Cognitive Prefrail and Frailty, and Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: Prevalence and Association With Incident Adverse Health Events

NCT ID: NCT04275817

Last Updated: 2024-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

30000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We defined a new and early condition in the spectrum of cognitive frailty: the "cognitive-prefrailty" which is a combination of prefrailty stage and subjective cognitive impairment (SCI). This study aims to: (1) examine and compare the prevalence of cognitive-prefrailty, cognitive frailty and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) syndromes in participants of the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) using the (tracking and comprehensive) baseline assessment, (2) examine the association of cognitive-prefrailty, cognitive frailty and MCR syndromes with incident adverse health events using the information collected during the first CLSA 18-month follow-up, and (3) compare the criteria performances (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, area under receiver operating characteristic curve, positive and negative likelihood ratio) for incident adverse health events of the cognitive-prefrailty, cognitive frailty and MCR syndromes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Cognitive frailty is the simultaneous presence of both physical frailty and cognitive impairment, excluding concurrent dementia. This condition confers a greater risk of incident cognitive impairment and decline, dementia, falls and disabilities compared to either condition alone. Current definitions of co-existent frailty and cognitive impairment exist, including the International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) and the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (IAGG) consensus for cognitive frailty. There is also an analogous construct known as the motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) associating slow gait speed and subjective cognitive impairment (SCI). Current operational criteria identify individuals later in the trajectory of frailty and cognitive decline, which may be too late for effective interventions. We propose to define a new and early condition in the spectrum of Cognitive frailty known as "cognitive-prefrailty", which is a combination of prefrailty stage and SCI.

Overall objective This study aims to: 1) Examine and compare the prevalence of cognitive-prefrailty, cognitive frailty and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) syndromes in participants of the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) using the (tracking and comprehensive) baseline assessment, 2) Examine the association of cognitive-prefrailty, cognitive frailty and MCR syndromes with incident adverse health events using the information collected during the first CLSA 18-month follow-up, 3) Compare the criteria performances (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), area under receiver operating characteristic curve, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR)) for incident adverse health events of the cognitive-prefrailty, cognitive frailty and MCR syndromes.

Methods This study will use the database of the CLSA, which is population-based observational and prospective cohort study that assesses and follows the health condition of the Canadian population. All items of cognitive-prefrailty, cognitive frailty and MCR syndromes have been collected during the baseline assessment in the tracking and the comprehensive assessments. In addition, all information needed to determine incident adverse health events including falls and related injuries, depression, functional decline, motoric cognitive risk syndrome, cognitive decline and dementia has been also collected during the first 18-month follow-up period.

Anticipated results Prefrailty is an intermediate and potentially reversible stage between robust and frailty that occur upstream in the continuum of frailty and hence constitute more suitable targets for screening and early intervention in older adults.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Frailty Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome Cognitive-prefrailty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Individuals with prefrailty

This is defined as a co-existing prefrailty using the Fried criteria. Frailty defined by the CHS index as proposed by Fried et al. will be identified by the presence of ≥ 3 of the following 5 components: 1) Shrinking: unintentional weight loss of ≥ 5% between two assessments, 2) Weakness: a maximal grip strength in the lowest quintile stratified by body mass index quartile; 3) Poor energy: answer of "no" to the question "Do you feel full of energy?" from the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale; 4) Slowness: average walk speed in the lowest quintile stratified by median standing height, and 5) Low physical activity level: PASE score in the lowest quintile. Participants with none of the above components will be considered to be vigorous and those with 1 or 2 components will be considered to be in a prefrail stage.

Data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Telephone interview questionnaire, in-home face-to-face interview, and data from the Collection Site

Individuals with cognitive-prefrailty

A combination of prefrailty stage using Fried criteria and subjective cognitive impairment (SCI).

The IANA/IAGG consensus defines cognitive frailty as CDR = 0.5 and frailty by the Fried criteria.

In this study, an individual will be considered a CHI if they meet the following criteria: no history of dementia, no use of anti-dementia drugs, normal cognitive performance on cognitive tests and normal scores of ADL and IADL scales. Different participant subgroups will be identified: 1) Individuals will be classified as MCI if they meet the following criteria: Objective cognitive impairment (i.e., performance between 1.5 and 1.9 SDs below the age-appropriate mean) in one or two cognitive domains (i.e., episodic memory and/or executive function) and normal scores of ADL and IADL scales; 2) Individuals will be considered older adults with mild-stage major neurocognitive disorders

Data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Telephone interview questionnaire, in-home face-to-face interview, and data from the Collection Site

Individuals with MCR

The diagnosis of MCR syndrome will be made following the criteria of Verghese et al. 5: a combination of subjective cognitive complaint, in particular of memory complaint, with the presence of an objective slow gait and the absence of dementia or mobility disability. MCR syndrome will be defined at baseline assessment and each year of follow-up period. Slow gait speed will be defined as gait speed that is one standard deviation (SD) or more below age-and sex-appropriate mean values established in the present cohort like in previous studies. The mean value and SD of female and male will be determined separately. Gait speed was determined from the 3-meter walking test using the best time of the two trials recorded and expressed as meters per second.

Memory complaint used to define MCR syndrome was based on standardized memory loss question on the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS; "Do you feel you have more problems with memory than most?").

Data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Telephone interview questionnaire, in-home face-to-face interview, and data from the Collection Site

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Data collection

Telephone interview questionnaire, in-home face-to-face interview, and data from the Collection Site

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. participants of the CLSA with baseline assessment (tracking and comprehensive assessment) and first 18-month follow-up assessment
2. age \> 50

Exclusion Criteria

1. no information which may directly or indirectly determine the occurrence of incident adverse health events (falls and related injuries, depression, functional decline, motoric cognitive risk syndrome, cognitive decline and dementia)
2. age \< 50 and demented LCSA participants if they meet the following criteria:

1. History of dementia or Alzheimer's disease and/or use of anti-dementia drugs (i.e., Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galentamine, regardless the dose taken)
2. Objective cognitive impairment (i.e., performance ≥2 SDs below the age-appropriate mean) in two cognitive domains (i.e., episodic memory and executive function) and abnormal scores on the ADL and IADL scales
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jewish General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Olivier Beauchet

MD, PhD, Professor of Geriatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-2183

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MCR Syndrome in Quebec : Results From NuAge Study
NCT05046275 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Loneliness as Risk Factor for Dementia
NCT07211945 NOT_YET_RECRUITING