Multicenter RCT for BIliary Brushing: RX Cytology, BOSTON vs. Infinity®, US Endoscopy

NCT ID: NCT04251013

Last Updated: 2022-06-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-01

Study Completion Date

2022-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this prospective national multicenter randomized study is to compare, during an ERCP for VBP stenosis, the sensitivity of two biliary brushes: the INFINITY® vs the RX Cytology Brush® The main objective is the comparison of the rates of positive diagnosis of biliary brushing in cases of adenocarcinoma stenosis The total number of subjects required: 50 (25 patients per group) Duration of the inclusion period: 2 years Duration of participation for each subject: from 7 days to 12 months (in case of negative initial withdrawal) Total duration of the study: 3 years

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to compare, during an ERCP for VBP stenosis, the sensitivity of two biliary brushes: the INFINITY® vs the RX Cytology Brush®

OBJECTIVES

* Main objective: Comparison of the rates of positive diagnosis of biliary brushing in cases of adenocarcinoma stenosis
* Secondary objective (s):

* Comparison of the quantification of the cellular material obtained (acellular, weak, or abundant), and the presence of cellular cupboards unhooked by the brush
* Comparison of the 2 brushes false negative rates, and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma
* Evaluation of the variation in the profitability of brushing and other sampling techniques (intra-biliary biopsies, puncture, aspiration of bile) according to the presence of a tumor mass syndrome of more than 1 cm.
* Evaluation of the variation in the profitability of brushing and other sampling techniques (intra-biliary biopsies, puncture, aspiration of bile) according to the site of the stenosis (distal vs proximal BPV: common bile duct or intrahepatic duct), with the cost effectiveness
* Technical failure rate of brushing and other samples (intra-biliary biopsies, bile aspiration)

This study concerns adult subjects with stenosis of the main bile duct (common bile duct or common hepatic duct).

ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE

* Deep catheterization of the biliary duct (whatever the access technique: by the papilla or by precut) and cross stenosis by the guide wire, then biliary dilation (6 to 8mm)
* Randomization if the inclusion criteria are met
* Biliary brushing successively with the 2 brushes in the order designated by randomization:

* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Aspiration, if possible of bile by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2
* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)

All possible sampling methods will also be taken to obtain the anatomopathological diagnosis: intra-biliary biopsies with adult or pediatric forceps, wire-guided or not, biopsy samples guided by choledochoscopy, puncture under endo-ultrasonography, bile aspiration after release of the biliary stent, according to the physician's habits.

EFFECTIVE The total number of subjects required: 50 (25 patients per group) Duration of the inclusion period: 2 years Duration of participation for each subject: from 7 days to 12 months (in case of negative initial withdrawal) Total duration of the study: 3 years

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biliary Stricture Jaundice, Obstructive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

National prospective multicenter RCT
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A: RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific FIRST

A first biliary brushing will be carried out during ERCP using a standard brush RX Cytology Brush, Boston Scientific, then a second brushing will be carried out using a brush INFINITY®, US Endoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biliary brushing with the RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biliary brushing during ERCP:

* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2

* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)

Biliary brushing with the Infinity® brush, US Endoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biliary brushing during ERCP:

* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2

* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)

Group B: Infinity®, US Endoscopy FIRST

A first biliary brushing will be carried out during ERCP using an INFINITY® brush, US Endoscopy then a second brushing will be carried out using standard RX Cytology Brush, Boston Scientific

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biliary brushing with the RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biliary brushing during ERCP:

* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2

* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)

Biliary brushing with the Infinity® brush, US Endoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biliary brushing during ERCP:

* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2

* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biliary brushing with the RX Cytology brush, Boston Scientific

Biliary brushing during ERCP:

* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2

* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biliary brushing with the Infinity® brush, US Endoscopy

Biliary brushing during ERCP:

* Performing a dozen back and forth movements in the stenosis
* Bile aspiration if possible, by the catheter of the brush for cytological analysis
* The contents of the brush will be spread over 3 blades (numbered) then sectioned and placed in cytolit with the contents of the tubing of the brush flushed with a few cc of cytolit. Each brush in a numbered pot. Blades 1,2 and 3 +/- bile 1 joined to pot n ° 1; blades 4,5 and 6 +/- bile 2 joined to pot 2

* In the event of technical failure (impossibility of accessing the stenosis with the first or second brush, impossibility of removing the brush), the patient will be considered to have failed for this brush (absence of pathological material brought back)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient admitted to one of the ERCP investigation centers with brushing and drainage for VBP stenosis (proximal or distal) during the study period
* Patient whose age is greater than or equal to 18 years and less than 90 years
* Patient ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3
* Lack of participation in another clinical study
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients admitted for ERCP for jaundice by lithiasic obstruction
* Patient under 18 or over 90
* Patient ASA 4, ASA 5
* Pregnant woman
* Patient (s) with coagulation abnormalities preventing puncture: TP \<50%, Platelets \<50,000 / mm3, effective anti-coagulation in progress, clopidogrel in progress
* Surgical setup (Billroth II, Roux en Y) preventing endoscopic access to the papilla
* Patient unable to give personal consent
* Lack of signed informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

KARSENTI

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique Paris Bercy

Charenton-le-Pont, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Karsenti D, Privat J, Charissoux A, Perrot B, Leblanc S, Chaput U, Boytchev I, Levy J, Schaefer M, Bourgaux JF, Valats JC, Coron E, Moreno-Garcia M, Vanbiervliet G, Rahmi G, Robles EP, Wallenhorst T. Multicenter randomized trial comparing diagnostic sensitivity and cellular abundance with aggressive versus standard biliary brushing for bile duct stenosis without mass syndrome. Endoscopy. 2023 Sep;55(9):796-803. doi: 10.1055/a-2041-7687. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36849106 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BIB study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

a/LCI-OCT Pilot in Esophagus
NCT04392167 COMPLETED NA