Multicenter RCT for BIliary Brushing: RX Cytology, BOSTON vs. Infinity®, US Endoscopy
NCT ID: NCT04251013
Last Updated: 2022-06-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-07-01
2022-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnosis of Bile Duct Strictures
NCT02000999
Multibending vs Conventional Endoscope for Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy
NCT02189421
Nonradiation-to-endoscopist Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients With Complexity Level I/II
NCT02697149
NBI Versus Indigo Carmine During Colonoscopy in Lynch Syndrome
NCT02570516
Diagnostic Efficacy of EUS-FNA/B Versus ERCP With or Without POCS-TB in Patients With Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT05993429
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OBJECTIVES
* Main objective: Comparison of the rates of positive diagnosis of biliary brushing in cases of adenocarcinoma stenosis
* Secondary objective (s):
* Comparison of the quantification of the cellular material obtained (acellular, weak, or abundant), and the presence of cellular cupboards unhooked by the brush
* Comparison of the 2 brushes false negative rates, and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma
* Evaluation of the variation in the profitability of brushing and other sampling techniques (intra-biliary biopsies, puncture, aspiration of bile) according to the presence of a tumor mass syndrome of more than 1 cm.
* Evaluation of the variation in the profitability of brushing and other sampling techniques (intra-biliary biopsies, puncture, aspiration of bile) according to the site of the stenosis (distal vs proximal BPV: common bile duct or intrahepatic duct), with the cost effectiveness
* Technical failure rate of brushing and other samples (intra-biliary biopsies, bile aspiration)
This study concerns adult subjects with stenosis of the main bile duct (common bile duct or common hepatic duct).
ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE
* Deep catheterization of the biliary duct (whatever the access technique: by the papilla or by precut) and cross stenosis by the guide wire, then biliary dilation (6 to 8mm)
* Randomization if the inclusion criteria are met
* Biliary brushing successively with the 2 brushes in the order designated by randomization:
* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Aspiration, if possible of bile by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)
All possible sampling methods will also be taken to obtain the anatomopathological diagnosis: intra-biliary biopsies with adult or pediatric forceps, wire-guided or not, biopsy samples guided by choledochoscopy, puncture under endo-ultrasonography, bile aspiration after release of the biliary stent, according to the physician's habits.
EFFECTIVE The total number of subjects required: 50 (25 patients per group) Duration of the inclusion period: 2 years Duration of participation for each subject: from 7 days to 12 months (in case of negative initial withdrawal) Total duration of the study: 3 years
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A: RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific FIRST
A first biliary brushing will be carried out during ERCP using a standard brush RX Cytology Brush, Boston Scientific, then a second brushing will be carried out using a brush INFINITY®, US Endoscopy
Biliary brushing with the RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific
Biliary brushing during ERCP:
* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)
Biliary brushing with the Infinity® brush, US Endoscopy
Biliary brushing during ERCP:
* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)
Group B: Infinity®, US Endoscopy FIRST
A first biliary brushing will be carried out during ERCP using an INFINITY® brush, US Endoscopy then a second brushing will be carried out using standard RX Cytology Brush, Boston Scientific
Biliary brushing with the RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific
Biliary brushing during ERCP:
* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)
Biliary brushing with the Infinity® brush, US Endoscopy
Biliary brushing during ERCP:
* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Biliary brushing with the RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific
Biliary brushing during ERCP:
* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)
Biliary brushing with the Infinity® brush, US Endoscopy
Biliary brushing during ERCP:
* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient whose age is greater than or equal to 18 years and less than 90 years
* Patient ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3
* Lack of participation in another clinical study
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient under 18 or over 90
* Patient ASA 4, ASA 5
* Pregnant woman
* Patient (s) with coagulation abnormalities preventing puncture: TP \<50%, Platelets \<50,000 / mm3, effective anti-coagulation in progress, clopidogrel in progress
* Surgical setup (Billroth II, Roux en Y) preventing endoscopic access to the papilla
* Patient unable to give personal consent
* Lack of signed informed consent
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
KARSENTI
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinique Paris Bercy
Charenton-le-Pont, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Karsenti D, Privat J, Charissoux A, Perrot B, Leblanc S, Chaput U, Boytchev I, Levy J, Schaefer M, Bourgaux JF, Valats JC, Coron E, Moreno-Garcia M, Vanbiervliet G, Rahmi G, Robles EP, Wallenhorst T. Multicenter randomized trial comparing diagnostic sensitivity and cellular abundance with aggressive versus standard biliary brushing for bile duct stenosis without mass syndrome. Endoscopy. 2023 Sep;55(9):796-803. doi: 10.1055/a-2041-7687. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BIB study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.