Angiogenic Markers in Cerebrovascular Disease (ANFIS)

NCT ID: NCT04240119

Last Updated: 2023-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is the most common cause of stroke worldwide. It carries a worse prognosis than other stroke etiologies, with an annual rate of recurrent stroke and death of 15% despite intensive medical management, and as high as 35% in certain populations. Overall, treatment and prevention of stroke due to ICAS has been unsuccessful. While two recent clinical trials have shown modest improvement in the efficacy of intensive medical treatment, these trials were terminated early given the elevated rate of complications, stroke, and death in the interventional arms. In fact, intensive medical management appears to reduce the risk of embolism; however, medical management alone does not address the progression of intracranial arterial stenosis or the pathophysiologic components of hypoperfusion and poor collateral circulation.

Levels and types of various angiogenic factors in the blood and tissues have been proposed to be predictive of patient outcome after ischemic stroke and treatment for stroke. This study therefore pursues a new paradigm to investigate responses to ICAS treatment from the perspective of cerebral collateral vessel generation and the role of angiogenic factors. Specifically, pro- and anti-angiogenic factors in patients with ICAS are evaluated at baseline and longitudinally in response to both medical and surgical treatment. For this we have developed methodologies for the isolation and measurement of these growth factors in plasma of patients with ICAS. These methodologies will enable us to obtain a detailed understanding of the variation and dynamic properties of local and circulating angiogenic factors over time in response to medical and surgical treatment, and their association to outcome phenotypes. This analysis is complemented by studies of angiographic development of neovascularization. If successful, this study will help to better understand the role of angiogenesis in ICAS and create a foundation from which to explore therapeutic treatments for ICAS which harness the natural processes of angiogenesis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is the most common cause of stroke worldwide. It accounts for at least 10% of all strokes in the United States and as much as 67% in countries with predominantly Asian, Hispanic, and Black populations. ICAS carries a worse prognosis than other stroke etiologies, with an annual rate of recurrent stroke and death of 15% despite intensive medical management, and as high as 35% in certain populations. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials have shown that angioplasty with stenting and bypass surgery fail to improve outcomes in patients with ICAS.

Overall treatment and prevention of stroke due to ICAS has been unsuccessful. The results of two recent clinical trials exploring interventions for the management of cerebrovascular occlusive disease-bypass surgery (Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study \[COSS\]) and angioplasty and stenting (SAMMPRIS)-have shown modest improvement in the efficacy of intensive medical treatment. However, both trials were terminated early given the elevated rate of complications, stroke, and death in the interventional arms. In the medical arms of COSS and SAMMPRIS, the rates of stroke and death at two years were 21% and 15%, respectively. Intensive medical management appears to reduce the risk of embolism; however, medical management alone does not address the progression of intracranial arterial stenosis or the pathophysiologic components of hypoperfusion and poor collateral circulation. Patients with prior stroke had an even higher rate of stroke, 35%.

Levels and types of various angiogenic factors in the blood and tissues have been proposed to be predictive of patient outcome after ischemic stroke and treatment for stroke. This study therefore pursues a new paradigm to investigate responses to ICAS treatment from the perspective of cerebral collateral vessel generation and the role of angiogenic factors. Specifically, pro- and anti-angiogenic factors in patients with ICAS are evaluated at baseline and longitudinally in response to both medical and surgical treatment. For this we have developed methodologies for the isolation and measurement of these growth factors in plasma of patients with ICAS. These methodologies will enable us to obtain a detailed understanding of the variation and dynamic properties of local and circulating angiogenic factors over time in response to medical and surgical treatment, and their association to outcome phenotypes. This analysis is complemented by studies of angiographic development of neovascularization. If successful, this study will help to better understand the role of angiogenesis in ICAS and create a foundation from which to explore therapeutic treatments for ICAS which harness the natural processes of angiogenesis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Transient Ischemic Attack Atherosclerosis Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Moyamoya

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

According to current clinical care standards

Enrolled subjects may be treated with medical management or surgically using indirect revascularization surgery.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 70% to 99% ICAS of a major intracranial artery diagnosed by angio, TCD, MRA, or CTA.

Exclusion Criteria

* Intracranial tumor or vascular malformation.
* Any hemorrhagic infarct within 14 days before enrollment or any other intracranial hemorrhage (subarachnoid, subdural, or epidural) within 30 days.
* Intracranial arterial stenosis related to arterial dissection or any known infectious or vasculitic disease.
* Presence of any unequivocal cardiac sources of embolism.
* Major surgery within previous 30 days before enrollment or planned in the next 180 days after enrollment,
* Severe neurologic deficit that renders the patient incapable of living independently.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nestor R. Gonzalez, MD, MSCR.

Professor of Neurosurgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nestor R Gonzalez, MD., MSCR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00046030

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.