Metabolomic and Proteomic Profiles of Amniotic Fluid Embolism
NCT ID: NCT04256083
Last Updated: 2022-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-24
2021-10-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The pathophysiology of amniotic fluid embolism remains poorly known at this time.
The definition and diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism is only clinical, based on different scores, the most used of which is the score proposed by the United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). This score supports the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism in the event of acute maternal collapse associated with one or more of the following features: cardiac rhythm problems, acute fetal compromise, respiratory distress, maternal hemorrhage, coagulopathy, convulsions, premonitory symptoms (restlessness, numbness, tingling, agitation, etc.). ) seizure, in the absence of any other clear cause. Amniotic fluid embolism is a differential diagnosis of maternal collapse.
Determining specific biological markers for this disease would be very useful in order to be able to affirm the diagnosis and refute other diagnostic hypotheses with certainty. The detection of amniotic cells in the blood or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid seems to be of little help. The assay of plasma tryptase does not confirm the diagnosis of amniotic embolism, but is useful for ruling out the diagnosis of anaphylactic shock. The dosage of the complement lacks sensitivity and specificity to be useful in the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism. The maternal plasma assay of IGFBP-1 ("Insulin Growth Factor Binding Protein" type 1) has been proposed for the biological diagnosis of amniotic embolism. IGFBP-1 is present in high concentration in amniotic fluid, while its concentration is low in maternal plasma. High levels of IGFBP-1 in maternal blood would therefore make it possible to establish the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism with excellent sensitivity and specificity according to previous data collected from 25 patients. However, no study has confirmed this result to date. Other markers have also been suggested (zinc-coproporphyrin in particular), but to date, no specific marker for this disease has been formally identified.
Metabolic phenotyping consists in the identification of subtle and coordinated metabolic variations associated with various pathophysiological stimuli. Different analytical methods, such as nuclear magnetic resonance, allow the simultaneous quantification of a large number of metabolites. Statistical analyses of these spectra thus lead to the discrimination between samples and the identification of a metabolic phenotype corresponding to the effect under study. This approach allows the extraction of candidate biomarkers and the recovery of perturbed metabolic networks, driving to the generation of biochemical hypotheses (pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic tests, therapeutic targets,...).. It is thus possible to obtain biochemical characterizations of human biological samples (also called "metabolic profile or signature") which can be compared in order to identify distinctive elements of certain pathophysiological states, establishing a metabolic phenotype of the pathological state studied. This analysis can be supplemented by a study of the proteome (proteomics), in order to identify one or more biological markers associated with a disease.
The aim of this study is to determine the metabolic and proteomic phenotyping in three groups of women: women for whom the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism was retained according to the UKOSS clinical criteria (Group AFE), women admitted for prophylactic elective cesarean section (Group Control 1), women presenting acute collapse or shock in the peri- partum for which the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism has been excluded (severe hemorrhage, SEPSIS, pulmonary embolism for example; Group Control 2)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multicentric Prospective Study to Screen Inborn Errors of Metabolism in Non-immune Hydrops (NIH) Fetalis by Massively Parallel Sequencing
NCT04308603
Cell-free Fetal DNA Circulating in the Maternal Plasma as a Marker for Morbidly Adherent Placenta
NCT02784886
Coagulation Parameters During Pregnancy in Amniotic Fluid
NCT00458666
Presence of Nanoparticles in the Amniotic Fluid
NCT02720887
Point-of-care Ultrasound Abnormalities in Eclampsia
NCT05678062
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AFE (amniotic fluid embolism)
Women for whom the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism was retained according to the UKOSS criteria.
Biological analysis
Two blood samples of 4 ml each (total: 8 ml) for IGFBP1 assay and metabolic phenotyping and proteomic analysis.
Control 1
Women admitted for prophylactic elective cesarean section.
Biological analysis
Two blood samples of 4 ml each (total: 8 ml) for IGFBP1 assay and metabolic phenotyping and proteomic analysis.
Control 2
Women with acute collapse in the peripartum period (with systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg twice and for\> 5 minutes or acute peri-partum shock, for which the diagnosis of amniotic embolism has been ruled out).
Biological analysis
Two blood samples of 4 ml each (total: 8 ml) for IGFBP1 assay and metabolic phenotyping and proteomic analysis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Biological analysis
Two blood samples of 4 ml each (total: 8 ml) for IGFBP1 assay and metabolic phenotyping and proteomic analysis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* adult women
* presenting the diagnostic criteria for amniotic embolism according to the UKOSS initiative,
* having no known notable medical history (class of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 1)
* and whose samples were taken within the first 6 hours of collapse and were sent to the fetal-maternal biology laboratory of the Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL).
* Group Control 1
* term adult women
* admitted for scheduled caesarean, term (\> 38 weeks), without pathology or associated medical history (class of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 1),
* biological sample planned before the cesarean section (search for irregular agglutinins).
* Group Control 2:
* term adult women (\> 38 weeks)
* presenting a collapse (systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg twice and for\> 5 minutes) or acute peri-partum shock, for which the diagnosis of amniotic embolism is not retained,
* no known notable medical history (class of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 1),
* sampling taken within the first 6 hours of the shock or collapse.
Exclusion Criteria
* birth as part of an intrauterine fetal death or a therapeutic termination of pregnancy
* preeclampsia, eclampsia
* Gestational Diabetes
* any known endocrine pathology (diabetes, dysthyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, pituitary and hypothalamic diseases).
* history of autoimmune disease
* hemoglobin rate \<7 g / dl at the time of sampling (Control group 1 and 2)
* major protected (guardianship, curatorship) or placed under judicial protection
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service Anesthésie réanimation - Centre Hospitalier Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant - Groupement Hospitalier Est - Hospices Civils de Lyon
Bron, , France
Service d'anesthésie réanimation Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, , France
Service d'anesthésie réanimation Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Service Anesthésie Réanimation CHU de Hautepierre, Strasbourg
Strasbourg, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
69HCL19_0840
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.