Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
56 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-08-15
2022-07-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is a need to have a quantifiable measure of perceived stress and communication ability in patients. This is the first study of its kind to be conducted at MDMC. This pilot study will not only benefit the patients but also contribute to the medical community's understanding of treating the whole patient through mindfulness and shared decision making.
2.1. Study Objectives 2.1.1. Primary Objective To assess the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on inpatients and outpatients stress, patient-provider communication, and other measures of SDM at MDMC.
2.1.2. Secondary Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of such a study in the patient population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Dementia Caregivers
NCT04977245
Mindfulness Based Dementia Care Study
NCT04062227
Mindful-Med: the Evaluation of the Mindfulness-based Stress-coping and Burnout Prevention Programme for Medical Interns.
NCT07171697
The Impact of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, and Perceived Stress Among Healthcare Professionals
NCT07022613
A Self-directed Mobile Mindfulness Intervention to Address Distress and Burnout in Frontline Healthcare Workers
NCT04816708
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2.2. Study Outcome Measures 2.2.1. Primary Outcome
The effectiveness of the mindfulness-based intervention which will be assessed by:
Baseline and post-intervention perception of stress and anxiety Impact of stress on communication Emotional-Brain state Level of SDM during a pivotal visit with provider e.g. treatment planning visit (for outpatients only) The Emotional Distress-Anxiety (PROMIS, 2016), Communication Short Form (Cella, PROMIS, 2013), Emotional/Brain State Question (Mellin, 2017) and The Shared Decision Making dyadic OPTION scale (Melbourne, 2016) will be used to evaluate these outcomes.
2.2.2. Secondary Outcome Feasibility of such a study in the patient population and setting. This will be measured by the barriers encountered and the ability to successfully carry out the study.
2.3 Study Enrollment: 2.3.1.Study Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 years or olde
* Newly diagnosed cancer patient (breast, pancreatic, head \& neck, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal carcinoma with metastases to the liver) at MDMC, the Liver Institute, or Texas Oncology
* Provided written informed consent 2.3.2. Study Exclusion Criteria
* Below 18 years of age
* Does not have cancer
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
assess the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on inpatients' and outpatients' stress, patient-provider communication, and other measures of SDM at MDMC.
Effectiveness of the mindfulness-based intervention which will be assessed by:
Baseline and post-intervention perception of stress and anxiety Impact of stress on communication Emotional/Brain state Level of SDM during a pivotal visit with provider e.g. treatment planning visit (for outpatients only) The Emotional Distress-Anxiety (PROMIS, 2016), Communication Short Form (Cella, PROMIS, 2013), Emotional/Brain State Question (Mellin, 2017) and The Shared Decision Making dyadic OPTION scale (Melbourne, 2016) will be used to evaluate these outcomes.
Feasibility of such a study in the patient population and setting. This will be measured by the barriers encountered and the ability to successfully carry out the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Inpatients and outpatients receiving treatment at MDMC, the Liver Institute, or Texas Oncology
* Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Methodist Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Parvez Mantry, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Irving, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
030.HEP.2018.D
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.