Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Patients With IBSmechanism(s) of Action
NCT ID: NCT04236843
Last Updated: 2023-08-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
186 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-03
2022-03-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Donor Selection for Faecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT06171126
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT02092402
Fecal Transplantation in Patients With IBS
NCT03333291
FMT in the Treatment of IBS
NCT03561519
Donor Versus Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT04691544
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Donor Investigators are going to use the same super-donor they used in their previous randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The donor is athletic Caucasian man aging 36 years. He is non-smoker and is completely healthy without any medication and with a BMI of 23.5. He is not relative to any of the patients in the trial. He was borne by vaginal delivery and breastfeed. He was treated 3 times with antibiotics during his life. He trains 5 times weekly an hour each time. He took regularly dietary supplements rich in proteins, vitamins, fibres and minerals that made his diet richer than average in these substances. He was screened according to the guidelines for donors for FMT. Before he was accepted as a donor the microbiota was analysed in a faecal sample using GA-map Dysbiosis test. The analysis revealed a dysbiosis index (DI)= 1, indicating normobiosysis. In addition, he had excess of bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes. His faeces shall be tested every third moth during the trial.
Protocol
The patients are randomized to either 90 g transplant, 90 g transplant twice with 1week interval into the distal small intestine, or to 90 g transplant into the coecum of the colon. The patients shall complete 5 questionnaires and deliver fecal samples at the baseline, and at 3 , 6 , and 12 months after FMT.
Faeces collection, preparation and administration Faeces from both the donor and patients shall be collected and stored at - 80•. Frozen faeces shall be thawed and each 30 g is dissolved in 30 mL of 0.9% sterile saline. The dissolved stool administrated to the patients, after overnight fast, through working channel of gastroduodeno-scope in pars descendent duodenum distal to the papilla of Vater or to the coecum through working channel of a colonoscope.
Analysis Questionnaires
1. IBS symptom severity Scale (IBS-SSS).
2. Birmingham Symptom scale.
3. IBS-quality of life (IBSQo) Questionnaire.
4. Short form of Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI).
5. Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS).
Microbiome analysis Gut microbiota analysis is performed using the Genetic analysis-mapTM Dysbiosis test (Genetic Analysis AS, Oslo, Norway) by algorithmically assessing faecal bacterial abundance and profile (dysbiosis index, DI), and potential deviation in the microbiome from normobiosis. GA-map test is based on faecal homogenization, mechanical bacterial cell disruption and automated total bacterial genomic DNA extraction using magnetic beads. DI is based on 54 DNA probes targeting more than 300 bacterial strains based on their 16S rRNA sequence in seven variable regions (V3-V9). Twenty-six bacteria probes are species specific, 19 detect bacteria on genus level, and 9 probes detect bacteria at higher taxonomic levels. Probe labelling is by single nucleotide extension and hybridization to complementary probes coupled to magnetic beads, and signal detection by using BioCode 1000A 128-Plex Analyser (Applied BioCode, Santa Fe Springs, CA, USA). A DI above 2 shows a microbiota profile that differs from that of the normobiotic reference collection (DI 1-2: non-dysbiosis, DI: moderate, DI 4-5: severe dysbiosis).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Smal intestine once
90-g fecal transplant given into the small intestine once.
Feces
Feces from healthy donor
Small intestine twice
90-g fecal transplant given into the small intestine twice with 1 week interval.
Feces
Feces from healthy donor
Large intestine once
90-g fecal transplant given into the large intestine once.
Feces
Feces from healthy donor
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Feces
Feces from healthy donor
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients were investigated to exclude other gastrointestinal organic cause(s).
3. Moderate-to-severe IBS symptoms, as indicated by a score of ≥175 on the IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS).
Exclusion Criteria
2. The use of antibiotics or probiotics within 1 month prior to FMT.
3. Immunocompromised patients defined as those treated by immune- suppressive medications.
4. Patients with co-morbidity such as kidney failure or chronic heart disease.
5. System disease such as diabetes.
6. Patients with serious psychiatric disorders or drug abuse.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bergen
OTHER
Helse Fonna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Magdy El-Salhy, MD,PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Helse Fonna
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helse Fonna
Haugesund, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
El-Salhy M, Gilja OH, Hatlebakk JG. Factors underlying the long-term efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Microbes Infect. 2024 Nov-Dec;26(8):105372. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105372. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
El-Salhy M, Hatlebakk JG. Factors Underlying the Difference in Response to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Between IBS Patients with Severe and Moderate Symptoms. Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Apr;69(4):1336-1344. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08369-x. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
El-Salhy M, Gilja OH, Hatlebakk JG. Increasing the transplant dose and repeating faecal microbiota transplantation results in the responses of male patients with IBS reaching those of females. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr;59(4):391-400. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2292479. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
El-Salhy M, Gilja OH, Hatlebakk JG. Factors affecting the outcome of fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jan;36(1):e14641. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14641. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Helse Fonna
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.