Long Versus Short Axis Approach for Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access
NCT ID: NCT04234347
Last Updated: 2024-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
98 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-01
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Placement With and Without Use of a Guidewire
NCT02422472
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion in the Hospitalized Patient: Long vs. Short Axis Placement
NCT01870661
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Insertion
NCT03841864
Ultrasound Guided Axillary Versus Jugular Central Venous Catheterization
NCT02624323
"Syringe Free" Long-Axis In-Plane vs. Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Central Venous Catheter Placement
NCT04684069
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Long Axis approach
Utilize the longitudinal orientation when placing an USGPIV.
Intravenous access method
Comparing long and short axis approach to USGPIV access.
Short axis approach
Utilize the transverse orientation when placing an USGPIV.
Intravenous access method
Comparing long and short axis approach to USGPIV access.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intravenous access method
Comparing long and short axis approach to USGPIV access.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to consent
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Temple University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ryan Gibbons
Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ryan C Gibbons, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Temple University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tada M, Yamada N, Matsumoto T, Takeda C, Furukawa TA, Watanabe N. Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):CD013434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013434.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
26147
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.