-o.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8501483 (View on PubMed)

Ziebland S, Thorogood M, Fuller A, Muir J. Desire for the body normal: body image and discrepancies between self reported and measured height and weight in a British population. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):105-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.105. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8762365 (View on PubMed)

Bostrom G, Diderichsen F. Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;26(4):860-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.4.860.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9279620 (View on PubMed)

Niedhammer I, Bugel I, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M, Leclerc A. Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Sep;24(9):1111-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801375.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11033979 (View on PubMed)

Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Jan;101(1):28-34; quiz 35-6. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00008-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11209581 (View on PubMed)

Jalkanen L, Tuomilehto J, Tanskanen A, Puska P. Accuracy of self-reported body weight compared to measured body weight. A population survey. Scand J Soc Med. 1987;15(3):191-8. doi: 10.1177/140349488701500311.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3616534 (View on PubMed)

Roberts RJ. Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight? Public Health. 1995 Jul;109(4):275-84. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80205-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7667492 (View on PubMed)

Jeffery RW. Bias in reported body weight as a function of education, occupation, health and weight concern. Addict Behav. 1996 Mar-Apr;21(2):217-22. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00050-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8730524 (View on PubMed)

Bray GA. Overweight is risking fate. Definition, classification, prevalence, and risks. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;499:14-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb36194.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3300479 (View on PubMed)

Pi-Sunyer FX. Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Oct 1;119(7 Pt 2):655-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-7_part_2-199310011-00006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8363192 (View on PubMed)

Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Ventura HO. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 26;53(21):1925-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.068.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19460605 (View on PubMed)

Kurth T, Gaziano JM, Berger K, Kase CS, Rexrode KM, Cook NR, Buring JE, Manson JE. Body mass index and the risk of stroke in men. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Dec 9-23;162(22):2557-62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.22.2557.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12456227 (View on PubMed)

Dorn JM, Schisterman EF, Winkelstein W Jr, Trevisan M. Body mass index and mortality in a general population sample of men and women. The Buffalo Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec 1;146(11):919-31. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009218.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9400333 (View on PubMed)

Bender R, Trautner C, Spraul M, Berger M. Assessment of excess mortality in obesity. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Jan 1;147(1):42-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009365.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9440397 (View on PubMed)

Coe TR, Halkes M, Houghton K, Jefferson D. The accuracy of visual estimation of weight and height in pre-operative supine patients. Anaesthesia. 1999 Jun;54(6):582-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00838.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10403874 (View on PubMed)

Hendershot KM, Robinson L, Roland J, Vaziri K, Rizzo AG, Fakhry SM. Estimated height, weight, and body mass index: implications for research and patient safety. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):887-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.018. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17116557 (View on PubMed)

Foil MB, Collier MS, MacDonald KG Jr, Pories WJ. Availability and Adequacy of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Equipment for the Morbidly Obese Patient in an Acute Care Setting. Obes Surg. 1993 May;3(2):153-156. doi: 10.1381/096089293765559494.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10757911 (View on PubMed)

Therre M, Kindermann I, Wedegartner SM, Gross S, Schwantke I, Mahfoud F, Bohm M. Determinants of reliability of self-reported height and weight and their impact on medication dosing: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e090020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40233951 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Cardial-MASS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.