Awareness, Expectations, and Perception of Anomaly Scan Among Mexican Pregnant Women
NCT ID: NCT04229654
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-11-04
2020-01-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Obese Pregnant Women: Optimizing Fetal Ultrasound
NCT02487641
Prevalence of Congenital Uterine Malformations
NCT01487616
Influence of Imaging Angle in Measurement of Cisterna Magna
NCT03697902
Prediction of Delivery Mode by Ultrasound-assessed Fetal Position in Nulliparous Women With Prolonged First Stage of Labor.
NCT05206409
Comparative Study of Learning Curve for First Trimester Fetal Anomaly Scan
NCT04707456
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Additionally, the questionnaire included demographic questions (age, parity, educational level, marital status). The source of the questionnaire items was interviews with experts.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional review board. The anomaly scan was performed by fetal-maternal specialists between 18 and 24.6-week gestation.
All data were recorded and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22.0 (SPSS Inc, Illinois, USA). Descriptive statistics were used for the sociodemographic data. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to delineate the factors associated with a higher knowledge level. A p-value \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire
A written questionnaire was used to capture demographic data, obstetric history, knowledge, expectations, and perception of anomaly scans.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Crireria:
* Time constraints
* Lack of interest
* Maternal blindness
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. med Flavio Hernández Castro
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Flavio Hernández-Castro, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ugwu AC, Udoh BE, Eze JC, Eze PC. Awareness of information, expectations and experiences among women for obstetric sonography in a south east Nigeria population. East Afr J Public Health. 2011 Jun;8(2):132-4.
Westerneng M, Diepeveen M, Witteveen AB, Westerman MJ, van der Horst HE, van Baar AL, de Jonge A. Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2470-9.
Buyukbayrak EE, Soysal S, Anik Ilhan G, Yavuzer O. What do expectant parents know about antenatal ultrasound screening? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;33(11):1811-1817. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1530209. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
Bricker L, Garcia J, Henderson J, Mugford M, Neilson J, Roberts T, Martin MA. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women's views. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(16):i-vi, 1-193. No abstract available.
Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin MA, Mugford M, Nielson J, Roberts T. Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth. 2002 Dec;29(4):225-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00198.x.
Tautz S, Jahn A, Molokomme I, Gorgen R. Between fear and relief: how rural pregnant women experience foetal ultrasound in a Botswana district hospital. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(5):689-701. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00321-4.
Salmoukas C, Kundu S, Soergel P, Hillemanns P, von Kaisenberg C, Staboulidou I. Background Knowledge and Attitude of Pregnant Women towards Ultrasound Screening at 20-23 Weeks Gestation. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2016 Feb;220(1):16-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545287. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GI15017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.