Trial Outcomes & Findings for At-home Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation During Multitasking (NCT NCT04231825)

NCT ID: NCT04231825

Last Updated: 2022-03-21

Results Overview

Assessment of multitasking ability using change from baseline scores in d' cost (metric of discriminability). Discrimination performance (d') was measured for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). d' cost was then calculated as the ratio of d' during single task target discrimination task to multitask target discrimination, expressed as percentage cost.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

47 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)

Results posted on

2022-03-21

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Verum Stimulation
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Overall Study
STARTED
23
24
Overall Study
COMPLETED
20
20
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Verum Stimulation
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
3
3
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Verum Stimulation
n=23 Participants
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
n=24 Participants
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Total
n=47 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
19 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
38 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Age, Continuous
25.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
24.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
25 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
7 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
15 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
7 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
3 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
12 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
27 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
3 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
40 Participants
n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Single Task Performance
1.73 d'
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
2.01 d'
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
1.87 d'
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 • n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Multitask performance
1.03 d'
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
1.20 d'
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
1.12 d'
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.60 • n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Multitasking Cost Performance
45.8 Percent change
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.40 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
40.5 Percent change
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
43.2 Percent change
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31 • n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Continuous Performance Task RT
322 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
322 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
322 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39 • n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
Continuous Performance Task RTV
76 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
65 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=20 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed
71 milliseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 • n=40 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed

Assessment of multitasking ability using change from baseline scores in d' cost (metric of discriminability). Discrimination performance (d') was measured for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). d' cost was then calculated as the ratio of d' during single task target discrimination task to multitask target discrimination, expressed as percentage cost.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Verum Stimulation
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Multitasking Performance Cost (Neuroracer Performance Change From Baseline)
45.3 percentage change of d'
Standard Deviation 0.31
37.9 percentage change of d'
Standard Deviation 0.27

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed

Discrimination performance (d') was measured during single task performance for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). Performance data was collected during the single task condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Verum Stimulation
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Single Task Performance Change
1.99 d'
Standard Deviation 0.94
2.70 d'
Standard Deviation 1.07

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed

Discrimination performance (d') was measured while multitasking for each participant by comparing hit (correct responses to target signs) rates and false alarm (responses to non-targets) rates and calculated as d' = Z (hits) - Z (false alarms). Performance data was collected during the multitask condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Verum Stimulation
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Multitask Performance Change
1.17 d'
Standard Deviation 0.76
1.79 d'
Standard Deviation 0.89

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed

Assessment of sustained attention ability using response time (in ms) during the continuous performance test

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Verum Stimulation
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Continuous Performance Test RT Change (Test of Visual Attention / Sustained Attention)
300 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 42
303 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 31

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-tACS and post-tACS (1 week later)

Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed

Assessment of sustained attention ability using response time variability (standard deviation of response times in ms) during the continuous performance test

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Verum Stimulation
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
n=20 Participants
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Continuous Performance Test RTV Change (Test of Visual Attention / Sustained Attention)
58 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 26
56 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 21

Adverse Events

Verum Stimulation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Frequency Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Verum Stimulation
n=23 participants at risk
This group will receive 6-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Frequency Control
n=24 participants at risk
This group will receive 1-Hz tACS Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation across the prefrontal cortex using electrodes F3 and F4.
Product Issues
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Event
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • 10 months
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • 10 months

Additional Information

Dr. Theodore Zanto

University of California San Francisco

Phone: 415-502-7322

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place