Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-30
2019-06-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Augmenting Reactive Stepping With FES After SCI
NCT04309448
Prediction of Muscle Responsiveness to FES Therapy
NCT05462925
Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Walking: Reduction of Secondary Complications Due to Spinal Cord Injury
NCT00201968
Investigation Into Optimal FES Training Characteristics After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03621254
Time-effect of FEST+TST in the Upper-extremity Rehabilitation of Individuals with Traumatic SCI
NCT04910204
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Functional Electrical Stimulation
The device used was a prototype closed-loop FES system to improve standing balance by activating the ankle plantar flexors and dorsiflexors (i.e. A-FES system). As a closed-loop system, the body's position and velocity are continually monitored, and the level of stimulation adjusted accordingly on a moment-to-moment basis. This differs from currently available FES units, which do not monitor body movement and therefore, provide a constant level of stimulation unless manually adjusted by the user/PT. The control strategy used in the A-FES system mimics the physiological control system in able-bodied people, meaning it has the potential to "re-educate" normal movement patterns.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ≥18 years old;
3. Able to stand independently for 60s;
4. Moderate level of trunk control as evidenced by the ability to reach forward \>2 inches in standing (i.e. score of 2 on the BBS Reaching Forward task50,51); and
5. Free of any other condition besides SCI that significantly affects walking or balance (e.g., no vestibular disorder, significant vision loss, stroke).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Contractures in the lower extremities that prevent achieving a neutral hip and ankle position, or extended knee;
3. A prior lower extremity fragility fracture;
4. An injection of botulinum toxin to leg muscles in the past six months;
5. Peripheral nerve damage in the legs (i.e. leg muscles unresponsive to electrical stimulation);
6. A pressure sore (\>grade 2) on the pelvis or trunk where the safety harness is applied; o
7. Contraindications for FES52 (i.e. implanted electronic device, active cancer or radiation in past 6 months, epilepsy, skin rash/wound at a potential electrode site).
Participants will be withdrawn from the study if FES irritates their skin.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kristin E Musselman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lyndhurst Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-UHN
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Houston DJ, Unger J, Lee JW, Masani K, Musselman KE. Perspectives of individuals with chronic spinal cord injury following novel balance training involving functional electrical stimulation with visual feedback: a qualitative exploratory study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Apr 1;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00861-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-5151
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.